RolStoppable said:
You offer a better analogy, but then jump to something that I never said nor implied. My stance isn't anything like "this is the end of video games". Even in an environment with tougher market conditions than before, current 3DS sales are something to be concerned about. The DS peaked at above 400k units for non-holiday months, so calling 100k units bad does not mean that everything below the DS peak is terrible. 300k, or even just 200k, would not be considered terrible. But 100k... come on, that's not within the range where you can say that's neither good or bad. I don't think it will become clear how bad these 3DS sales truly are before the next generation is underway. Right now the conventional wisdom is that dedicated handhelds have nowhere to go but down in the future. But if the next Nintendo handheld shows an upwards trend, the 3DS will be exposed for the failure that it is. |
A 75% drop Gen to Gen sure is a matter for concern, and general gaming haven't dropped so far to consider this normal for a single platform.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."