RolStoppable said:
Mnementh said: 1. How could Harris enact such policies, if she was Vice President? Did you actually read what I wrote? The Biden administration did something, but by far not enough. I showed the statistics, more and more people get poor and have problems, while the rich continually gets richer. If it is all the economy, why have only the working class to take the burden? That is something policy can do something about, that is what Bernie Sanders called out. Harris couldn't do anything yet about that, she wasn't president. She did indeed though find nothing worthy to change over the Biden administration. RolStoppable said:
Votes in California are still being counted because the deadline for mail-in ballots is apparently today; estimate is that ~25% are left to count in that state which amounts to at least 4 million votes. In other words, the final numbers of this election aren't even in yet. But more importantly, because of the American voting system you have to look at state results instead of national results, and specifically the seven swing states which were really the only ones that mattered because all the other states were regarded as secure and turned out that way too. The counting in the swing states is pretty much done, so this is worth looking at. Arizona: Harris -160k compared to Biden in 2020 (Trump +30k compared to himself in 2020); Georgia: Harris +70k (Trump +200k); Michigan: Harris -70k (Trump +150k); Nevada: Harris -10k (Trump +60k); North Carolina: Harris +0k (Trump +130k); Pennsylvania: Harris -120k (Trump +170k); Wisconsin: Harris +40k (Trump +90k). There's something of everything in these results. Arizona falls in line with your assertion that Harris lost votes that Trump didn't gain. Georgia, North Carolina and Wisconsin have both candidates gaining, but Trump moreso. Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania have Trump gain at the expense of Harris. |
Sure, but most is counted. And lets concede, yes maybe some former democrats now voted Trump. I assume more people came from non-voters, but that is just an assumption. The fact stays, that the majority of vote the democrats lost didn't go over to Trump. 2. Both campaigns had ads about pretty much everything. The Harris campaign had 1 billion dollar to burn. But what was the main messaging here? Working class? Nah. That barely made a dent. And given that under the democratic administration of Biden the working class had to suffer the economic downfall and not the rich, people got fed up to begin with. In that surrounding the messaging just wasn't convincing. There should have been more and bolder proposals. RolStoppable said:
Lastly, you've said it before that you don't want to help the right. But that's exactly what you are doing by picking up their narrative that the Democrats are to blame for everything, with no responsibility whatsoever lying with the voters. |
3. The gaslighting is strong with you. I didn't pick up any right-wing propaganda. I cited Bernie Sanders, Mike Figueredo, Kyle Kulinski, Hasan Piker - actual left wingers. Not the center-right of the mass of the democratic party you are going so hard to bat for. You want to deny that any fault lies with the Democrats and that they lost big parts of the electorate because they don't care for them. You are telling people that live a harder live because of their circumstances that they should suck it up and they are being idiots and should vote dems - without expecting more than a bare minimum. You go on to state points what you make out as reasons declaring it as facts. In denying people their reality you are actually the one helping the right, and you keep on doing so. If that is indicative of the democratic party, than probably the better course of action is not to try to reform the dems, but actually create a left-wing workers party. Because it is evident, that the current far-right Reps and center-right Dems are leaving behind more and more of the country. There is a lot of space left of them. |
1. You are asking very stupid questions here. Harris was the presidential candidate and talked about the policies she will introduce once she is president. She told people that inflation has come down, but that isn't enough yet. She has said that over and over again during her campaign. You are clinging to her one isolated statement she made on The View and take that as her consistent message during her campaign, but that statement was an answer to the question what she would have done differently if she were president during the Biden term. It wasn't a question about what she will do during her term. 2. Yes, working class was the main message. How many American broadcasts did you watch as a German who isn't interested in sports? Most likely a grand zero. You hardly posted in this thread before the election either, so you are pretty much stumbling in here blindly and running with the limited information you like the most. That's why sundin is saying that you must live in an alternate reality, and he is right in saying that. Which leads to your conclusion... 3. ...that is inevitably off base because your premise what the Harris campaign was about is so wrong already. It's also rich that you accuse me of denial after deliberately snipping my post to leave out the part where I placed blame on the Democrats. https://kamalaharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Policy_Book_Economic-Opportunity.pdf Just read the bullet points on page 3, that's what Harris ran on. |
And yet... working class peoples lives got worse during the Biden administration while rich people got richer.
And yet... if asked (which AOC did) many people say working class problems.
You and many of the more wealthy middle class are fine with what Biden/Harris did. Many people are not, they are angry and feels like the Democrats act like their worries don't matter. That is the result that can be seen. Now you can deny it or you can ask why. You seem to invest all your energy on denial.
I wasn't very active in the thread, because I had over the last elections mostly lost the belief that the Democrats can tackle real issues. In the last elections Sanders did run in the primaries and brought on a lot of these issues. The big loss this time may have been a chance that the Democrats wake up and listen to the poorer, less educated, working class people. But you and others here keep convincing me that the Democrats aren't willing to change, to not even see any reason to do so. I don't think they will do much better in the future given this. I also don't think this will work out in Austria either, have fun with the FPÖ.
The democrats in the US did move to the right over the years, allowing the Republicans to go even more extreme right. If the democrats are not willing to change course, I believe we need a new real left movement. And not only in the US, europe sees similar problems with many establishment parties moving away from left positions while at the same time this gives room to fascist movements: Le Pen, AfD, FPÖ, Orban, PiS. I believe the antidote is bringing back real leftist movements with strong social and economic left policies. But most parties are afraid to piss off major companies and rich people, and yes, that includes the Democrats in the US. But that will be needed in my opinion.
As a leftist it is frustrating to discuss online. Issues and problems of people are denied. And you get accused of supporting the right, as you tried in the last post. So yeah, use the loss as a chance to reform or don't do anything and blame the voters.
3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)
my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024
10 years greatest game event!
bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]