The Road to 160m+ for Nintendo Switch

[XtremeBG]

Phenomajp13 said:

Didn't Shawn Layden just recently confirm the 160.6 million was legit? If so, wouldn't that be the reason Rol is no longer mentioning the theoretical range? I'm failing to understand what you don't comprehend here. We had that image for awhile yes but it was never confirmed to be legit. Since it wasn't confirmed to be legit, the best estimate we had was that theoretical range. Shawn Layden has now confirmed the image legit, putting the theoretical range to bed. Rol didn't mention it in that recent post, possibly because Rol has commonsense and understands Sony has spoken and the theoretical range is now no longer valid. Only the desperate goalpost movers need it now.

Yes, Layden did. However this still doesn't change the fact that you doubt there are such a people mentioning this and I just proved you are wrong for 300th time. Confirming 160.6M produced, doesn't change the fact the the people who I said were talking aren't imaginary. And that in future when Switch get's close to that number, some PS2 lovers may do desperate debates with that 161.8M theoretical max. Your mistake here is that you again tried to make it look like, that I am those future persons or that I say the Switch needs 162M or that I move the goalpost, when all I said was simply that there will be such people, nothing more. And in order for them to shut up for good, 162M would be the number which will kill every doubt and debate they can possibly do.

Last edited by XtremeBG - 23 hours ago