By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - Bloomberg: Nintendo Traders Signal Switch Could Be Bigger Hit Than the Wii

KLXVER said:
Soundwave said:

That was my round about way of saying it, but sure. Zelda is clearly what's driving Switch adoption, if they didn't have that game at launch they could very easily be in a world of trouble right now. 

Many of us would love Nintendo to stick to core games only, but its just not going to happen. Best we can hope for is a BOTW every 5 years with some DKC, Mario Odyssey and Splatoon like games sprinkled in every now and then.

This is a problem then, because they need to get games like BOTW out more often than that. 

It's not just BoTW either ... Splatoon was made in like 2 years flat ... so you can create games that appeal to a new generation of gamers and not require 5 years.

They would also be well advised to make sure Mario Odyessy is the GOTY type candidate and not accept anything less. 

They should look at other genre types that are popular today too, I mention FPS', ARMS looks like a decent take on the Street Fighter concept. 



Around the Network
Wyrdness said:
Mnementh said:

That comparison is ridiculous. As the reference is the day before launch, expectations are priced into the reference. For the Wii the expectations were high before launch, so it's shares were already traded high on launch day. WiiU obviously was after launch below expectations, Switch is above. But I doubt the expectations were as high as with Wii to begin with.

Where did you get this mate because expectations for the Wii were far from high people back then were predicting that gen to be the one Nintendo does a SEGA.

 Don't get this from gaming forums. People outside gaming were buzzing about Wii. And that actually made it successful.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

Soundwave said:
KLXVER said:

Many of us would love Nintendo to stick to core games only, but its just not going to happen. Best we can hope for is a BOTW every 5 years with some DKC, Mario Odyssey and Splatoon like games sprinkled in every now and then.

This is a problem then, because they need to get games like BOTW out more often than that. 

It's not just BoTW either ... Splatoon was made in like 2 years flat ... so you can create games that appeal to a new generation of gamers and not require 5 years.

They would also be well advised to make sure Mario Odyessy is the GOTY type candidate and not accept anything less. 

They should look at other genre types that are popular today too, I mention FPS', ARMS looks like a decent take on the Street Fighter concept. 

ARMS is not anything like Street Fighter. Even Smash Bros is way closer to it.

They wont make anything close to BOTW with any other franchise than Zelda. Its just too time-consuming and expensive for them I think.

Sure Splatoon did well and now we get Splatoon 2 instead of the team making something new. They are just the Splatoon team now. Nothing else until that franchise is slowing down.

This is just how Nintendo works. Why spend 4-5 years making a big epic game, when you can make 5 casual ones in that time that will cost WAY less combined. At least we are getting games like BOTW, Mario Odyssey and XC2. Maybe a few more big games, but nothing close to BOTW other than the next big Zelda.



KLXVER said:
Soundwave said:

This is a problem then, because they need to get games like BOTW out more often than that. 

It's not just BoTW either ... Splatoon was made in like 2 years flat ... so you can create games that appeal to a new generation of gamers and not require 5 years.

They would also be well advised to make sure Mario Odyessy is the GOTY type candidate and not accept anything less. 

They should look at other genre types that are popular today too, I mention FPS', ARMS looks like a decent take on the Street Fighter concept. 

ARMS is not anything like Street Fighter. Even Smash Bros is way closer to it.

They wont make anything close to BOTW with any other franchise than Zelda. Its just too time-consuming and expensive for them I think.

Sure Splatoon did well and now we get Splatoon 2 instead of the team making something new. They are just the Splatoon team now. Nothing else until that franchise is slowing down.

This is just how Nintendo works. Why spend 4-5 years making a big epic game, when you can make 5 casual ones in that time that will cost WAY less combined. At least we are getting games like BOTW, Mario Odyssey and XC2. Maybe a few more big games, but nothing close to BOTW other than the next big Zelda.

ARMS is an example of taking a familiar genre type (1 vs 1 3D arena fighter) and putting a Nintendo spin on it, which is fine. They should look at other popular genres and try that, specifically genres that are popular in the West. 



Soundwave said:
KLXVER said:

ARMS is not anything like Street Fighter. Even Smash Bros is way closer to it.

They wont make anything close to BOTW with any other franchise than Zelda. Its just too time-consuming and expensive for them I think.

Sure Splatoon did well and now we get Splatoon 2 instead of the team making something new. They are just the Splatoon team now. Nothing else until that franchise is slowing down.

This is just how Nintendo works. Why spend 4-5 years making a big epic game, when you can make 5 casual ones in that time that will cost WAY less combined. At least we are getting games like BOTW, Mario Odyssey and XC2. Maybe a few more big games, but nothing close to BOTW other than the next big Zelda.

ARMS is an example of taking a familiar genre type (1 vs 1 3D arena fighter) and putting a Nintendo spin on it, which is fine. They should look at other popular genres and try that, specifically genres that are popular in the West. 

Well they have. WRPGs and Shooters. Maybe they can make more sports and sim racing games.



Around the Network
Wyrdness said:
Mnementh said:

That comparison is ridiculous. As the reference is the day before launch, expectations are priced into the reference. For the Wii the expectations were high before launch, so it's shares were already traded high on launch day. WiiU obviously was after launch below expectations, Switch is above. But I doubt the expectations were as high as with Wii to begin with.

Where did you get this mate because expectations for the Wii were far from high people back then were predicting that gen to be the one Nintendo does a SEGA.

Or to illustrate my point...

Nintendo-share in the year leading up to the Wii-launch: https://de.finance.yahoo.com/chart/NTO.F#eyJjdXN0b21SYW5nZUVuZCI6MTE2Mzk3NzE5OSwiY3VzdG9tUmFuZ2VTdGFydCI6MTEzMjQzNzYwMCwibXVsdGlDb2xvckxpbmUiOmZhbHNlLCJib2xsaW5nZXJVcHBlckNvbG9yIjoiI2UyMDA4MSIsImJvbGxpbmdlckxvd2VyQ29sb3IiOiIjOTU1MmZmIiwibWZpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiIzQ1ZTNmZiIsIm1hY2REaXZlcmdlbmNlQ29sb3IiOiIjZmY3YjEyIiwibWFjZE1hY2RDb2xvciI6IiM3ODdkODIiLCJtYWNkU2lnbmFsQ29sb3IiOiIjMDAwMDAwIiwicnNpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiI2ZmYjcwMCIsInN0b2NoS0xpbmVDb2xvciI6IiNmZmI3MDAiLCJzdG9jaERMaW5lQ29sb3IiOiIjNDVlM2ZmIn0%3D

Nintendo-share in the year leading up to the Switch-launch: https://de.finance.yahoo.com/chart/NTO.F#eyJjdXN0b21SYW5nZUVuZCI6MTQ4ODU4MTk5OSwiY3VzdG9tUmFuZ2VTdGFydCI6MTQ1NzA0MjQwMCwibXVsdGlDb2xvckxpbmUiOmZhbHNlLCJib2xsaW5nZXJVcHBlckNvbG9yIjoiI2UyMDA4MSIsImJvbGxpbmdlckxvd2VyQ29sb3IiOiIjOTU1MmZmIiwibWZpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiIzQ1ZTNmZiIsIm1hY2REaXZlcmdlbmNlQ29sb3IiOiIjZmY3YjEyIiwibWFjZE1hY2RDb2xvciI6IiM3ODdkODIiLCJtYWNkU2lnbmFsQ29sb3IiOiIjMDAwMDAwIiwicnNpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiI2ZmYjcwMCIsInN0b2NoS0xpbmVDb2xvciI6IiNmZmI3MDAiLCJzdG9jaERMaW5lQ29sb3IiOiIjNDVlM2ZmIn0%3D

As you can see, the year before the Wii-launch the Nintendo-share was on a constant rise. So the market was already building up expectations about the Wii. On the other hand last year, you had on big jump in expectation, but after that more or less constant value of the share. So the market was cautious. After launch the Wii matched expectations, that's why the share grew slowly but steady and Switch topped expectations, that's why the stronger growth.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

Mnementh said:
Wyrdness said:

Where did you get this mate because expectations for the Wii were far from high people back then were predicting that gen to be the one Nintendo does a SEGA.

Or to illustrate my point...

Nintendo-share in the year leading up to the Wii-launch: https://de.finance.yahoo.com/chart/NTO.F#eyJjdXN0b21SYW5nZUVuZCI6MTE2Mzk3NzE5OSwiY3VzdG9tUmFuZ2VTdGFydCI6MTEzMjQzNzYwMCwibXVsdGlDb2xvckxpbmUiOmZhbHNlLCJib2xsaW5nZXJVcHBlckNvbG9yIjoiI2UyMDA4MSIsImJvbGxpbmdlckxvd2VyQ29sb3IiOiIjOTU1MmZmIiwibWZpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiIzQ1ZTNmZiIsIm1hY2REaXZlcmdlbmNlQ29sb3IiOiIjZmY3YjEyIiwibWFjZE1hY2RDb2xvciI6IiM3ODdkODIiLCJtYWNkU2lnbmFsQ29sb3IiOiIjMDAwMDAwIiwicnNpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiI2ZmYjcwMCIsInN0b2NoS0xpbmVDb2xvciI6IiNmZmI3MDAiLCJzdG9jaERMaW5lQ29sb3IiOiIjNDVlM2ZmIn0%3D

Nintendo-share in the year leading up to the Switch-launch: https://de.finance.yahoo.com/chart/NTO.F#eyJjdXN0b21SYW5nZUVuZCI6MTQ4ODU4MTk5OSwiY3VzdG9tUmFuZ2VTdGFydCI6MTQ1NzA0MjQwMCwibXVsdGlDb2xvckxpbmUiOmZhbHNlLCJib2xsaW5nZXJVcHBlckNvbG9yIjoiI2UyMDA4MSIsImJvbGxpbmdlckxvd2VyQ29sb3IiOiIjOTU1MmZmIiwibWZpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiIzQ1ZTNmZiIsIm1hY2REaXZlcmdlbmNlQ29sb3IiOiIjZmY3YjEyIiwibWFjZE1hY2RDb2xvciI6IiM3ODdkODIiLCJtYWNkU2lnbmFsQ29sb3IiOiIjMDAwMDAwIiwicnNpTGluZUNvbG9yIjoiI2ZmYjcwMCIsInN0b2NoS0xpbmVDb2xvciI6IiNmZmI3MDAiLCJzdG9jaERMaW5lQ29sb3IiOiIjNDVlM2ZmIn0%3D

As you can see, the year before the Wii-launch the Nintendo-share was on a constant rise. So the market was already building up expectations about the Wii. On the other hand last year, you had on big jump in expectation, but after that more or less constant value of the share. So the market was cautious. After launch the Wii matched expectations, that's why the share grew slowly but steady and Switch topped expectations, that's why the stronger growth.

when i go to the links, nothing shows up.

Either way, im pretty sure much of that rise was from DS. DS had a relatively slow start, it wasnt bad but it was initially tracking behind GBA and PSP was a strong competitor (PSP actually sold better than DS in 2005 outside of Japan).

However, in Spring 2006 DS had the DS Lite revision and some really killer software like New Super Mario Bros (first original DS Mario in 14 years), Brain Age & Pokemon Diamond/Pearl (in Japan) along with the big Fall 2005 titles like Animal Crossing, Mario Kart & Nintendogs showing great legs. This led to DS sales skyrocketing and went on to sell over 20 million in 2006 and was up nearly 100% YOY.



When the herd loses its way, the shepard must kill the bull that leads them astray.

It might because it's a replacement for the handheld as well as the home console. Nintendo's handhelds have always been successful. On the other hand, it might suffer bad sales BECAUSE it is a home console combined with a portable console.



I wouldn't call that a reliable indicator on how well the console will do in the long term. We're in a totally different place now than we were back in 06, with the mobile market, and with Nintendo having entered it, and the fact that this is a hybrid system. It'll be interesting to see how this turns out



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

 

Soundwave said:
zorg1000 said:

You are really good at arguing against things people never said.

Point remains -- 100 mill is likely not happening with a new breakout IP that sells *a lot* and brings in an audience that wouldn't otherwise in most likelyhood have purchased the system. 

Wii Sports obviously did that for the Wii, but it's not the only singular example of that. 

1,2 Switch is basically Nintendo's attempt at making a Wii Sports though and it's nowhere close, that's all I'm saying is they don't right now have *that* game.

 

All the Pokemons and Mario Kart and Smash Bros. and 2D Mario and 3D Mario only got the 3DS to 65 million even after an extended life cycle of 6 full years. So if the Switch is more or less going to rely on these IP plus Splatoon .... I dunno if that makes up the difference from 65 mill to 100 mill. You need to have something huge break out and Nintendo has not had a lot of luck trying to find that game since the industry changed 6-7 years ago. 

That said as I've said before I don't think 100 million in itself is that big of a deal. I would rather have 70 million on the basis of a loyal customer base that plays video games intently rather than a wishy washy crowd of 100 million that could jump ship at any moment. 

You are wrong, look for instance best selling games of best selling console ever (PS2), in top 10 best selling games on PS2 almost none of them is new IP, you basically now have same situation with PS4.

Wii Sports was one kind of game for any console or handheld out there, not just for Wii. Zelda BotW also is not Wii Sports but it will be definitely one of biggest system sellers ever out there, that is game that will sell Switch through years, Zelda BotW will be Switchs GTAV.

3DS will end up around 70m but its not selling "only 70m" and less than 100m beacuse doesnt have "a new breakout IP that sells" but fact is this 3DS needed to fight against mobile phones and tablets, that wasn't case with any previous handheld.

So no, its not point that you must "to have a new breakout IP that sells" like Wii Sports, actually also stronge point is to have marketable and more appealing hardware, and Switch is definitely more marketable and more appealing hardware than 3DS is (nobady cares about 3D). Switch like handheld and console we will have much more appealing on market because it hybrid, real home console and real handheld in one, its aiming both markets in same time, that wasn't case with 3DS or any Nintendo hardware. Of Course that doesn't meant automatically better sales than 3DS or Wii, because there are many thing go in account if we talk about LT numbers.

Also you dont know that Switch will rely only on existing IPs, actually it's seems that Nintendo is more willing to invest in new IPs after Splatoon, we already have ARMS only few months after launch.

 

Soundwave said:
KLXVER said:

Many of us would love Nintendo to stick to core games only, but its just not going to happen. Best we can hope for is a BOTW every 5 years with some DKC, Mario Odyssey and Splatoon like games sprinkled in every now and then.

This is a problem then, because they need to get games like BOTW out more often than that. 

It's not just BoTW either ... Splatoon was made in like 2 years flat ... so you can create games that appeal to a new generation of gamers and not require 5 years.

They would also be well advised to make sure Mario Odyessy is the GOTY type candidate and not accept anything less. 

They should look at other genre types that are popular today too, I mention FPS', ARMS looks like a decent take on the Street Fighter concept. 

You need to be realistic, games critically acclaimed like BotW that are basically one best games ever, are usually one game per generation per platform, you will hardly have multiple games like those in one gen per platform.

Splatoon is difrent kind of game, its not critically acclaimed like BotW but it has mass appeling and huge popularity, and Nintendo already trying to achive something similar with ARMS, and probably we will see some more new IPs on Switch.

Yes, Mario Odyssey seem like another must have Switch title with metascore of around 95 and GOTY. So basically two GOTY and even possible GOTG games in its 9 months of console on market.

ARMS is like Splatoon, its Nintendo take on fighting games similar like Splatoon is their take on shooters.

 

curl-6 said:

It is way, way too early to be talking about Switch outselling the Wii. Sure, it has had a strong launch, but so did the Dreamcast and Wii U.

Let's see how it's selling this time next year.

Wii U had strong launch, but everything about Wii U was very negative despite strong launch, in comparison everything about Switch looks much more positive, not to mentione that Switch broke some records, it has one best games ever like launch game and other very strong games will be out in 1st 9 months of console on market, and demand seems much higher than was for Wii U.

 

Soundwave said:
curl-6 said:

It is way, way too early to be talking about Switch outselling the Wii. Sure, it has had a strong launch, but so did the Dreamcast and Wii U.

Let's see how it's selling this time next year.

N64 could also be thrown into that mix. Selling through the first 2-3 million is the easy part. 

N64 had pretty bad launch on some markets and needed to receive fast price cut on those markets