By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS5 Pro revealed. November 7th 2024. $699

Tober said:

The PS5 PRo is a missed opportunity.

The Launch PS3 was really expensive too. BUT, it could play PS1 & PS2 games next to PS3 games. It replaced all of the earlier systems.

Imagine the PS5 PRO was launched being able to play EVERY generation of PS games. From PS1-PS5. It would need a discdrive standard though, but imagine all PS1-PS5 discs would simply work. Having such a system replacing 30 years of hardware would make me buy this system even at EUR 800.

Yea but the reality is how many people are really like you that Sony should put in the effort to do that? We have the data and most people are playing the same games day after day. Some random GAAS game out there or a sports title, whatever the newest one is.

Hell I'm getting the Pro day 1 and I could care less about playing old games like PS1 and 2. 3 is borderline for me but they've already upgraded Mass Effect so I don't need it. Even during the PS leaks the people paying for the highest tier of PS+ weren't using it to play any of the old game they are porting over that the tier gives you access to. 



Around the Network
method114 said:

Yea but the reality is how many people are really like you that Sony should put in the effort to do that? We have the data and most people are playing the same games day after day. Some random GAAS game out there or a sports title, whatever the newest one is.

Hell I'm getting the Pro day 1 and I could care less about playing old games like PS1 and 2. 3 is borderline for me but they've already upgraded Mass Effect so I don't need it. Even during the PS leaks the people paying for the highest tier of PS+ weren't using it to play any of the old game they are porting over that the tier gives you access to.

Its actually the opposite when it comes to the highest tier of PS+ IIRC. A lot of Sony's old catalog is leading the way for engagement for Premium. 



Kids will never know how amazing it felt to jump from a generation to the next.

And this sort of applies to technology in general. New automobile generations felt like the cars came from a different planet or something. Late 1970's to early 2000's will forever be my golden age.



Kyuu said:

Kids will never know how amazing it felt to jump from a generation to the next.

And this sort of applies to technology in general. New automobile generations felt like the cars came from a different planet or something. Late 1970's to early 2000's will forever be my golden age.

Exactly. 1990 to 2010s for me about the cars.



My sales comparison threads:

Ultimate Showdowns: JP 2023 / JP 2024 / 2024 / 2023 / 20222021

Lifetime Showdown / Historical Showdown / YOY Charts / 140M+ Club Chart / Quantity of Games

XtremeBG said:
SvennoJ said:

Online was indeed free, but also crap and offline for months after PSN got completely hacked. FTP games are still free to play online, but yes it sucks Sony followed and made paying for online mandatory. However PS3 was also rife with online passes, so it wasn't entirely free to play online. Second hand games you had to buy the online pass separately. (Or to play your disc online on a different account)

Europe models were not full BC, and to reduce price full BC capability was removed. Plus BC was a separate mode without any boost capability like the PS5 now has. I lost my FF12 saves due to a corrupted virtual memory card (I pressed the off button while it was still saving to virtual memory card I guess)
Btw thanks to the PS4 Pro, a lot of PS4 games make more use of PS5' extra power.

My PS3 controllers did break within 2 years. My 2 launch model PS3s did as well after 3 years.

But it did have the cheapest and best blu-ray player for a long time. Early dedicated blu-ray players at the time of PS3 release were slow, cost $2,000 and became obsolete because they couldn't get patched. PS3 did add 3D blu-ray support later through some magic.

PS3 was great, but expensive and had plenty issues. Modern consoles may suck, but try installing a game on PS3 again that had many patches. It takes days to get GT5 fully working again on a PS3 from original disc install... Patching, installing, OS in general, PS3 feels horribly slow nowadays. It's still a great blu-ray player though :)

Let's not glorify gen 7. I had 2x YloD, went through 7 ps3 controllers, 2x RRoD, 360 charge packs failed after 3 years, HDD failure in PS3 (months to redownload my digital games as I was still on a 60GB monthly limit connection), Disc drive failure in the Wii, Charge packs for Wii remotes all failed, Balance board connection failure. Gen 7 has been the worst for durability.

In addition to @Cerebralbore101 I will add also few things. Online pass was barely a thing, it was there for year at max, other than that you could play everything everywhere 10th hand if you want. Back compat, as I already told, you forget PS1 back compt, it was 100% there. PS1 is old now, but back then it was like playing PS3 games natively now at 100%, so it's a good thing. Also the backcompat with PS1 and PS2 was boosted, you could play all the games with upscaled settings in 1080p, of course it wasn't native 1080p but it was still better image quality than the original ones. Also I've installed many and many games on my PS3 and the only slow thing is in the very few exceptions when the game has many many big patches and you have to wait for hour or two until they are ready, but nowadays this applies for all the games and even last gen too. Other than the patches, PS3 games installed for no more than 5 to 10 minutes which is okay. Also you pointed out having problems with your HDD, because of that you may have had the problems of slower than normal installations. But like @Cerebralbore101 said, just because you hadn't had a luck with your time for 7th gen does not mean it wasn't good or durable. Gen 7 was the worst for durability only for the first 2 years of it's models of consoles, after that, those machines are one of the biggest tanks I've seen. On reddit, ebay and youtube, when I was doing the research of broken systems, there were more cases of broken PS4s and XB1s than later 360 and PS3 models, (excluding the latest cheap toys E model and Super slim, those two were a joke).

I just want to add that PS3 and 360 slim models while pretty reliable for their time, pale in comparison to how long a PS2 or GC will last. Once we got to thermal paste being in consoles the longevity really went down. Too much heat.



Around the Network

https://x.com/dark1x/status/1834227846358700336

Huge if true. A non-RT game with seemingly a "far better" image quality in performance mode on PS5 Pro than quality mode on PS5. Not to mention it's my GOTY and I intend to replay it on Hard Mode.

Man I wish the Pro underperforms sales wise so we get more frequent deals and maybe a price cut.



Cerebralbore101 said:
SvennoJ said:

Online was indeed free, but also crap and offline for months after PSN got completely hacked. FTP games are still free to play online, but yes it sucks Sony followed and made paying for online mandatory. However PS3 was also rife with online passes, so it wasn't entirely free to play online. Second hand games you had to buy the online pass separately. (Or to play your disc online on a different account)

Europe models were not full BC, and to reduce price full BC capability was removed. Plus BC was a separate mode without any boost capability like the PS5 now has. I lost my FF12 saves due to a corrupted virtual memory card (I pressed the off button while it was still saving to virtual memory card I guess)
Btw thanks to the PS4 Pro, a lot of PS4 games make more use of PS5' extra power.

My PS3 controllers did break within 2 years. My 2 launch model PS3s did as well after 3 years.

But it did have the cheapest and best blu-ray player for a long time. Early dedicated blu-ray players at the time of PS3 release were slow, cost $2,000 and became obsolete because they couldn't get patched. PS3 did add 3D blu-ray support later through some magic.

PS3 was great, but expensive and had plenty issues. Modern consoles may suck, but try installing a game on PS3 again that had many patches. It takes days to get GT5 fully working again on a PS3 from original disc install... Patching, installing, OS in general, PS3 feels horribly slow nowadays. It's still a great blu-ray player though :)

Let's not glorify gen 7. I had 2x YloD, went through 7 ps3 controllers, 2x RRoD, 360 charge packs failed after 3 years, HDD failure in PS3 (months to redownload my digital games as I was still on a 60GB monthly limit connection), Disc drive failure in the Wii, Charge packs for Wii remotes all failed, Balance board connection failure. Gen 7 has been the worst for durability.

Are you refering to the 2011 PSN outage or something else? That outage lasted 23 days. As for it being crap, you could play 64 man Resistance matches. Xbox had nothing like that.

PS3 was rife with online passes? Can you provide ten examples games that had online passes on PS3? I bet online passes represent less than 10% of online PS3 games. But it's your claim, so I'll let you defend it.

I did not know PAL models didn't have BC. I looked into this and it looks like at best they had some crappy emulation solution with firmware 1.70 or something. I don't count that as legit BC. BC means the game runs 95% similar to the original hardware. As a sidenote, I don't consider a lot of PC games to be BC games. Why? Because they depend on heavy emulation to even run games from ancient versions of windows.

Your PS3 controllers and launch model are examples of anecdotal evidence. PS3's were reliable overall and so were the controllers. You personally having bad luck does not change that.

You probably lack an SSD and need to reapply thermal paste to your PS3. That's why GT5 takes so long. At least from disc. If you are trying to install patches from online then just be thankful Sony hasn't pulled the plug on that. Online support was probably faster back in the day.


Your final paragraph is nothing but anecdotes.

https://www.reddit.com/r/PS3/comments/2oouzv/online_pass_list_wiki/
Yeah definitely less than 10% of all games, but no idea how many online multiplayer games there were without these passes.

Was the down time only 23 days? It felt longer! It also broke my daily GT5 lobby racing, that never recovered.

Of course I lack an SSD in my PS3, they didn't exist yet back then...

But it's not just the HDD speed. PS3 does sequential patching, download patch, copy whole game, apply patch, repeat. The more patches, the longer it's going to take and GT5 and GT6 had tons of patches. Online support wasn't faster either, however internet was slow in general.

The PS3 was not reliable, "The various fat models had failure rates ranging from 5-20%. The slims have a failure rate of around/under 1%". Sure the slim still works, so does my PS2 and GameCube. I never had as much stuff break on me as during gen 7.


I still love many things about the PS3. Still use it as a media player, have lots of music videos stored on it from PS3 You Tube (downloaded so all still commercial free!) And the little previews are great, the cross bar OS is still my favorite. And it plays CDs which PS5 can't anymore.
Blu-ray plays great on it, with 7.1 linear PCM 24 bit 192khz audio output.

Yet I wouldn't go back to it for gaming.



SvennoJ said:

Of course I lack an SSD in my PS3, they didn't exist yet back then...

But it's not just the HDD speed. PS3 does sequential patching, download patch, copy whole game, apply patch, repeat. The more patches, the longer it's going to take and GT5 and GT6 had tons of patches. Online support wasn't faster either, however internet was slow in general.

Of course there is some new tech in every new generation, everything in the world that people uses is trying to get better overtime, and even with somethings being worse, there is still some improvements here and there. By your logic we had to not go back to the PS1 or PS2 because they didn't have HDD but memory cards, or they played on CRT tv and not on HD modern one. You can go by this logic for every generation. You can say the same SSD thing about the PS4 as well. So people don't have to go back because of this. The patches and installation on GT5 and GT6 specifically were big and long yes, but that is from the exception games, that are rare cases. Nowadays pretty much every game you have to wait for download and install around the same time or even more, so don't bash the PS3 gen about that. It was longer even in the PS4 gen. On PS3 and 360, 90% of the time you could play straight away cuz most of the games didn't require installation on 360 or PS3, and the other that require it was 10 minutes at most, way way less than the hours you wait now for downloading and installing.

SvennoJ said:

The PS3 was not reliable, "The various fat models had failure rates ranging from 5-20%. The slims have a failure rate of around/under 1%". Sure the slim still works, so does my PS2 and GameCube. I never had as much stuff break on me as during gen 7.

Let me fix that for you. The PS3s made till summer of 2008 weren't reliable. Everything after that was just as reliable. The same goes for the 360 as well.

SvennoJ said:

Yet I wouldn't go back to it for gaming.

I would, many others would, and many others and I included do, all over the time. You are welcome.



My sales comparison threads:

Ultimate Showdowns: JP 2023 / JP 2024 / 2024 / 2023 / 20222021

Lifetime Showdown / Historical Showdown / YOY Charts / 140M+ Club Chart / Quantity of Games

Kyuu said:

Kids will never know how amazing it felt to jump from a generation to the next.

And this sort of applies to technology in general. New automobile generations felt like the cars came from a different planet or something. Late 1970's to early 2000's will forever be my golden age.

Wow, didn't know you were from the 70s!



BraLoD said:
Kyuu said:

Kids will never know how amazing it felt to jump from a generation to the next.

And this sort of applies to technology in general. New automobile generations felt like the cars came from a different planet or something. Late 1970's to early 2000's will forever be my golden age.

Wow, didn't know you were from the 70s!

I was born in 1987, but some of the tech and stuff I and the people around me were into were from the late 70's. Late 70's and early 80's contextualized the advancement of technology.

Example: The first console I played was an Atari 2600 (late 70's). The first game systems I ever owned are Mattel Acquarius and an MSX computer (early 80's), my experience with all three happened at around the same time, so it made me appreciate how great the MSX was lol.