By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - The Road to 160m+ for Nintendo Switch (EDIT: See mod note in first post for new rule).

XtremeBG said:
tak13 said:
I had forgotten that 4m is a revised forecast, fingers crossed for eventually attaining the original target.

I have substantiated why in previous posts. 

(Japan) 

My opinion is that the relatively strong performance in Japan for Switch 1 lately is on borrowed time. But that is just my opinion.. we will find out soon enough when the next couple of weeks rolls out.

Can't wait to see if tomodachi life will extend that perhaps borrowed time. 



Around the Network

I wish rol would just come back and tell us what will happen so this can be settled



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0

trunkswd said:
XtremeBG said:

You mean 156.12M right ? They were 152.12M as of March 31st 2025. They originally forecasted 4.5M which would lead them to 156.62M, however they adjusted down their forecast to 4M, and meeting it will result in 156.12M. So almost 4M left if they meet that 4M forecast..

Ah damn yes you are right. My bad.

With that a 50% drop would mean 158.12m as of March 2027, 159.12m as of March 2028, 159.62 in March 2029, then 250K for another 50% drop would be 159.87M in March 2030. Unless Nintendo keeps manufacturing them until like 2030 the drop in reality needs to be a bit less than 50% to reach 160 million.

45% drop would be 2.2M for 158.32 in March 2027, then 1.21M for a total of 159.53M in March 2028, then 0.665M for a total of 160.195M in March 2029.

One thing to be mindful is the stock Nintendo would have in warehouses. This time last year the Switch was Nintendos primary console and, they probably would have about 2 million consoles in warehouses worldwide. Now that the Switch 2 is the primary console the original switches in warehouses is probably 0.5 to 1 million (probably closer to the 0.5 million). So even if the Switch ships 4 million for the current fiscal year, It's true sales are probably 1 to 1.5 million more then 4m. 

So if you use the your 50% reduction prediction. It becomes a lot more interesting if your going off a 5m to 5.5m figure instead of 4m. 



Double post



Soundwave said:

If I was Nintendo I would just keep manufacturing the systems for another 5-6 years. Who says you have to stop manufacturing a system at a certain cut off year? Personally I'd have no problem if they kept making 3DS systems too.

The concern in the past always was that "well you have to retire the system because the store can't possibly store/stock shelf space for games of a old system", but that isn't the case anymore with digital libraries. 

If you can walk into any Footlocker in the world basically and buy a pair of Air Jordan 1s (a shoe that first released in 1984 ... over 40 years ago now) like right now, like what's the big deal with a game console that's 10 years old. 

A console (or handheld) can't go on "forever". At one point old components become more expensive again. At that point you have no choice than to retire the system.



Around the Network
Fight-the-Streets said:
Soundwave said:

If I was Nintendo I would just keep manufacturing the systems for another 5-6 years. Who says you have to stop manufacturing a system at a certain cut off year? Personally I'd have no problem if they kept making 3DS systems too.

The concern in the past always was that "well you have to retire the system because the store can't possibly store/stock shelf space for games of a old system", but that isn't the case anymore with digital libraries. 

If you can walk into any Footlocker in the world basically and buy a pair of Air Jordan 1s (a shoe that first released in 1984 ... over 40 years ago now) like right now, like what's the big deal with a game console that's 10 years old. 

A console (or handheld) can't go on "forever". At one point old components become more expensive again. At that point you have no choice than to retire the system.

I'm pretty sure actually a console can go on forever. Nintendo could manufacture the NES or SNES or N64 today and it's not like it would kill them to do so, and you know what? There definitely would be a market for that. The real reason is they want to force/push people into buying the newer hardware. 



Id buy another nes snes or 64 just to add to the totals



Total Championships: Nintendo - 4, Sony - 2, Atari - 1, Microsoft - 0, Sega - 0

Soundwave said:
Fight-the-Streets said:

A console (or handheld) can't go on "forever". At one point old components become more expensive again. At that point you have no choice than to retire the system.

I'm pretty sure actually a console can go on forever. Nintendo could manufacture the NES or SNES or N64 today and it's not like it would kill them to do so, and you know what? There definitely would be a market for that. The real reason is they want to force/push people into buying the newer hardware. 

Sure, but then they’d also have to put the games and cartridges for those systems back in production.

Which would be cool, don’t get me wrong. It would also serve as a huge middle finger to scalpers and pirates. 

But they’re not going to do that if it takes away from Switch 2 or even Switch 1. And ESPECIALLY NSO, That service, more than anything, would take the most damage from all their old games and consoles being put back in production, even if it’s on a small scale.

Last edited by PAOerfulone - on 25 March 2026

PAOerfulone said:
Soundwave said:

I'm pretty sure actually a console can go on forever. Nintendo could manufacture the NES or SNES or N64 today and it's not like it would kill them to do so, and you know what? There definitely would be a market for that. The real reason is they want to force/push people into buying the newer hardware. 

Sure, but then they’d also have to put the games and cartridges for those systems back in production.

Which would be cool, don’t get me wrong. It would also serve as a huge middle finger to scalpers and pirates. 

But they’re not going to so that if it takes away from Switch 2 or even Switch 1. And ESPECIALLY NSO, That service, more than anything, would take the most damage from all their old games and consoles being put back in production, even if it’s on a small scale.

Well that was the point I was making, today you don't have to have physical carts in production because you have digital distribution. 

That used to be a reason why consoles had to phased out in the past, retailers couldn't hold a ton of shelf space for old system libraries, that isn't a problem today. 

In the mid-90s in Japan for example Nintendo actually did things like allow consumers to buy blank cartridges for the Super Famicom (SNES) and Game Boy where you could download games on the blank cartridge from kiosk in the store as those systems got older, the thought process being that stores didn't want to give those systems a ton of shelf space for the games. Obviously today the internet and digital storage solves that problem entirely. 

The Switch Lite especially could be kept being made for another 3-4 years IMO. 



So .. with the recent price hike of the one of the current gen systems, and very likely the Switch 2 soon, Switch 1 will be the most affordable system by a long shot. At just 230$ for the Lite or just 340$ for the OG model, this might be enough to prolong it sales .. for how long however? The Switch 2 price will most likely go up if not by 100$, then surely by at least 70$. So the cheapest gaming system above the Switch 1 will be close to 200$ more, and if you look at handhelds, then around 300$ more, which is big. And even if you compare the OG model instead of the Lite, the difference will again be a whopping 200$.



My primary threads:

Ultimate Showdowns: JP 2023 / JP 2024 / JP 2025 / JP 2026 / 2026 / 2025 / 2024 / 2023 / 20222021

Lifetime Showdowns: Global / Regional / Historical / YOY Charts / 150M+ Club Chart

PS5 vs SW2 in 2026Biggest months, years and holidays / When will the Switch pass 160M? / LT expectations of: Switch / PS5 / XBSX / Switch 2