A +20year old game that was revamped 9years ago that can be bought for $5-10 but was able to sell it for $40. Yea of course it was a 'smash hit'.

Other 3rd party devs are kicking themselves for not following this.

Yeah. They will use this info how they want. Does this mean that Switch owners want more capcom games or maybe the Switch audience is highly lucrative and full of game hungry owners??  Does this mean they should take it seriously and release better Monster Hunter titles, resident evil and more?  No it means to them just what you said. Had Street Fighter not sold well they would have just said that the Switch owners don't want capcom games or only buy Nintendo. It's always someone else's fault. I hate these huge ego games companies, and Capcom has always been bad at business decisions.

For all the potential faults of Ultra Street Fighter as a opening for overpriced games, I do appreciate a good reaction to third party on the Switch.

This can only be good, even if Ultra Mega Man X ends up a thing

Seemingly it sold well although being crap. So Capcom has no excuse left.

Dude, never react to vivster, he thinks he is funny.

Basically what I think. Now it's a matter to see if they'll read it as launch more AAA games ports or versions for Switch or just release cheap games to profit.

Me too!

It was a mistranslation if I remember correctly. USFII was never intended to be a gauge.

Yeah, we'll see. If they just translate their japanese MonHun-games they inevitably have to release for Switch, I'm fine though.

Well I'm not sure about the mistake made. But what I understood they wanted to test how the owners would respond to see if there was a good enough market for their products. But sure I can be wrong

I don't think Capcom is as dumb as some think. If there is more money to be made than it will cost then they may release on Switch. And so far the platform seem very viable.