By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Why I dislike Microsoft and why you should think twice about trusting them.

You shouldn't trust any global operating, multi-billion dollar company. Seriously.



Official member of VGC's Nintendo family, approved by the one and only RolStoppable. I feel honored.

Around the Network
Tamron said:

While this entire thread is just opinion I would like to point out a few glaring issues.

gamemaster4747 said:

My last blog was a review, and I got no responses at all. No one seemed to like it

gamemaster4747 said:

This is not meant to troll or incite anger from Xbox fans in a trollish way. Rather this is to show Xbox fans and all people what dirty lies MS has told us. Then decide for yourselves if you want to keep supporting what I consider a corrupt company.

By your own admission it seems more geared towards generating a response than showing xbox fans 'the light'.

gamemaster4747 said:

Sure, Sony has lied a bit, as well as Nintendo. I still have some anger about Sony abandoning the PSP to PSP Go UMD transfer program. But MS takes the cake here! I have some links to another article and an insulting MS video which is clearly deceptive. Plus I have some memories of a MS lie or two myself.

That is simply being deceptive and selectional, all three companies have made promises/lies/empty claims extensively throughout their tenure in the games industry, neither one is especially better than the other in that regard.

gamemaster4747 said:

Now that you have read this informative article, here is a link to a new Xbox One commercial which is clearly deceptive to those that are more casual and don't know the difference between XB1 with and without Kinect. This video has tons of Kinect features shown, but advertises the $399 Xbox without Kinect at the end. Here is the Youtube link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QN6Fz67wLv8 . This video upsets me the most.

This is just simple marketing, I have seen adverts for playstation that show move, lightguns and all sorts of other accessories then show a pricetag for the console, just as ive seen Wii adverts where everyone is playing, 4 remotes!, then lists the pricetag for a console with just one, that is purely marketing, they want to show off the product in the best light and show you what possibilities lay before you should you jump on board with the product, you are simply seeing it negatively, again selectively, because you have a preconveived opinion going in.

gamemaster4747 said:

Now my own words. My first memory of Microsoft's lying is when they said the original Xbox was upgradable. Not only did this not happen, but they abandoned the original Xbox in only around four years--which is a short console cycle--in favor of the 360 and demanded that 3rd party companies switch to 360 right away. A more recent lie is that MS said that there would never be an XB1 without Kinect. Another lie. They said that Kinect was intregal to the XB1 and that they wanted XB1 to be a multimedia center. Well, suddenly it's all about the games when Xbox is losing in it's home territory! MS has not been all about the games for years now. C'mon MS!

MS has recently pulled a copycat of the Sony strategy in multiple ways. Games with Gold=PS Plus instant game collection. No more subscription needed for apps, just like PS Plus. $399 console, just like PS4. What bothers me more is that MS is not compensating the early adopters of XB1 for this new Kinectless XB1. The early buyers were told that Kinect was there to stay and was to be an important strategy for XB1, not a side peripheral. MS will undoubtedly downscale it's games for Kinect and stop improving it as much as they would have if they kept Kinect in every box. Now those that paid $500 are stuck with an accessory instead of an important part of the XB1 experience. They should have kept Kinect and just swallowed the $100 loss for awhile. It's not like they can't afford it.

As far as i remember the software on the xbox was upgradable, but the hardware was not, and i do not recall ever reading that it was ever going to be, either.

As for the rest, there have been a number of large changes at microsoft and these changes ultimately include new people in charge of planning, pr and strategy, if your product isnt selling as well as the competitor, then it only makes sense to try to emulate what it is thats making the competitor sell better, everyone copies everyone else, not because they want to but because it's a business, they pretty much HAVE to. Unless of course you're trying to argue that a businesses first priority isn't to make money.

gamemaster4747 said:

Lastly, though it's not a lie, the constant red ring of death problem with the 360 for years, showed that MS didn't care about the gamers very much when they rushed 360 out the gate, and the fact that it took a class action lawsuit to get MS to extend 360's warranty to 3 years for the arguably poorest constructed game console ever, makes them an untrustworthy company in my opinion.

Clearly this is a biased blog, but one with much truth involved and no trolling whatsoever. Thanks for reading.

A little like dead optical drives on virtually every console with optical drives, NES cart slots and the whole blowing the cart thing, gameboy game batteries dying and losing saves, ps2 DRE, ps3 YLOD, game gear capacitors, gameboy color sound issues and so on and so on, electronics are prone to unforseen technical issues and to a huge extent the introduction of RoHS is to blame.

Console realiability took a nose dive with the introduction of RoHS compliance and BGA components suffered the worst, around the time of the Xbox 360 launch the PC scene was suffering from an extensive epidemic that began with RoHS compliances introduction and was still rife with issues many years later, it's only improved manufacturing and better component design that has slowly calmed that beast, either way to single out RROD as if it was the only notable issue is flat out wrong, since you're a gamer, to you it was simply the most documented and talked about.

While I appreciate that this thread is simply your opinion, and I respect what you personally believe, I can honestly say that I don't personally agree with anything you've said, and suspect that the point was simply to garner a response rather than make a solid argument for your opinion.

Welcome new user.

Live long and prosper.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

tagging this to read later on, seems like fun.



Why not check me out on youtube and help me on the way to 2k subs over at www.youtube.com/stormcloudlive

Poorly constructed arguments, lacks reasoning and totally ignores the sins perpetrated by other companies as many posters have already outlined in this thread.



Xbox 360 and Xbox One

Gamertag:  GamertagOz70

kowenicki said:
Lets be honest. This is a biased rant based on low knowledge of the situations you 'discuss' and from a starting point if hatred and a very skewed, almost, paranoid view of the world. I worry for you.

I'm also bemused that a mod has commented and left this open. Frankly, that stinks.

We're talking about it and we shall decide whether or not the thread should be locked or not, thanks.

So long as comments similar to this one from you are left out then I agree with starcraft. For now.

 

Indeed, for now the thread is teetering on the verge of turning into a flame war. Today is the day of E3, so we really don't want to ban anyone. So please, no unwarranted attacks on the OP or anyone else in the thread!



 

Here lies the dearly departed Nintendomination Thread.

Around the Network

I mean all you need to do to see Microsoft's Xbox strategy is look at all of their other market strategies:  Leech off the winners.

-The Zune was a failed attempt to leech off the iPod's success.

-The Surface Tablet was a failed attempt to leech off the iPad's success.

-Xbox is trying to leech off of Playstation's success, and I suppose they have done a good job of it compared to their other ventures.

 

The sooner MS gets out of the console business, the sooner they will stop holding back the console business and make PC gaming as strong as it should be.  Honestly if it wasn't for Valve, PC gaming probablt would have all but died in 2005.



Wow I must say I am surprised this is still open. I think I might have been banned for less, less words at least. That's not a complaint mind you just curious and trying to put this in perspective with my few past offenses. 

I learned in a writing class in highschool that one of the biggest parts of writing anything really is basically truncation. Removing as much as possible so it's clear and to the point so let me try that with the op. The title is:

"

Why I dislike Microsoft and why you should think twice about trusting them.

The body should be: "Because you really shouldn't trust anyone  ever really...especially a corporation of any kind. it's basic common sense" - The end.

 

That doesn't mean that you shouldn't distrust them to the point you will never do business with them. It's not like they are commiting genocide or anything as far as we know...(I'm looking at you Nintendo! why don't you tell us why there are so few toadstools walkin about yet so many mushrooms for Mario? WHAT ARE YOU HIDING!)

What it means is that you should always keep an eye on them, and do your research before you make any kind of purchase. That's why it's important to not let distrust/hate or trust/loyalty blind you to reality. Facts are important and ya can't see them for what they are if you got blinders on. Without seeing them as they are you can either miss out on something great or set yourself up for huge dissapointment. That's pretty much why MS is in bad shape now, they didn't have a strong, clear, and coherent message at the start. No one really knew what the facts were for sure and there was entirly too much contradiction. Facts are also fluid and change with time. Sure you can't change the past, and sure there are some things you can't take back or walk away from. So far none of the game companies to my knowledge have reached that point yet. So we should show them at least some forgivness and give them a chance to make up for past mistakes and hopefully make the future a brighter one.

Also just a bit of advice, I don't think anyone cares what you or anyone else loves/hates trusts/distrusts. I mean I don't know but.....hey,,,you,,,,yeah you..the one reading this..Honestly tell me do you care about what anyone else here loves/hates or trusts/distrusts? Probably not. I can only speak for myself but the only time I care is when it overtakes people's perception of reality and causes them to make terrible...terrible arguments. It just makes me feel bad, it's like Old Yeller foaming at the mouth 

I mean if you want people to interact on your posts you could do what some people do. That's create click-bait/flamebait, or post insane predictions and spend pages and pages just goading people with nonsense completely disregarding logic, reality, and just about anything anyone else says. Just filling the pages with intentional delusion and insanity. Or you can do something different by posting something that excites and entices people, or brings them together and challenges assumptions and preconcieved notions. Ya know instead of splooging assumptions and preconcieved notions all over everything and everyone..




http://www.youtube.com/v/AoOOpLpcF28 http://www.youtube.com/v/CphFZGH5030

All Hail the Jester King. The King is back, and I am still a dirty girl prof ;)

S.T.A.G.E. said:
Ka-pi96 said:
Alot of the 'lies' you say Microsoft have said other companies have done as well. The Xbox One changes should also be commended rather than criticised as they were fixing their mistakes and it would have been much worse if they had stuck to how they originally planned to do things.


MS did lie to all of us and they didnt change their ways to be nice. It was because Sony was beating them.

What you just said is how competition works.  Sony did not change their ways until they were getting beat by MS and Nintendo.  As always you have this warm and fuzzy feeling about Sony when they make changes or do good but never seem to recognize that competition made Sony change.  

Really, why anyone would love any large corporation always escapes me.  You should never trust any of these companies as they all have a pass where they were on top they tried to stifle competition.  Its what corporations do and just because a company is on the bottom trying to gain consumers trust because they have no choice doesn't mean they should be trusted anymore than the company on Topic throwing their weight around.



Nintendo said they didn't want to put DLC in their games at first and now they do, but I don't think you can blame them for that. A company has to go with the time and if that contradicts an earlier statement, let it be so. I don't see how Microsoft intentionally said to themselves "let's lie to our costumers about the XOne's kinectless future"



So they've seen their competitors do well and so have adopted many similar strategies? Shocking!

Also, Sony has done more than just 'lie a bit'. Google 'Sony Rootkit'. They have broken the law in the past to protect their IP. They can't be trusted. I love Nintendo games but wouldn't trust them either as far as I could throw Reggie. These people want your money and aren't your friends. Microsoft just has the balls to do it to your face. Competition is the only thing keeping them in check.