How could Harris enact such policies, if she was Vice President? Did you actually read what I wrote? The Biden administration did something, but by far not enough. I showed the statistics, more and more people get poor and have problems, while the rich continually gets richer. If it is all the economy, why have only the working class to take the burden? That is something policy can do something about, that is what Bernie Sanders called out. Harris couldn't do anything yet about that, she wasn't president. She did indeed though find nothing worthy to change over the Biden administration.

Sure, but most is counted. And lets concede, yes maybe some former democrats now voted Trump. I assume more people came from non-voters, but that is just an assumption. The fact stays, that the majority of vote the democrats lost didn't go over to Trump.

Both campaigns had ads about pretty much everything. The Harris campaign had 1 billion dollar to burn. But what was the main messaging here? Working class? Nah. That barely made a dent. And given that under the democratic administration of Biden the working class had to suffer the economic downfall and not the rich, people got fed up to begin with. In that surrounding the messaging just wasn't convincing. There should have been more and bolder proposals.

The gaslighting is strong with you. I didn't pick up any right-wing propaganda. I cited Bernie Sanders, Mike Figueredo, Kyle Kulinski, Hasan Piker - actual left wingers. Not the center-right of the mass of the democratic party you are going so hard to bat for. You want to deny that any fault lies with the Democrats and that they lost big parts of the electorate because they don't care for them. You are telling people that live a harder live because of their circumstances that they should suck it up and they are being idiots and should vote dems - without expecting more than a bare minimum. You go on to state points what you make out as reasons declaring it as facts.

In denying people their reality you are actually the one helping the right, and you keep on doing so. If that is indicative of the democratic party, than probably the better course of action is not to try to reform the dems, but actually create a left-wing workers party. Because it is evident, that the current far-right Reps and center-right Dems are leaving behind more and more of the country. There is a lot of space left of them.

My initial reaction to reading your comment was that two moderators potentially misbehaved in their capacity as moderators.

After reviewing other posts to get further context (one of which you quoted) because this sounds like it could be a very serious issue, it seems this had nothing to do with Pi-Guy being a moderator.
And if you don't believe he spoke to a friend from the UK, simply say that you don't believe he did, unless you have evidence to support that he actually fabricated it.

"Someone mentioned a story I don't believe" ✔️
"A moderator fabricated a story" ❌

See the difference in the implications for those who don't know the context?
Please do the former from now on. Otherwise staff may have to spend time investigating a potential case of abuses of power for no good reason.

The second moderator you mentioned, that you claim threatened attacks on your wall, seems to be Ryuu.
In this case it seems there was a moderator action, when he redirected an off-topic discussion to your wall.
But I read through both comments he made on your wall, and I see no threatening attacks there.

You can respond to my post here if you wish to clarify something. In particular what you meant by "threatening attacks on my wall".
But if you have issues with any decision made, as per the forum rules you can discuss it with me or any other moderator in PM, instead of here.

Do the rest of us really need to see this "dirty laundry" in public?

i'm fine with it, lets show the narcissistic guy that his shit ain't gonna fly here.  Any false insinuations, gaslighting, any of that isn't something that i want around me.  He can go somewhere else and have the most wonderful magnificent life, far far away.  

Trump taps Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy to lead Department of Government Efficiency

President-elect Donald Trump has announced that billionaire Elon Musk and Vivek Ramaswamy, a former presidential candidate and ally of Trump, will lead a new Department of Government Efficiency.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/trump-taps-elon-musk-and-vivek-ramaswamy-to-lead-department-of-government-efficiency/ar-AA1tYH58?ocid=hpmsn&cvid=63e059bec81d44158f58e79192578e6a&ei=7

Put that in your pipe and smoke it!!

----------------------------------------------

Edit:

Welcome to the era of DOGE.

LMAO !!!

I will just say Chazore is right and everyone knows it.  

Now I have a mod messaging me telling me I have self esteem issues.

I'm sure that is fine and appropriate behavior too.  

1:45 - 3:25 (Political analyst tells snarky story about how she knew Kamala was going to win based on the polls pre election)

Doctors aren't always right. Police aren't always right. Media isn't always right. The Right isn't always right. And so on and so forth.

People need to realize that professionals aren't Gods, they're human beings. Individuals who don't know or understand everything, even when it comes to their specialized profession, and the few who actually do, for the most part, are an extreme rarity. Flawed on top of that, they all make mistakes, and more so than some would like to admit.

Professionals are more knowledgeable and useful in general, yes, but that's just it. In general. There's good reason why people will get second or third opinions from different doctors, and why some people will spend the time trying to educate themselves as much as possible beyond that, so that the best, most informed, intuitive decision can be made.

Everything should always be questioned. Everything. And then, you question that result/answer as well.

Chr, do you want some milk and cookies? Would that cheer you up? ;)

People don't tend to like (to see) weakness from leadership. If you're on the left and don't go along with everything, to them, you're showing weakness to the right and those independents who are undecided as to where they stand. In politics the opposition is likely to use that against you and you may lose support and voters because of it, to the point where you may lose power or be unable to attain it.

The left look to the Gov these days much more so than the right, and so being united is much more important to them. The right is much more comfortable on their own, and doesn't see the need to rely on the Gov like the left does. It's also why the right cares so much more about the individual States, as well as the first and second amendments these days.

Political aggression in general, in a democracy or similar, also tends to mean one side can't make its case to the opposition, so you start with aggression before you move on to force, to try and get your way. The left these days likes to say it's because some people, especially on the right, are so stupid, but that doesn't really make any sense, because that would mean the left was smarter, if not much smarter, and if they were that smart, it should be easy to dumb it down and explain it to most of the 'idiots'.

Some people just don't understand for different reasons, but there are some others who think they're much smarter than they actually are, as well some others who aren't near as dumb and useless as they're told they are. There's way too many people in bubbles that think they're open minded, when they're actually more so in "The Matrix" and don't realize it, or far worse, realize it, like it, and think it's what's best for everyone.

1. You are asking very stupid questions here. Harris was the presidential candidate and talked about the policies she will introduce once she is president. She told people that inflation has come down, but that isn't enough yet. She has said that over and over again during her campaign. You are clinging to her one isolated statement she made on The View and take that as her consistent message during her campaign, but that statement was an answer to the question what she would have done differently if she were president during the Biden term. It wasn't a question about what she will do during her term.

2. Yes, working class was the main message. How many American broadcasts did you watch as a German who isn't interested in sports? Most likely a grand zero. You hardly posted in this thread before the election either, so you are pretty much stumbling in here blindly and running with the limited information you like the most. That's why sundin is saying that you must live in an alternate reality, and he is right in saying that. Which leads to your conclusion...

3. ...that is inevitably off base because your premise what the Harris campaign was about is so wrong already. It's also rich that you accuse me of denial after deliberately snipping my post to leave out the part where I placed blame on the Democrats.

https://kamalaharris.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/Policy_Book_Economic-Opportunity.pdf

Just read the bullet points on page 3, that's what Harris ran on.