By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Movies & TV - Race swapping and whitewashing

curl-6 said:
Soundwave said:

Or one group of people just need to get used to the fact that they don't live in a monolithic world where everything revolves around them. 

Black/latino/Asian/native American/mixed people have navigated Hollywood being 95%+ white for decades and those audience demographics have also accepted that they don't get to see many people on screen that look like themselves for a long time, so now that they get a few roles here and there, why is it such a concern of yours that they need to be lectured and "put in their place"? Where you actively as concerned when the situation was reversed? Who is really being hurt by an Ariel being black when Disney has already made like 3 or 4 Little Mermaid movies with a white animated one? Why is that something that some people feel they must tear down? How many white actors get roles all the time based on just their looks and really not much else?

Of Ryan Gosling and Bradley Cooper and Matthew McCoungahey and Margot Robbie and Scarlett Johansen are they really actually the best actors in the world or are they getting their parts in large part because of how they look? This is a business where Ashton Kutcher gets nearly as many lead roles as Denzel Washington, Channing Tatum gets more chances than Sidney Poitier, Megan Fox was a bigger "star" at her peak than Angela Bassett ... is that based on acting ability? So I sorry I don't buy that "well PoC shouldn't want parts based on how they look", when white people have been getting parts on the basis of how they look for decades on end and that continues to this day. 

It's not even like when there is the odd, small numbered role that gets race swapped to a PoC that there aren't still plenty of roles for white actors. They still get the majority of roles do they not? 

It was different when white actors were stealing jobs like Prince of Persia or Emma Stone playing Asian roles because it's not like there were 50 other roles for a Persian/middle eastern or Asian actor to get instead. When that happened, it was effectively locking out entire ethnicities because those types of roles would be the only role they'd have a realistic shot at. Look at Mena Mousoud who played Aladdin in a movie that made a billion+ dollars at the box office, he can't get a role in other movies even despite being in such a blockbuster, now if that role of Aladdin was give to a white actor, which they probably would have done 15 years ago, dude would even be locked out of that. 

If a white actor like Emma Stone misses out on a Little Mermaid role or something, they have 50 other chances at other parts as they are heavily favored over a PoC actor in 80%+ of their auditions guaranteed. Like maybe the people who are getting a stick up their ass about this should chill the fuck out, there's still a white Star Lord, white Peter Parker, white Ethan Hunt, white Thor, plenty of white actors like Jon Cena and Jason Satham have been added to the Fast series to make up for Paul Walker's absence, no less than 3 (4?) concurrent white Batmans (lol), there's been 11 Star Wars movies and the lead in all 11 of them is white, etc. etc.  there are still the vast majority of movies that have a white lead. One doesn't need to act like a baby when other ethnicities get a chance at a big role 1/10 times (and that's being generous) or lecture groups of people on why they shouldn't want to see themselves reflected in some of the media they consume. 

You're painting an incredibly inaccurate picture. This may have been the situation decades ago, but it's not even close to true today.

In the 2021-2022 TV season in the US, 50% of regular roles were people of colour: https://www.statista.com/statistics/949671/characters-broadcast-network-programs-ethnicity/ This is more than their share of the US population.
People of colour also had 40% of lead film roles in 2020 and 2021: https://www.statista.com/statistics/696850/lead-actors-films-ethnicity/

I don't think your numbers are accurate.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/black-representation-in-film-and-tv-the-challenges-and-impact-of-increasing-diversity

 While their overall representation among film casts is broadly in line with the Black share of the US population (13.4 percent), Black actors play only 11 percent of leading film roles and are often funneled to race-related projects, which typically receive lower investment in both production and promotion.

Linear, old fashioned TV is OK for black actors, probably in part because black people watch more TV than any other demographic:

https://afro.com/blacks-watch-more-tv-than-any-other-group-nielsen-says/

But representation in modern platforms like streaming is still dismal, 5% of leads in streaming shows (Netflix, Disney+) are black. 

The representation for Latino (the fastest growing part of the US population), Asian (2nd fastest), and other ethnicities is still dismal:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2020/10/22/black-representation-tv-grows-but-diversity-off-screen-lags-study/3720579001/

Although the study shows shows that Black characters have become better represented on TV, it points out that other minority groups are far from proportionally represented onscreen and elsewhere. Latinos and Asian Americans remain significantly underrepresented in nearly all industry positions; there is minimal presence in any job category for people of Middle Eastern and North African descent; and there's virtually zero representation for Native Americans on TV.

So basically black people get some representation on network/cable TV because likely TV execs are desperate as its a dying format (whoopity doo). 

PoC having 40% of movie leads is just patently false. You can look at the top theatrical releases from 2022: Top Gun Maverick (white lead), Black Panther WF (black lead), Dr. Strange (white lead), Avatar 2 (well mostly blue people, but the lead live action is white), Jurassic World Dominion (white lead), Minions (animated), The Batman (white lead), Thor Love & Thunder (white lead), Spider-Man: NWH (white lead), Sonic 2 (white lead for live action), Black Adam (mixed ethnicity lead), Elvis (white lead), Uncharted (white lead), Nope (black lead), Lightyear (white lead character), Smile (white lead), The Lost City (white lead), Bullet Train (white lead), The Bad Guys (animated), Fantastic Beasts (white lead). 

So tallying that up you get 15/20 have white leads, 3/20 have black or mixed race leads, 2/20 are animated animals/non-humans. 0/20 are Latino, 0/20 are Asian, so basically talking CG animals or cartoons have a better shot at leading a movie than a Latino or Asian. 

I'd also ask what is the problem even if black people or any other ethnicity was over represented for a period of time on TV or film? You know perfectly well white people have been over represented in those areas and continue to be (see the movie breakdown above), why is it only a problem if it's blacks that have over representation once in a while? Ask yourself why there is this double standard, because you don't seem to complain when its white people being over represented. 

Last edited by Soundwave - on 18 July 2023

Around the Network
Soundwave said:
curl-6 said:

You're painting an incredibly inaccurate picture. This may have been the situation decades ago, but it's not even close to true today.

In the 2021-2022 TV season in the US, 50% of regular roles were people of colour: https://www.statista.com/statistics/949671/characters-broadcast-network-programs-ethnicity/ This is more than their share of the US population.
People of colour also had 40% of lead film roles in 2020 and 2021: https://www.statista.com/statistics/696850/lead-actors-films-ethnicity/

I don't think your numbers are accurate.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/black-representation-in-film-and-tv-the-challenges-and-impact-of-increasing-diversity

 While their overall representation among film casts is broadly in line with the Black share of the US population (13.4 percent), Black actors play only 11 percent of leading film roles and are often funneled to race-related projects, which typically receive lower investment in both production and promotion.

Linear, old fashioned TV is OK for black actors, probably in part because black people watch more TV than any other demographic:

https://afro.com/blacks-watch-more-tv-than-any-other-group-nielsen-says/

But representation in modern platforms like streaming is still dismal, 5% of leads in streaming shows (Netflix, Disney+) are black. 

The representation for Latino (the fastest growing part of the US population), Asian (2nd fastest), and other ethnicities is still dismal:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2020/10/22/black-representation-tv-grows-but-diversity-off-screen-lags-study/3720579001/

Although the study shows shows that Black characters have become better represented on TV, it points out that other minority groups are far from proportionally represented onscreen and elsewhere. Latinos and Asian Americans remain significantly underrepresented in nearly all industry positions; there is minimal presence in any job category for people of Middle Eastern and North African descent; and there's virtually zero representation for Native Americans on TV.

So basically black people get some representation on network/cable TV because likely TV execs are desperate as its a dying format (whoopity doo). 

PoC having 40% of movie leads is just patently false. You can look at the top theatrical releases from 2022: Top Gun Maverick (white lead), Black Panther WF (black lead), Dr. Strange (white lead), Avatar 2 (well mostly blue people, but the lead live action is white), Jurassic World Dominion (white lead), Minions (animated), The Batman (white lead), Thor Love & Thunder (white lead), Spider-Man: NWH (white lead), Sonic 2 (white lead for live action), Black Adam (mixed ethnicity lead), Elvis (white lead), Uncharted (white lead), Nope (black lead), Lightyear (white lead character), Smile (white lead), The Lost City (white lead), Bullet Train (white lead), The Bad Guys (animated), Fantastic Beasts (white lead). 

So tallying that up you get 15/20 have white leads, 3/20 have black or mixed race leads, 2/20 are animated animals/non-humans. 0/20 are Latino, 0/20 are Asian, so basically talking CG animals or cartoons have a better shot at leading a movie than a Latino or Asian. 

I'd also ask what is the problem even if black people or any other ethnicity was over represented for a period of time on TV or film? You know perfectly well white people have been over represented in those areas and continue to be (see the movie breakdown above), why is it only a problem if it's blacks that have over representation once in a while? Ask yourself why there is this double standard, because you don't seem to complain when its white people being over represented. 

I think the discrepency lies in that the McKinsey article uses data from 2015-2019, while representaton stepped up a lot in the last few years.

Your other link also draws on data back to 2017, so it's a few years before the curve.

As far as movies go, I'd take an actual study over anybody's forum list.

I don't think any reasonable person would say that people of colour don't deserve strong representation, I certainly don't think anyone here is arguing that, I think the sentiment is more that race swapping established characters isn't a good solution.

I mean, why not create original characters instead for example. Surely that way would be better for everyone. The goal should be equitable representation for all, not tit for tat.

Last edited by curl-6 - on 19 July 2023

curl-6 said:
Soundwave said:

I don't think your numbers are accurate.

https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/diversity-and-inclusion/black-representation-in-film-and-tv-the-challenges-and-impact-of-increasing-diversity

 While their overall representation among film casts is broadly in line with the Black share of the US population (13.4 percent), Black actors play only 11 percent of leading film roles and are often funneled to race-related projects, which typically receive lower investment in both production and promotion.

Linear, old fashioned TV is OK for black actors, probably in part because black people watch more TV than any other demographic:

https://afro.com/blacks-watch-more-tv-than-any-other-group-nielsen-says/

But representation in modern platforms like streaming is still dismal, 5% of leads in streaming shows (Netflix, Disney+) are black. 

The representation for Latino (the fastest growing part of the US population), Asian (2nd fastest), and other ethnicities is still dismal:

https://www.usatoday.com/story/entertainment/tv/2020/10/22/black-representation-tv-grows-but-diversity-off-screen-lags-study/3720579001/

Although the study shows shows that Black characters have become better represented on TV, it points out that other minority groups are far from proportionally represented onscreen and elsewhere. Latinos and Asian Americans remain significantly underrepresented in nearly all industry positions; there is minimal presence in any job category for people of Middle Eastern and North African descent; and there's virtually zero representation for Native Americans on TV.

So basically black people get some representation on network/cable TV because likely TV execs are desperate as its a dying format (whoopity doo). 

PoC having 40% of movie leads is just patently false. You can look at the top theatrical releases from 2022: Top Gun Maverick (white lead), Black Panther WF (black lead), Dr. Strange (white lead), Avatar 2 (well mostly blue people, but the lead live action is white), Jurassic World Dominion (white lead), Minions (animated), The Batman (white lead), Thor Love & Thunder (white lead), Spider-Man: NWH (white lead), Sonic 2 (white lead for live action), Black Adam (mixed ethnicity lead), Elvis (white lead), Uncharted (white lead), Nope (black lead), Lightyear (white lead character), Smile (white lead), The Lost City (white lead), Bullet Train (white lead), The Bad Guys (animated), Fantastic Beasts (white lead). 

So tallying that up you get 15/20 have white leads, 3/20 have black or mixed race leads, 2/20 are animated animals/non-humans. 0/20 are Latino, 0/20 are Asian, so basically talking CG animals or cartoons have a better shot at leading a movie than a Latino or Asian. 

I'd also ask what is the problem even if black people or any other ethnicity was over represented for a period of time on TV or film? You know perfectly well white people have been over represented in those areas and continue to be (see the movie breakdown above), why is it only a problem if it's blacks that have over representation once in a while? Ask yourself why there is this double standard, because you don't seem to complain when its white people being over represented. 

I think the discrepency lies in that the McKinsey article uses data from 2015-2019, while representaton stepped up a lot in the last few years.

Your other link also draws on data back to 2017, so it's a few years before the curve.

As far as movies go, I'd take an actual study over anybody's forum list.

I don't think any reasonable person would say that people of colour don't deserve strong representation, I certainly don't think anyone here is arguing that, I think the sentiment is more that race swapping established characters isn't a good solution.

I mean, why not create original characters instead for example. Surely that way would be better for everyone. The goal should be equitable representation for all, not tit for tat.

Representation has only stepped up in the last several years because of pressure and work by PoC groups and it's mainly a rise in linear television, which isn't the giant ass prize that I think you believe it is ... getting in on linear old fashioned TV at this point is like having the no.1 game on the Wii U in 2016. It's a dying format. It's not even like 2015-19 is some ancient time period too, lol, that's just a few years ago. 

You can easily look at the top 20-30 movies of every year for the last 20 years, you don't need a study for that, tell me when you find multiple years with PoC headlining 30% of those films. This is not even opening the can of worms that Latino and Asian groups are still under-represented across the board in everything. 

There aren't that many race-swapped characters to begin with (as in PoC taking jobs from white actors when white actors get are overwhelmingly represented and have a broad range of roles they can audition for). Ariel being black one time isn't the end of the world. If you're going to talk about "tit for tat", then as far as I'm concerned should that not apply to white people not crying or making a giant ass stink every time any other group gets a little more representation here and there? 

Can there be some freaking maturity there in understanding that they have been over-represented in media and still are especially in terms of leading roles in big ticket film/TV projects? Instead the reaction is more akin to a spoiled 5 year old throwing a fit at their birthday that other kids are getting to eat some of their birthday cake and the entire cake is not for them, even though they are still getting the biggest piece? Can we acknowledge that too? 

Last edited by Soundwave - on 19 July 2023

I beleive most people are just tired of politics being forced into media where it doesn't belong. There is a scene in Crowded Room that completely didn't fit the story line, was clearly political grooming and even suggested white males with mental disorders deserve to be mistreated by the justice system.

I think people simply want politics to stay in the political arena so they can enjoy their hobbies without being groomed.

I recall reading Hogwarts Legacy review on Polygon, except it was a thesis on JK and didn't really talk about the game.  Girlfriend reviews was literally attacked and briefly taken down in Discord because they dared to consider reviewing Hogwarts Legacy.  This behavior is a problem and should concern people.  

People are tired of politics in their face all day long.

Last edited by Chrkeller - on 20 July 2023

i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED

Chrkeller said:

I beleive most people are just tired of politics being forced into media where it doesn't belong. There is a scene in Crowded Room that completely didn't fit the story line, was clearly political grooming and even suggested white males with mental disorders deserve to be mistreated by the justice system.

I think people simply want politics to stay in the political arena so they can enjoy their hobbies without being groomed.

I recall reading Hogwarts Legacy review on Polygon, except it was a thesis on JK and didn't really talk about the game.  Girlfriend reviews was literally attacked and briefly taken down in Discord because they dared to consider reviewing Hogwarts Legacy.  This behavior is a problem and should concern people.  

People are tired of politics in their face all day long.

The vast majority of people don’t give a shit. TV has always been political. But there’s a really loud minority of outraged whiny white men who want to stand on a “soapbox” and shriek—so they’re all on Twitter. They shriek about the race and gender of actors in a film, shriek about what they don’t like on TV or streaming, and all because they can’t get laid. They’re the Karens/Kyle’s Mom of the Internet, and they want to talk to a show runner or executive producer on Twitter right now!




I describe myself as a little dose of toxic masculinity.

Around the Network

What about dwarfs?

https://metro.co.uk/2023/07/15/snow-white-remake-first-look-images-show-diverse-casting-19135409/



Soundwave said:
curl-6 said:

I think the discrepency lies in that the McKinsey article uses data from 2015-2019, while representaton stepped up a lot in the last few years.

Your other link also draws on data back to 2017, so it's a few years before the curve.

As far as movies go, I'd take an actual study over anybody's forum list.

I don't think any reasonable person would say that people of colour don't deserve strong representation, I certainly don't think anyone here is arguing that, I think the sentiment is more that race swapping established characters isn't a good solution.

I mean, why not create original characters instead for example. Surely that way would be better for everyone. The goal should be equitable representation for all, not tit for tat.

Representation has only stepped up in the last several years because of pressure and work by PoC groups and it's mainly a rise in linear television, which isn't the giant ass prize that I think you believe it is ... getting in on linear old fashioned TV at this point is like having the no.1 game on the Wii U in 2016. It's a dying format. It's not even like 2015-19 is some ancient time period too, lol, that's just a few years ago. 

You can easily look at the top 20-30 movies of every year for the last 20 years, you don't need a study for that, tell me when you find multiple years with PoC headlining 30% of those films. This is not even opening the can of worms that Latino and Asian groups are still under-represented across the board in everything. 

There aren't that many race-swapped characters to begin with (as in PoC taking jobs from white actors when white actors get are overwhelmingly represented and have a broad range of roles they can audition for). Ariel being black one time isn't the end of the world. If you're going to talk about "tit for tat", then as far as I'm concerned should that not apply to white people not crying or making a giant ass stink every time any other group gets a little more representation here and there? 

Can there be some freaking maturity there in understanding that they have been over-represented in media and still are especially in terms of leading roles in big ticket film/TV projects? Instead the reaction is more akin to a spoiled 5 year old throwing a fit at their birthday that other kids are getting to eat some of their birthday cake and the entire cake is not for them, even though they are still getting the biggest piece? Can we acknowledge that too? 

No offense but the one "throwing a fit" here is you. Your posts are full of unnecessary hostility.

Nobody here is attacking people of colour, yet you're constantly bashing white people and saying those who disagree with you are spoiled children.

Is it too much to ask that we discuss the issue with, in your words "some freaking maturity"?

Last edited by curl-6 - on 21 July 2023

Chrkeller said:

I beleive most people are just tired of politics being forced into media where it doesn't belong. There is a scene in Crowded Room that completely didn't fit the story line, was clearly political grooming and even suggested white males with mental disorders deserve to be mistreated by the justice system.

I think people simply want politics to stay in the political arena so they can enjoy their hobbies without being groomed.

I recall reading Hogwarts Legacy review on Polygon, except it was a thesis on JK and didn't really talk about the game.  Girlfriend reviews was literally attacked and briefly taken down in Discord because they dared to consider reviewing Hogwarts Legacy.  This behavior is a problem and should concern people.  

People are tired of politics in their face all day long.

I have to disagree *hard* on this. People aren't tired of politics in their media and I would argue some of the best art and media is political. But before going into that, I want to point out what people are actually tired of. I think there are two things.

The first is basically, that a piece of art needs first to entertain, before it can educate. People need to want to watch, read or otherwise experience the art, then they also can digest the underlying messages and they can inform their behaviour. Modern movies often tend to forget that entertainment part, or the education part is propped on without connection and feels misplaced.

Secondly I think most people are upset, because these discussion are often presented in black and white. This thing is bad, everyone supporting it is a bad person. This thing is good, everyone *not* supporting it must be backwards. Reality often isn't black and white, there are many shades of grey. Real people in the real world often acknowledge that. A lot of modern cinema doesn't. That is something which tends to piss people off.

But political messages in art can work, and do this even these days. Pretty much everyone I know and online really loves Arcane. Even though it is very much political and "woke" on many levels. Having strong female characters, gay characters, characters with differing ethnicities and belief systems, strong injustices, social and power inequalities. But all this works, because it is organically threaded into a compelling and interesting story.

Joker is another example. For some reason it is seen as anti-"woke", but I would disagree. The movie shows the injustice of the health system, the systemic discrimination of people with mental illnesses, the discrimination of poor people, the indifference or even open hate from rich people towards these problems. That all are very much political and "woke" agendas. Yet the movie presents them in a compelling way.

The korean movie Parasite is also showing strong social inequality and the society that produces. Very woke. And got great reviews because it is a great movie. Even though these topics are very much political.

So yeah, I disagree. People don't hate politics in their media. They jsut hate bad media with propped on and clumsy representation of political issues. We dislike bad art. Simple as that.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

Mnementh said:
Chrkeller said:

I beleive most people are just tired of politics being forced into media where it doesn't belong. There is a scene in Crowded Room that completely didn't fit the story line, was clearly political grooming and even suggested white males with mental disorders deserve to be mistreated by the justice system.

I think people simply want politics to stay in the political arena so they can enjoy their hobbies without being groomed.

I recall reading Hogwarts Legacy review on Polygon, except it was a thesis on JK and didn't really talk about the game.  Girlfriend reviews was literally attacked and briefly taken down in Discord because they dared to consider reviewing Hogwarts Legacy.  This behavior is a problem and should concern people.  

People are tired of politics in their face all day long.

I have to disagree *hard* on this. People aren't tired of politics in their media and I would argue some of the best art and media is political. But before going into that, I want to point out what people are actually tired of. I think there are two things.

The first is basically, that a piece of art needs first to entertain, before it can educate. People need to want to watch, read or otherwise experience the art, then they also can digest the underlying messages and they can inform their behaviour. Modern movies often tend to forget that entertainment part, or the education part is propped on without connection and feels misplaced.

Secondly I think most people are upset, because these discussion are often presented in black and white. This thing is bad, everyone supporting it is a bad person. This thing is good, everyone *not* supporting it must be backwards. Reality often isn't black and white, there are many shades of grey. Real people in the real world often acknowledge that. A lot of modern cinema doesn't. That is something which tends to piss people off.

But political messages in art can work, and do this even these days. Pretty much everyone I know and online really loves Arcane. Even though it is very much political and "woke" on many levels. Having strong female characters, gay characters, characters with differing ethnicities and belief systems, strong injustices, social and power inequalities. But all this works, because it is organically threaded into a compelling and interesting story.

Joker is another example. For some reason it is seen as anti-"woke", but I would disagree. The movie shows the injustice of the health system, the systemic discrimination of people with mental illnesses, the discrimination of poor people, the indifference or even open hate from rich people towards these problems. That all are very much political and "woke" agendas. Yet the movie presents them in a compelling way.

The korean movie Parasite is also showing strong social inequality and the society that produces. Very woke. And got great reviews because it is a great movie. Even though these topics are very much political.

So yeah, I disagree. People don't hate politics in their media. They jsut hate bad media with propped on and clumsy representation of political issues. We dislike bad art. Simple as that.

We are saying the same thing.  What you posted is exactly what I mean when I said people are tired of politics being "forced" into media where it doesn't belong.  Some stories inherently have political elements and it fits.  The problem is when a story inherently isn't political and is forced because reasons.



i7-13700k

Vengeance 32 gb

RTX 4090 Ventus 3x E OC

Switch OLED

All roles should just be played by Eddie Murphy