|Mr Puggsly said:|
"What crime stats shows otherwise." I look at the stats of crimes for the country. You can even see the number of murders for individual states or cities. Chicago has the most murders and that's why its a favorite example and its controlled by dems. Just to clarify, the biggest pile of murdered bodies.
"I have no clue about San Fran, what about it." The dems control it and it has turned into shit. If you don't know any specifics, that's okay. People that oppose the left tend to be aware of which major cities are falling apart and who is in power.
"The problem is you never actually listed anything. You stated about bad policy but cannot produce one policy." I did a quick search and found this... https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/03/22/key-facts-about-u-s-immigration-policies-and-bidens-proposed-changes/
"we go into it more indebt." For the record, indebt is not a word. "In debt" is but not relevant. What you mean is, "in depth."
"If that is too much reading I understand, its way easier to just form an opinion from headlines then really understanding a particular issue." You should educate judges, not me.
"What exactly is the LGBT and BLM have in common." Pinkos.
Sundin did a pretty good job of answering you on the crime stat and the immigration which I might add I am still wondering if we will ever get anything concrete from you on the policy that you believe is bringing chaos to the boarder.
What part of San Fran is shit and what policy from the Dems contribute to it. Why would I know any specifics since you did not give any. I do not live in San Fran so why would I care. Enlighten me on the data that supports your opinion. Nothing is easier then throwing out some opinion with absolutely nothing more to it then "Its controlled by Dems". As I always find when you ask people on specifics well they seem to never have any. Its the reason why I feel the majority of the time context just seems to escape you. All you need is that a Dem controls something and that's it but you cannot provide anything else which show a lack of even cursory attempt to look at the issues.
Thank your for correcting my spelling of inDebt, now that we got that out of the way, did you actually read the articles or did you just do what I knew you would do and ignore it.
I actually do not need to educate the judges because the issue I linked about no judge overruled it. Maybe you need to actually look at the issue first before responding. Is it really that hard to go deeper into an issue besides the cursory aspect you seem to show. Most of your opinions seem to be just that cursory. If a headline says something, you probably never actually read it as long as it appear to support your opinion.
So let me ask this question, do you fear socialism.