Chrkeller said: 5) graphics are just bad. . |
Humm, what ?
Which did you prefer? | |||
HFW | 14 | 35.90% | |
ER | 19 | 48.72% | |
Neither | 3 | 7.69% | |
Both equally for different reasons | 3 | 7.69% | |
Total: | 39 |
Chrkeller said: 5) graphics are just bad. . |
Humm, what ?
Granted I haven't completed HFW yet, I think Elden Ring is (by far) the better game.
The main thing is the gameplay and ER delivers that in spades. HFW is I found was just okay. It didn't really push the boat out and it felt like I was playing Zero Dawn just with prettier graphics and a few extra things added in. Only.. the luster has gone a bit, since the origin story has already been told.
I don't usually care for much for story in action RPG's but also found the MC insufferable in Horizon and the story uninteresting. Not to mention there being too much dialogue and cut scenes (which I didn't care for). ER has much of its lore from expositions but I found it much more interesting and characters and even NPC's through side missions and the little cut-scenes it has.
There's also stuff in the game that's simply time wasting in HFW... like gathering for item pickups; which is integral to the mechanics but you have to keep watching the same damn animation every.damn.time. Maybe its not my kinda game lol.
Last edited by hinch - on 08 May 2022IcaroRibeiro said:
Humm, what ? |
Horizon is way more impressive (graphically) than Elden. It isn't close, IMHO. I have the ps5 versions.
hinch said: Granted I haven't completed HFW yet, I think Elden Ring is (by far) the better game. There's also stuff in the game that's simply time wasting in HFW... like gathering for item pickups; which is integral to the mechanics but you have to keep watching the same damn animation every.damn.time. Maybe its not my kinda game lol. |
You can turn that animation off, just heads up.
Chrkeller said:
Horizon is way more impressive (graphically) than Elden. It isn't close, IMHO. I have the ps5 versions. |
I get Horizon graphics are better. But that's not how you have worded. "Horizon graphics are superior" vs "Elden Ring graphics are bad" are not the same thing
Hiku said:
Could you tell me which non-optional main story bosses in Elden Ring you're referring to, and how you feel they were similar? Spoiler! Rhadan (Or two Demi gods of your choice) Godfrey (Shade) Morgott Fire Giant GodskinDuo Maliketh Gideon Godfrey/Hoarah Loux Radagon Elden Beast
All the timings I had practiced against the original Tree Sentinel were now essentially completely different, but in spite of that I was able to adapt much quicker than the first time around, and beat him with relative ease.
This is an interesting statement to me, because this is something I think Elden Ring does better than any game I've played. This is because of 1.) The insane amount of items, gear, spells and skills they let you access right from the start. It's especially the magical abilities that have the most visually appealing animations to me, which is why I've primarily focused on those. And 120h in and I have barely scratched the surface of the things I want to do and try. Infinitely. Because that skill costs zero AP. And here's one spell vs a dragon.
So when you talk about weapons/skills and mention NiOh and Bloodborne, it's like we played different games. This is because unlike other From Soft games, if you encounter something that you're having trouble with, you can just go do something else to have fun, or fight any of the other 60+ bosses you have access to, because bosses in this game are rarely roadblocks until late/end game.
Again, very different experience. And I've spent a good amount of time farming EXP/runes. I'm level 160 for reference. And every time I level up my Vigor, my HP bar grows noticeably. It recently passed the first soft cap, which is 40. That's still a valuable increase, and that's after level 80+40 (120) So I'm not seeing diminishing returns on any stat except for INT and to a lesser degree HP. At 120 hours, and 160 levels in.
Many people have said this, and I agree: Elden Ring is as difficult or easy as you want it to be. Anyway, I can't speak to Horizon as I haven't played it. Though I do own the game as we got it for free from Sony a while ago. I didn't enjoy the other From Soft games much (though I haven't tried Sekiro, which I may like), while I do enjoy Souls-like games such as NiOh and Code Vein. While Elden Ring has been one of the best gaming experiences I've ever had, along with Chrono Trigger, Metal Gear Solid, Ocarina of Time, Resident Evil 4, Nier: Automata, etc. |
Hiku said:
Could you tell me which non-optional main story bosses in Elden Ring you're referring to, and how you feel they were similar? Spoiler! Rhadan (Or two Demi gods of your choice) Godfrey (Shade) Morgott Fire Giant GodskinDuo Maliketh Gideon Godfrey/Hoarah Loux Radagon Elden Beast
All the timings I had practiced against the original Tree Sentinel were now essentially completely different, but in spite of that I was able to adapt much quicker than the first time around, and beat him with relative ease.
This is an interesting statement to me, because this is something I think Elden Ring does better than any game I've played. This is because of 1.) The insane amount of items, gear, spells and skills they let you access right from the start. It's especially the magical abilities that have the most visually appealing animations to me, which is why I've primarily focused on those. And 120h in and I have barely scratched the surface of the things I want to do and try. Infinitely. Because that skill costs zero AP. And here's one spell vs a dragon.
So when you talk about weapons/skills and mention NiOh and Bloodborne, it's like we played different games. This is because unlike other From Soft games, if you encounter something that you're having trouble with, you can just go do something else to have fun, or fight any of the other 60+ bosses you have access to, because bosses in this game are rarely roadblocks until late/end game.
Again, very different experience. And I've spent a good amount of time farming EXP/runes. I'm level 160 for reference. And every time I level up my Vigor, my HP bar grows noticeably. It recently passed the first soft cap, which is 40. That's still a valuable increase, and that's after level 80+40 (120) So I'm not seeing diminishing returns on any stat except for INT and to a lesser degree HP. At 120 hours, and 160 levels in.
Many people have said this, and I agree: Elden Ring is as difficult or easy as you want it to be. Anyway, I can't speak to Horizon as I haven't played it. Though I do own the game as we got it for free from Sony a while ago. I didn't enjoy the other From Soft games much (though I haven't tried Sekiro, which I may like), while I do enjoy Souls-like games such as NiOh and Code Vein. While Elden Ring has been one of the best gaming experiences I've ever had, along with Chrono Trigger, Metal Gear Solid, Ocarina of Time, Resident Evil 4, Nier: Automata, etc. |
So sorry, I'm going to do a lazy reply.
By repeat bosses I don't mean the mean the main bosses for alt endings, I'm on about catacomb / tomb bosses and the evergould or whatever it's called.
In terms of spells, weapons etc, people tend to stick to the main ones. I had a sorcery build and pretty much everyone I know has played it went with a similar or same set up with weapons and spells. You can play through the game with the set up sand do the same thing.
Monster Hunter i think would be a better example where different enemies require different loadouts and set ups to get the best out of the fight.
I was level 160+ when I completed the game and other than health, barely any stat moved.
I know you're not taking a jab, a lot of the stuff is subjective.
I think even the story some what felt meh to me, as it's the same story being told about the land between life and death, fake / evil gods and breaking the cycle of life and death.
I did enjoy it which is why I bought it day one unlike HFW, I chose not to buy it until after I had finished ER, but it just happens I am enjoying HFW and the variety and quality of variety it offers far more.
IcaroRibeiro said:
I get Horizon graphics are better. But that's not how you have worded. "Horizon graphics are superior" vs "Elden Ring graphics are bad" are not the same thing |
For the ps5, I do find them bad. Pop-in, inconsistent fps, among other things. As a ps4 title perhaps it looks good, but it is easily the least impressive ps5 title I own.
*I have also had a few crashes along with spotty online connections.
"60fps remains unattainable on the actual PS5 game, which ranges from 45-60fps in its frame-rate mode, occasionally dropping still further in effects-heavy scenes." (Digital Foundry)
I find that really disappointing and noticeable during play. Horizon, via performance mode, is locked 60 fps... despite looking far better. Technically, Elden on the ps5, is very much below the bar.
Last edited by Chrkeller - on 09 May 2022Love HFW. I absolutely loved where they are taking the story and thought the game was an improvement in nearly every way over the first game which I also loved. Also the second game I've got a plat for with Spiderman being the first. With that said ER might be one of the best games I've ever played. I put in 99 hours and could have kept playing if I wanted to but wanted to save it for another day that I get the itch for the souls formula. Think I'll go PC next time though. Persona 5 I had 90 hours but I was ready for it to end.
Kinda offtopic but I've been thinking a lot about people's reactions to Elden Ring and what my reaction could be. I consider myself a Fromsoft fan, I bought Demon's Souls on the PS3 before Dark Souls launched and had an absolute blast with it. Actually it was my first PS3 game and it remains precious to me and also one of my top 5 favorites on that console. That being said I didn't love the games that came afterward: Dark Souls was good and the way the areas connected was better than Demon's but the story left A LOT to be desired. DS2 felt extremely derivative of Demon's and DS1. I didn't hate DS2 but it was just okay.
I have 0 interest in DS3 and some interest in Bloodborne but I do wonder if Elden Ring is as amazing as people say. From an outside perspective it just seems like open world Dark Souls.
Spike0503 said: Kinda offtopic but I've been thinking a lot about people's reactions to Elden Ring and what my reaction could be. I consider myself a Fromsoft fan, I bought Demon's Souls on the PS3 before Dark Souls launched and had an absolute blast with it. Actually it was my first PS3 game and it remains precious to me and also one of my top 5 favorites on that console. That being said I didn't love the games that came afterward: Dark Souls was good and the way the areas connected was better than Demon's but the story left A LOT to be desired. DS2 felt extremely derivative of Demon's and DS1. I didn't hate DS2 but it was just okay. |
It kinda is, and yet it makes a big difference.
For starters it makes the difficulty much more adjustable. A boss is too hard? Go somewhere else. The game actually encourages players to do exactly that, by putting two relatively hard bosses nearly at the start of the game: the Tree Sentinel and Margit. It teaches the players to look around what else they can find.
The amazing part though is exploration. And not only geographical, but also exploring gameplay mechanics. The world is well designed on multiple levels. On the macro level you have regions that are only partly visible (through clever usage of elevation) and may be hard to reach. But if you explore, each major region (except the endgame) has multiple ways to get there. So while many stepped into Liurnia after beating Godrick the Grafted, I already explored Liurnia before I even beat Margit. The same works for other regions as well. And on the medium or small level you still find the carefully crafted From Software dungeons.
And gameplay wise I don't think any From Game so far offered so many options. Yes, a lot of these were in past games, but Elden Ring has so many weapons, with Ash of Wars they can be combined with a lot of skills and their actual values and elemental damages can be changed. Craftable items also offer you ways into dealing with enemies. For instance the throwing pots can be crafted to include all sorts of elemental damage which allows even players with certain builds to access this if needed.
It also helps that most of the game is optional. That sounds like a bad thing, but actually it is a good thing. That is also part of the open world design, but many open world games still try to force you into a lot of it's content. But Elden Ring actually gives you the freedom to skip over most of the game. You still will try to experience a lot the game has to offer, because you *want* to. And if something in it is boring or frustratring - just leave it be and focus on the parts that are fun.
All that doesn't mean Elden Ring is the best game ever or it is perfect. It has flaws and shortcomings. A lot of it comes down to From being a small studio - obviously they cannot do as much as an AAA game like Horizon Forbidden West. But Elden Ring is a great experience. And the open world, the freedom and exploration aspect it offers brings just enough new stuff to make it interesting for From veterans, while the typical From Software elements bring a lot of freshness into the open world genre.