Are they though? Mobile phone level CPU. phone/tablet level amount of RAM with similar bandwidth speeds. The only semi decent aspect of it's specs is it's GPU but that's really only because of DLSS saving it. The PS5 specs are great for the price though, and that's why it's so popular and selling so well. Gaming is technological and tech specs are not something you can ignore and hope for the best. Why do you think Sony and MS spent so much on the R&D of PS5 and Xbox series? They know how important they are and they wouldn't do it for no good reason. 

Yep, don't post anything related to to the topic itself, just a comment to ridicule one individual. A lot of people in this thread have been sceptical of switch 2 but you only picked my comment? Also, comments without any relevance to the thread itself is against VGChartz terms of use. 

Horribad take. 

Switch 2 has fine hardware, performs as well/better than far PC handhelds that cost a lot more in a lot of cases. Of course it uses mobile components, it has to unless you want something that has 10 minutes of battery life and the size of a Game Gear (which would sell 500 units lifetime). 

The Switch 2 is the first time in the modern 3D graphics era where a portable device can basically run modern generation console games. Star Wars Outlaws, Assassin's Creed, Resident Evil 9 Requiem launching day and date with the other versions, etc. etc. already prove it that will be the tip of the iceberg. 

Every system these days would love to have more killer apps early on in the product cycle. The PS5 and XBox Series S/X had jack shit for exclusives in their first year as well. Game development cycles simply mean the early part of every new game platform will be padded hard by cross-gen releases. You can't magically pull a AAA release out of your ass in 18-36 months anymore like you could in the past. 

Horribad take. 

Switch 2 has fine hardware, performs as well/better than far PC handhelds that cost a lot more in a lot of cases. Of course it uses mobile components, it has to unless you want something that has 10 minutes of battery life and the size of a Game Gear (which would sell 500 units lifetime). 

The Switch 2 is the first time in the modern 3D graphics era where a portable device can basically run modern generation console games. Star Wars Outlaws, Assassin's Creed, Resident Evil 9 Requiem launching day and date with the other versions, etc. etc. already prove it that will be the tip of the iceberg. 

Every system these days would love to have more killer apps early on in the product cycle. The PS5 and XBox Series S/X had jack shit for exclusives in their first year as well. Game development cycles simply mean the early part of every new game platform will be padded hard by cross-gen releases. You can't magically pull a AAA release out of your ass in 18-36 months anymore like you could in the past. 

Skyrim is a PS3 game, of course the Switch 2 can handle it, if it's a PS4 like version it should run at 60fps there.

Skyrim is a PS3 game, of course the Switch 2 can handle it, if it's a PS4 like version it should run at 60fps there.

So when it comes running in at 30fps (much like PS3Reload) a lot of us come to the quick conclusion that it was more likely a lazy port. How is it that ports like Sonic Cross Worlds run at a smooth 60FPS but skyrim cannot?