By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Phenomajp13 said:

I clearly know the meaning which you just described amd literally did lol. Can you stop all the victim nonsense, no one is targeting you. I don't care about seeing post from you lol, I enjoy critiquing them. Continue to post, you have already given me plenty of laughs. Seeing you and plenty of other posters here including even a mod doubt the 160 million prediction from Rol and you think I want you to stop? I have gotten great joy out of seeing posters like you explain your logic today for why it won't make it and then have excuses out the butt the next day when they realize they were wrong. You don't think I find that entertaining? Remember I asked you to explain how you knew the Switch had all these advantages including an entire 240 million handheld base exclusively to itself and yet you still came to the conclusion it wouldn't make it? It's almost like you didn't decide all these advantages were advantages until you realized Switch is getting too close!

I described it but I haven't done it. Nowhere have I said the Switch (or any other console) that it wouldn't be successful if it weren't for some of the reason I am giving. I've always said that they only helped. Each of them add couple of millions to the total number. That's it. Not targeting me, at the same time quoting me and debating my posts with answer every time after this with over 10 replies for the whole thing. This is targeting.

I never said Switch had 240 million base for itself. I've just said, that because of this, handheld market has reached higher points therefore handheld market now reaching 170M is not mind blowing (reply to @javi741 ). As he and I discussed, from there on out, the smartphones have taken some portion of those 240M. It's still impressive for a console to reach 150-160M or even 170M if it reach them in the end, however, for the handheld console market, it's not so mind blowing since it's been even higher before. That was the only point I wanted to made and made with my original reply to @javi741 . And when you saw the word Switch in there you jumped right away, like always. You like to put words in the people's mouth, I noticed that couple of times now, doing it with me, and with others here too. That's not speaking well for your personality @Phenomajp13. Switch obviously does not have those 240M for itself, otherwise it would've been at least 220-230M by now, not 140M. And yes, if Nintendo don't drop it to 149$/199$/249$ or less and does in fact release the Switch 2 next year, I am making the point that the Switch won't make it to 170M. And 160M are very doubting of this moment as well. I can only see 170M happening in 2 cases, either decent price cut for the Switch 1 and delaying Switch 2 to at least 2026, or launching it next year but having decent difference in the price of both, let's say something like 200$ or more.

Also I've written posts, reasoning, explaining Switch's sales trajectory, advantages and disadvantages (and all the other consoles of course) and giving predictions as well, since a long time, not from recently. Most people know or may remember, that I started to write here actively since 2019. So it's not when I realized Switch is getting close to 150M or 160M, it was all the way back when Switch was in it's 40ties million. Someone haven't read the history and didn't informed himself on something he is saying constantly for the last 1 year...

Last edited by XtremeBG - 16 hours ago

My sales comparison threads:

Ultimate Showdowns: JP 2023 / JP 2024 / 2024 / 2023 / 20222021

Lifetime Showdown / Historical Showdown / YOY Charts / 140M+ Club Chart / Quantity of Games