If you look at the examples I gave, none of them were constructive feedback.

Seeing the ideas other users had shows that the highlighted claims aren't any better than Nintendo's mistakes. The joycons isn't why the Switch is weak, the snes mini doesn't mean nintendo is doomed, and a $199 Switch TV probably won't come for some time.

People seem to think that I'm holding myself to a higher standard or something. I'm not- that's not my intention. Even I have held ideas which were far from stellar. However, I admit that. I never act as though I'm always right.

Compare the idea of bringing an SNES collection to Virtual Console versus the stereotypical 'Nintendo is going third party' conspiracy theory. I believe it's perfectly fine to call out outrageous claims if they are being taken seriously.

I think they should release a switch without a screen. It would be cheaper to produce and everyone has a TV at home anyway.

Yes, consumers should really stop making suggestions that would not be beneficial to a company's financial baseline.

We should also let Nintendo dump their waste in the nearest river to not hamper their creative freedom.

That's a really good example.  Were consumers wrong to say that they had no interest in Kinect?  No, of course not.  They have every right to express their preference.

If there is anything that I have learned during my time in business, it's that the customer is not wrong about what they want.  Demand is the factor around which business usually revolves.  Microsoft, to their credit, realized this (after wrongly thinking they could dictate to consumers what they wanted).

If there is a market for a Switch TV then there is a market for a Switch TV.  There is no "wrong" in that.  Obviously, Nintendo doesn't have to explore that market but that doesn't mean consumers can't want what they want.  That the current Switch design is a hybrid means nothing at all.  

It's like saying it would be silly for a 3DS to not have 3D--a feature Nintendo themselves removed when they launched the 2DS.

Funny thing is, others demand a Switch-version without the dock and integrated Joycons.

Powerful console <> 3rd parties are coming

It's a common misconception the 3rd-parties are missing the Nintendo-boat because of power. If this was the case, they would've come to Gamecube.

Still no dice. The 3rd-parties go where the games sell they produce. Some usual multiplat-third-parties like COD sold atrocious on Nintendo. That's the customers Nintendo attracts. And the customers it doesn't attract, many such customers get a Playstation, whatever the power, the sticks or whatnot. On the other hand, japanese 3rd-parties sell well on Nintendo. Sonic sells well on Nintendo. Platformers sell better on Nintendo-platforms than others.

Reminds me of the fake post about how supposedly gamefreaks; directors would read out fan ideas for pokemon to the developers and laugh at them because of how bad they are

They didn't come to Gamecube because their games couldn't fit on a mini disc. 

I always love reading these over reaction threads. Like the opinions of the minority hardcore on gaming forums who think they know better then Nintendo are irrelevant in the grand scheme of things. If I was you, I'd not stress out over them.