By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - 2024 US Presidential Election

EricHiggin said:

Political aggression in general, in a democracy or similar, also tends to mean one side can't make its case to the opposition, so you start with aggression before you move on to force, to try and get your way. The left these days likes to say it's because some people, especially on the right, are so stupid, but that doesn't really make any sense, because that would mean the left was smarter, if not much smarter, and if they were that smart, it should be easy to dumb it down and explain it to most of the 'idiots'.

Some people just don't understand for different reasons, but there are some others who think they're much smarter than they actually are, as well some others who aren't near as dumb and useless as they're told they are. There's way too many people in bubbles that think they're open minded, when they're actually more so in "The Matrix" and don't realize it, or far worse, realize it, like it, and think it's what's best for everyone.

Contrary to one of my earlier post in this thread I don't actually think the right is "stupid". However that is not the point I want to make. 

The point I want to make is complicated issues are often complicated to solve but we as humans will default to what seems like the easiest solution. We believe what sounds simpler and easier to understand as best option. When often it could be the opposite but to explain so would take too much time to put in a TV ad or a 30 second soundbite. I think of this similar to the Dunning-Kruger Effect. You speak to someone who is a google expert on an issue they will tell you how to fix it but you talk to a real expert they will tell you fixing it is complicated.

I am bias here, but I often find that the democratic position is the more complicated of the two. Take immigration, it is easy to understand anyone who got here illegally was not supposed to be here should be removed. It is more complicated to explain that our already broken system is baked in and removing 12 million workers is detrimental to our workforce especially in the Agricultural sector and will likely result in higher prices at the grocery store. 

Let alone we live in a divided news media ecosystem where opposite positions don't really get fair coverage or are properly challenged on the positions they hold.   

 



 

My Real Redneck friends


Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
Mnementh said:

1. How could Harris enact such policies, if she was Vice President? Did you actually read what I wrote? The Biden administration did something, but by far not enough. I showed the statistics, more and more people get poor and have problems, while the rich continually gets richer. If it is all the economy, why have only the working class to take the burden? That is something policy can do something about, that is what Bernie Sanders called out. Harris couldn't do anything yet about that, she wasn't president. She did indeed though find nothing worthy to change over the Biden administration.

RolStoppable said:

Votes in California are still being counted because the deadline for mail-in ballots is apparently today; estimate is that ~25% are left to count in that state which amounts to at least 4 million votes. In other words, the final numbers of this election aren't even in yet. But more importantly, because of the American voting system you have to look at state results instead of national results, and specifically the seven swing states which were really the only ones that mattered because all the other states were regarded as secure and turned out that way too. The counting in the swing states is pretty much done, so this is worth looking at.

Arizona: Harris -160k compared to Biden in 2020 (Trump +30k compared to himself in 2020); Georgia: Harris +70k (Trump +200k); Michigan: Harris -70k (Trump +150k); Nevada: Harris -10k (Trump +60k); North Carolina: Harris +0k (Trump +130k); Pennsylvania: Harris -120k (Trump +170k); Wisconsin: Harris +40k (Trump +90k).

There's something of everything in these results. Arizona falls in line with your assertion that Harris lost votes that Trump didn't gain. Georgia, North Carolina and Wisconsin have both candidates gaining, but Trump moreso. Michigan, Nevada and Pennsylvania have Trump gain at the expense of Harris.

Sure, but most is counted. And lets concede, yes maybe some former democrats now voted Trump. I assume more people came from non-voters, but that is just an assumption. The fact stays, that the majority of vote the democrats lost didn't go over to Trump.

2. Both campaigns had ads about pretty much everything. The Harris campaign had 1 billion dollar to burn. But what was the main messaging here? Working class? Nah. That barely made a dent. And given that under the democratic administration of Biden the working class had to suffer the economic downfall and not the rich, people got fed up to begin with. In that surrounding the messaging just wasn't convincing. There should have been more and bolder proposals.

RolStoppable said:

Lastly, you've said it before that you don't want to help the right. But that's exactly what you are doing by picking up their narrative that the Democrats are to blame for everything, with no responsibility whatsoever lying with the voters.

3. The gaslighting is strong with you. I didn't pick up any right-wing propaganda. I cited Bernie Sanders, Mike Figueredo, Kyle Kulinski, Hasan Piker - actual left wingers. Not the center-right of the mass of the democratic party you are going so hard to bat for. You want to deny that any fault lies with the Democrats and that they lost big parts of the electorate because they don't care for them. You are telling people that live a harder live because of their circumstances that they should suck it up and they are being idiots and should vote dems - without expecting more than a bare minimum. You go on to state points what you make out as reasons declaring it as facts.

In denying people their reality you are actually the one helping the right, and you keep on doing so. If that is indicative of the democratic party, than probably the better course of action is not to try to reform the dems, but actually create a left-wing workers party. Because it is evident, that the current far-right Reps and center-right Dems are leaving behind more and more of the country. There is a lot of space left of them.

1. You are asking very stupid questions here. Harris was the presidential candidate and talked about the policies she will introduce once she is president. She told people that inflation has come down, but that isn't enough yet. She has said that over and over again during her campaign. You are clinging to her one isolated statement she made on The View and take that as her consistent message during her campaign, but that statement was an answer to the question what she would have done differently if she were president during the Biden term. It wasn't a question about what she will do during her term.

2. Yes, working class was the main message. How many American broadcasts did you watch as a German who isn't interested in sports? Most likely a grand zero. You hardly posted in this thread before the election either, so you are pretty much stumbling in here blindly and running with the limited information you like the most. That's why sundin is saying that you must live in an alternate reality, and he is right in saying that. Which leads to your conclusion...

3. ...that is inevitably off base because your premise what the Harris campaign was about is so wrong already. It's also rich that you accuse me of denial after deliberately snipping my post to leave out the part where I placed blame on the Democrats.

https://kamalaharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Policy_Book_Economic-Opportunity.pdf

Just read the bullet points on page 3, that's what Harris ran on.

And yet... working class peoples lives got worse during the Biden administration while rich people got richer.

And yet... if asked (which AOC did) many people say working class problems.

You and many of the more wealthy middle class are fine with what Biden/Harris did. Many people are not, they are angry and feels like the Democrats act like their worries don't matter. That is the result that can be seen. Now you can deny it or you can ask why. You seem to invest all your energy on denial.

I wasn't very active in the thread, because I had over the last elections mostly lost the belief that the Democrats can tackle real issues. In the last elections Sanders did run in the primaries and brought on a lot of these issues. The big loss this time may have been a chance that the Democrats wake up and listen to the poorer, less educated, working class people. But you and others here keep convincing me that the Democrats aren't willing to change, to not even see any reason to do so. I don't think they will do much better in the future given this. I also don't think this will work out in Austria either, have fun with the FPÖ.

The democrats in the US did move to the right over the years, allowing the Republicans to go even more extreme right. If the democrats are not willing to change course, I believe we need a new real left movement. And not only in the US, europe sees similar problems with many establishment parties moving away from left positions while at the same time this gives room to fascist movements: Le Pen, AfD, FPÖ, Orban, PiS. I believe the antidote is bringing back real leftist movements with strong social and economic left policies. But most parties are afraid to piss off major companies and rich people, and yes, that includes the Democrats in the US. But that will be needed in my opinion.

As a leftist it is frustrating to discuss online. Issues and problems of people are denied. And you get accused of supporting the right, as you tried in the last post. So yeah, use the loss as a chance to reform or don't do anything and blame the voters.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

PDF said:
EricHiggin said:

Political aggression in general, in a democracy or similar, also tends to mean one side can't make its case to the opposition, so you start with aggression before you move on to force, to try and get your way. The left these days likes to say it's because some people, especially on the right, are so stupid, but that doesn't really make any sense, because that would mean the left was smarter, if not much smarter, and if they were that smart, it should be easy to dumb it down and explain it to most of the 'idiots'.

Some people just don't understand for different reasons, but there are some others who think they're much smarter than they actually are, as well some others who aren't near as dumb and useless as they're told they are. There's way too many people in bubbles that think they're open minded, when they're actually more so in "The Matrix" and don't realize it, or far worse, realize it, like it, and think it's what's best for everyone.

Contrary to one of my earlier post in this thread I don't actually think the right is "stupid". However that is not the point I want to make. 

The point I want to make is complicated issues are often complicated to solve but we as humans will default to what seems like the easiest solution. We believe what sounds simpler and easier to understand as best option. When often it could be the opposite but to explain so would take too much time to put in a TV ad or a 30 second soundbite. I think of this similar to the Dunning-Kruger Effect. You speak to someone who is a google expert on an issue they will tell you how to fix it but you talk to a real expert they will tell you fixing it is complicated.

I am bias here, but I often find that the democratic position is the more complicated of the two. Take immigration, it is easy to understand anyone who got here illegally was not supposed to be here should be removed. It is more complicated to explain that our already broken system is baked in and removing 12 million workers is detrimental to our workforce especially in the Agricultural sector and will likely result in higher prices at the grocery store. 

Let alone we live in a divided news media ecosystem where opposite positions don't really get fair coverage or are properly challenged on the positions they hold.   

You're just saying it's more complicated because the Dems made it that way with poor immigration policies. Making a mess and then suggesting someone leave it that way isn't a reasonable answer to the problem. The illegal immigrants weren't supposed to be in America to begin with, so removing them makes perfect sense. Obama even understood this during his Presidency. If Biden and Harris saw the need for more immigrant farm workers, they should've figured out a better way to bring them in legally. It's not like rural Republican farmers would've been against that if they need the help.

Higher food prices aren't the problem, it's people not being able to pay for it because of the poorly run economy. The food sector doesn't make jack in terms of profits, so it's not like they're gouging. Kamala may have kept pointing the finger at them, but that's because it was easy, but she doesn't know what she's talking about. I grew up on a farm, so if you think the food industry is the problem then you clearly don't get it, because it's the least of your worries in terms of rich elite sleazeballs trying to empty your pockets.

The news media sucks for information besides perhaps the weather. Podcasts are so much better than the news it's not funny. They aren't perfect, but their multi-hour format allows people to get into all the details as well as hash them out if they're seriously looking to do so.



EricHiggin said:

You're just saying it's more complicated because the Dems made it that way with poor immigration policies. Making a mess and then suggesting someone leave it that way isn't a reasonable answer to the problem. The illegal immigrants weren't supposed to be in America to begin with, so removing them makes perfect sense. Obama even understood this during his Presidency. If Biden and Harris saw the need for more immigrant farm workers, they should've figured out a better way to bring them in legally. It's not like rural Republican farmers would've been against that if they need the help.

Higher food prices aren't the problem, it's people not being able to pay for it because of the poorly run economy. The food sector doesn't make jack in terms of profits, so it's not like they're gouging. Kamala may have kept pointing the finger at them, but that's because it was easy, but she doesn't know what she's talking about. I grew up on a farm, so if you think the food industry is the problem then you clearly don't get it, because it's the least of your worries in terms of rich elite sleazeballs trying to empty your pockets.

The news media sucks for information besides perhaps the weather. Podcasts are so much better than the news it's not funny. They aren't perfect, but their multi-hour format allows people to get into all the details as well as hash them out if they're seriously looking to do so.

This doesn't work for liberals.  There aren't any reliable independents on their side that aren't race grifting, hyper woke, or medically induced spergs.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

IkePoR said:
EricHiggin said:

You're just saying it's more complicated because the Dems made it that way with poor immigration policies. Making a mess and then suggesting someone leave it that way isn't a reasonable answer to the problem. The illegal immigrants weren't supposed to be in America to begin with, so removing them makes perfect sense. Obama even understood this during his Presidency. If Biden and Harris saw the need for more immigrant farm workers, they should've figured out a better way to bring them in legally. It's not like rural Republican farmers would've been against that if they need the help.

Higher food prices aren't the problem, it's people not being able to pay for it because of the poorly run economy. The food sector doesn't make jack in terms of profits, so it's not like they're gouging. Kamala may have kept pointing the finger at them, but that's because it was easy, but she doesn't know what she's talking about. I grew up on a farm, so if you think the food industry is the problem then you clearly don't get it, because it's the least of your worries in terms of rich elite sleazeballs trying to empty your pockets.

The news media sucks for information besides perhaps the weather. Podcasts are so much better than the news it's not funny. They aren't perfect, but their multi-hour format allows people to get into all the details as well as hash them out if they're seriously looking to do so.

This doesn't work for liberals.  There aren't any reliable independents on their side that aren't race grifting, hyper woke, or medically induced spergs.

Rich. With your hit and run posts you sound like someone who just stumbled onto 4chan and have a hard time containing their retarded thoughts from flowing like verbal diarrhoea.



Around the Network
Mnementh said:
RolStoppable said:

1. You are asking very stupid questions here. Harris was the presidential candidate and talked about the policies she will introduce once she is president. She told people that inflation has come down, but that isn't enough yet. She has said that over and over again during her campaign. You are clinging to her one isolated statement she made on The View and take that as her consistent message during her campaign, but that statement was an answer to the question what she would have done differently if she were president during the Biden term. It wasn't a question about what she will do during her term.

2. Yes, working class was the main message. How many American broadcasts did you watch as a German who isn't interested in sports? Most likely a grand zero. You hardly posted in this thread before the election either, so you are pretty much stumbling in here blindly and running with the limited information you like the most. That's why sundin is saying that you must live in an alternate reality, and he is right in saying that. Which leads to your conclusion...

3. ...that is inevitably off base because your premise what the Harris campaign was about is so wrong already. It's also rich that you accuse me of denial after deliberately snipping my post to leave out the part where I placed blame on the Democrats.

https://kamalaharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Policy_Book_Economic-Opportunity.pdf

Just read the bullet points on page 3, that's what Harris ran on.

And yet... working class peoples lives got worse during the Biden administration while rich people got richer.

And yet... if asked (which AOC did) many people say working class problems.

You and many of the more wealthy middle class are fine with what Biden/Harris did. Many people are not, they are angry and feels like the Democrats act like their worries don't matter. That is the result that can be seen. Now you can deny it or you can ask why. You seem to invest all your energy on denial.

I wasn't very active in the thread, because I had over the last elections mostly lost the belief that the Democrats can tackle real issues. In the last elections Sanders did run in the primaries and brought on a lot of these issues. The big loss this time may have been a chance that the Democrats wake up and listen to the poorer, less educated, working class people. But you and others here keep convincing me that the Democrats aren't willing to change, to not even see any reason to do so. I don't think they will do much better in the future given this. I also don't think this will work out in Austria either, have fun with the FPÖ.

The democrats in the US did move to the right over the years, allowing the Republicans to go even more extreme right. If the democrats are not willing to change course, I believe we need a new real left movement. And not only in the US, europe sees similar problems with many establishment parties moving away from left positions while at the same time this gives room to fascist movements: Le Pen, AfD, FPÖ, Orban, PiS. I believe the antidote is bringing back real leftist movements with strong social and economic left policies. But most parties are afraid to piss off major companies and rich people, and yes, that includes the Democrats in the US. But that will be needed in my opinion.

As a leftist it is frustrating to discuss online. Issues and problems of people are denied. And you get accused of supporting the right, as you tried in the last post. So yeah, use the loss as a chance to reform or don't do anything and blame the voters.

I think people are mostly ignoring the big picture. Democrats are the middle class party and, as you noted, have taken a step to the right, so they¨re pretty much your typical European right wing party. Because US does not have a left wing party in the federal elections that would be a working class or lower classes party, it turns out that Republicans are at least giving an opportunity for the poor who can't do much worse, that the Democrats don't. As the low wage industrial jobs have gone abroad, especially the regions with lots of Africans have suffered from globalism.



Ei Kiinasti.

Eikä Japanisti.

Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.

 

Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.

BFR said:

Do the rest of us really need to see this "dirty laundry" in public?

If you were one of the people that wondered if this was about mod abuse, and the only response was that he got banned, that would be a worse look.

This is partially why we have a rule against complaining about moderator decisions on the forum, articles or on walls.
It's usually a lose-lose situation on both ends.

Chrkeller said:

I will just say Chazore is right and everyone knows it.  

Now I have a mod messaging me telling me I have self esteem issues.

I'm sure that is fine and appropriate behavior too.  

I don't know what Chazore said, and I hadn't heard about that PM until now.
It's from an exchange where you constantly call them a liar, despite them linking to a post demonstrating how you misremembered the order of events.
We'll discuss this in modchat, but this is part of why I asked you nicely to follow the rules and not make further mod complaints on the forum. Because people usually only mention their side of the story, leaving out all the context.

I also let you clarify clarify what the supposed threatening attacks on your wall meant.
You didn't do that either.
But since you mentioned the same thing in the aformentioned PM, it seems you were indeed talking about Ryu saying he will move your off-topic discussion about changing a tyre to your wall.
That's where off-topic discussions go, or to PM.
However, you can delete wall posts on your wall if you don't want to have them there.

Anyway, this is the end of this discussion in here.

Last edited by Hiku - 21 hours ago

jason1637 said:
The_Yoda said:

Was it election interference? Is Get Out the Vote also election interference or any other program that seeks to get voters registered?

Seems law professors were split and a judge ruled that it was not but I only took a surface level look.

A candidate paying people to vote is interference lol. Elon was directly working with the Trump Campaign. Whether Conservative like it or not the richest man in the world bought the election and Trump is likely to be his puppet. Trumps campaign spent $350m and Elon literally ran a $200m initiative to get him elected. If it wasnt for Elon Trump does not win.

Where is my understanding breaking down?  People were in a drawing for signing a petition and a prerequisite to win was that they were registered to vote not that they voted one way or another or even voted at all.  It was just that they were registered.  Registered to vote does not equal vote Trump. So where are people being paid to vote?

The biggest part of the sticky on the wicket was the money tied to being or getting registered.

As for Trump being beholden to Musk... maybe.  The Donald is such an ego maniac man child I don't know how much loyalty he has to anyone outside his family.  Trump being a Musk puppet is kind of a moot point anyway when most politicians are beholden to people other than the electorate anyway. At least in this instance we would know who is trying to pull his strings.



LurkerJ said:
IkePoR said:

This doesn't work for liberals.  There aren't any reliable independents on their side that aren't race grifting, hyper woke, or medically induced spergs.

Rich. With your hit and run posts you sound like someone who just stumbled onto 4chan and have a hard time containing their retarded thoughts from flowing like verbal diarrhoea.

Wow you're really sperging out you should probably calm down.



"You should be banned. Youre clearly flaming the president and even his brother who you know nothing about. Dont be such a partisan hack"

Mnementh said:

And yet... working class peoples lives got worse during the Biden administration while rich people got richer.

And yet... if asked (which AOC did) many people say working class problems.

You and many of the more wealthy middle class are fine with what Biden/Harris did. Many people are not, they are angry and feels like the Democrats act like their worries don't matter. That is the result that can be seen. Now you can deny it or you can ask why. You seem to invest all your energy on denial.

I wasn't very active in the thread, because I had over the last elections mostly lost the belief that the Democrats can tackle real issues. In the last elections Sanders did run in the primaries and brought on a lot of these issues. The big loss this time may have been a chance that the Democrats wake up and listen to the poorer, less educated, working class people. But you and others here keep convincing me that the Democrats aren't willing to change, to not even see any reason to do so. I don't think they will do much better in the future given this. I also don't think this will work out in Austria either, have fun with the FPÖ.

The democrats in the US did move to the right over the years, allowing the Republicans to go even more extreme right. If the democrats are not willing to change course, I believe we need a new real left movement. And not only in the US, europe sees similar problems with many establishment parties moving away from left positions while at the same time this gives room to fascist movements: Le Pen, AfD, FPÖ, Orban, PiS. I believe the antidote is bringing back real leftist movements with strong social and economic left policies. But most parties are afraid to piss off major companies and rich people, and yes, that includes the Democrats in the US. But that will be needed in my opinion.

As a leftist it is frustrating to discuss online. Issues and problems of people are denied. And you get accused of supporting the right, as you tried in the last post. So yeah, use the loss as a chance to reform or don't do anything and blame the voters.

Looks like you didn't even bother to click on the link I provided.

The problems for the working class are real, so these people should vote for the party that will work to improve their situation. That's the basic and logical premise. When these people then go vote someone who will make things worse for them, because the other option only ever makes incremental improvements instead of a big splash, then you absolutely have to question the intelligence of voters. Bernie Sanders put this into the political correct form in that he blamed the Democrats for not getting the message across whereas Donald Trump had provided an explanation for why the working class is suffering; Sanders summed up Trump's reasoning and immediately denounced it as bullshit which implicitly means as much as voters allowed themselves to get fooled. Of course Sanders and other actual left-wing politicians are using the Democrats' loss to boost the importance of their own agenda, but I doubt that he's happy that it has played out this way, because he knows that the Democrats had the better policies in this election.

It's funny that you bring up the FPÖ in Austria who got the most votes, but doomed itself to watch the next government from the sidelines. You bring up the FPÖ as a zinger, but it smacks you right back in the face because it shows how little you follow politics. People who voted for the FPÖ are either evil or stupid, and yes, you can and have to blame voters because all of them make their own decision. They are not getting coerced, threatened or anything else like that. It's a free choice.



Legend11 correctly predicted that GTA IV will outsell Super Smash Bros. Brawl. I was wrong.