By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - I don't get Microsoft's new Xbox tactic

I think that the X1 actually came out with its TV functionality at the wrong time (late). More and more people are ditching cable tv for streaming internet options.

I know that the X1 does Netflix and whatnot, but they definitely put effort into a declining feature.



Platinums: Red Dead Redemption, Killzone 2, LittleBigPlanet, Terminator Salvation, Uncharted 1, inFamous Second Son, Rocket League

Around the Network
fps_d0minat0r said:
cpg716 said:
fps_d0minat0r said:

Don't forget to add another 30 million for DirecTV and DISH..    

People love to say that Pay TV (Cable, Sat) is dead..     Its estimated that there are 115 million TV households in the USA.   Over 90 million of othem have Cable or Sat..    Average household has 2.5 people..  225 MILLION people watch Cable or Sat TV...   USA has 313 million people..   so 72% of ALL Americans have Cable or Sat TV...      the declines are nominal for real cord cutters.  It will be a good decade before the "death" of Cable or Sat is anything of REAL substance. 

The Xbox One's ability to still use the PREVAILING TV WATCHING method while also expanding into newer areas is a smart move..  anyone who thinks differently isn't paying attention to what the real data shows..    Cord cutters ..  are a minority.    


Yeah thats all good but theres only 2 problems.

1) Cable TV providers are not going to give MS a dime for allowing their TV to pass through XB1.

2) To the vast majority of people who watch proper TV, XB1 only offers a tiny convenience which no-one will care if they dont have, and its not a big influencing factor when people decide which console to buy.

You explained brilliantly how TV is still alive, but people can still watch it even if they buy another console.

 

Not with the intergration the X1 offers. I don't get how people don't understand that. The X1 makes GAMING easier, and more social then ANY other console EVER has. When you are watching TV ...  how do you know your friends logged on their PS4? You don't.. your console is shut off and even if it was ON, you can't tell anything going on it, because you have to swtich HDMI ports. 

Buy the X1 being INPUT 1 it will open a HOST of possibilities that the PS4 can NEVER have. This involves gaming and entertainment. This will ALWAYS allow for a greater intergration of GAMING and ENTERTAINMENT.  I think the realaztion of this technologically has ONLY just begun.  Microsoft can work directly with cable companies to at one point mostly elimate the cable box..   I think this is what you will see..     No different then what Fan TV, and possible the next Apple TV are also striving for.

I do think this will limit the X1 internationally, but could ultimately give them greater sales in North America and the UK. 


Yeah but when people are watching TV, who really wants all of that? It just kills the immersion on the programme you are watching.

If anyone REALLY wanted to, they could just use the playstation app to see whose online, what they are playing, watch them playing and send them a message... and it wouldnt be getting in the way of the show they are watching.

And im interested in the 'possibilities' you talk of. What exactly are they? do you think anyone will even care if the PS4 NEVER gets it? do you think it will make even the slightest of difference?

X1 will end up with greater sales in NA and UK anyway because thats their strongest markets. The sales in those regions are good not because of this TV thing, but because thats where the xbox brand is the strongest, thats where people got titanfall for free, thats where people got the biggest price cuts, thats where their games have the most appeal.


+1

Is social media integration that important that you must know who's online while watching TV?  People watch TV to watch TV.  You play games when you are in that mode.  I don't see how "so and so is online" popping up while you are watching tv makes for anything special regarding gaming and entertainment.  If anything, too much integration kills the immersion whether watching TV or gaming.  It's already annoying enough having "so and so is online" pop up while watching netflix.  I'd imagine a bunch of ADHD gamers are the only ones who like that stuff.  On another note though, besides the NFL app that I could see serving a purpose especially when it comes to fantasy league, everything else is just fluff trying to sell consumers integration that's not needed.



Man.. I hate it when your girl has to leave my place to come back to you..

JOKA_ said:
I think that the X1 actually came out with its TV functionality at the wrong time (late). More and more people are ditching cable tv for streaming internet options.

I know that the X1 does Netflix and whatnot, but they definitely put effort into a declining feature.

Not sure I get where you are going.  The X1 does both.  It does streaming from your PC and it does App streaming.  It allows you to connect your Cable to your cosole for one seamless streaming.  IF MS every get off their butts about the Miracast(Wi-Fi Direct) then you would be able to stream content from any device that support Miracast to your X1 without any additional hardware.  I am looking forward to this feature as I would be able to share my Windows 8.1 desktop through my X1.  This would be a better solution to introduce a much better media center type of environement.  I am thinking of creating a metro app that does exactly that.  It would automatically load when you Miracast your desktop or laptop to the X1.



Squeezol said:

So it's obvious that Microsoft doesn't just want games on the Xbox One and is already providing television features and wants to release new shows etc, but I just don't really get why they're doing this with the Xbox though. The Xbox isn't known at all for being a super diverse multimedia system and I don't think it will ever be properly seen as one. They could've just concentrated on games for the Xbox and not much else while working on a new system as a whole. I don't think their ideas are bad, it's just that I don't get why they're trying to merge this with the Xbox. If you're not interested in gaming you'll be paying too much for the hardware and if you are interested in gaming you might find this whole television thing useless and you'll buy a cheaper PS4. I just don't really get it..

Did you ignore the entire last generation? Xbox 360 led the way in bringing things like Netflix/HBO Go to consoles, and every person I know that has one uses it for watching shows in addition to gaming. To think that consumers are so singularly focused is to completely ignore the last 10 years. Even Wii's were used to watch Netflix, despite it being the worst platform to do it on. 

Consoles are now multimedia hubs, that's how they are viewed.



I can't be the only person that thinks that Sony/MS probably realize that people doing things other than gaming on their consoles isn't that profitable. Now that PS+/XBLG are de-facto required for online play, the only extra revenue they can get is by charging per use for non-gaming stuff (movie/music/tv show licensing for individual downloads, or a subscription based service).

Still, that's peanuts compared to someone buying even one major release a month. If people game less and derp around watching TV more, that's a net loss.



Around the Network
Arkaign said:
I can't be the only person that thinks that Sony/MS probably realize that people doing things other than gaming on their consoles isn't that profitable. Now that PS+/XBLG are de-facto required for online play, the only extra revenue they can get is by charging per use for non-gaming stuff (movie/music/tv show licensing for individual downloads, or a subscription based service).

Still, that's peanuts compared to someone buying even one major release a month. If people game less and derp around watching TV more, that's a net loss.

Actually MS and Sony want people who use their console for things other than gaming to use their service which are paid services.  They both want you to get hooked on using their console and being tied to their services which would mean they make money no matter if you are playing games or not.  MS and Sony have music, Movies and TV streaming from their own services.



PS+/xblg are cheap though. Unless you buy content from Sony/Ms (always the worst deal compared to Netflix/etc), someone watching videos and ESPECIALLY watching TV is reducing their profits vs someone buying new games for the console.

"What do you want to do? Buy the new Madden game?"

"Nah let's just watch TV"



cpg716 said:

When you are watching TV ...  how do you know your friends logged on their PS4? You don't.. your console is shut off and even if it was ON, you can't tell anything going on it, because you have to swtich HDMI ports.

To be fair, you can be logged in to your ps4 dashboard and it wont tell you if/when your friends log in or out.
However, if i wanted to know such info while watching tv, i would just look at the app on my phone.
Additionally, my TV and many other peoples tv's can, if we really wanted that info, do picture in picture, or side by side video.

cpg716 said:

Buy the X1 being INPUT 1 it will open a HOST of possibilities that the PS4 can NEVER have. This involves gaming and entertainment. This will ALWAYS allow for a greater intergration of GAMING and ENTERTAINMENT.  I think the realaztion of this technologically has ONLY just begun. 

$500 for more power consumption to watch tv when the only tangible bonus is overlay of notifications is an expensive feature, you can say "but it has a tv guide too", yeah.. and so does just about every tv, sat box, cable box, freeview box and freesat box the world over..

cpg716 said:

I think this is what you will see..     No different then what Fan TV, and possible the next Apple TV are also striving for.

I do think this will limit the X1 internationally, but could ultimately give them greater sales in North America and the UK. 

Until the xbox one has cable inputs (psst, it doesnt) then a cable box will always be needed, dont confuse hdmi passthrough for an actual signal tuner.



lucidium said:
cpg716 said:

When you are watching TV ...  how do you know your friends logged on their PS4? You don't.. your console is shut off and even if it was ON, you can't tell anything going on it, because you have to swtich HDMI ports.

To be fair, you can be logged in to your ps4 dashboard and it wont tell you if/when your friends log in or out.
However, if i wanted to know such info while watching tv, i would just look at the app on my phone.
Additionally, my TV and many other peoples tv's can, if we really wanted that info, do picture in picture, or side by side video.

cpg716 said:

Buy the X1 being INPUT 1 it will open a HOST of possibilities that the PS4 can NEVER have. This involves gaming and entertainment. This will ALWAYS allow for a greater intergration of GAMING and ENTERTAINMENT.  I think the realaztion of this technologically has ONLY just begun. 

$500 for more power consumption to watch tv when the only tangible bonus is overlay of notifications is an expensive feature, you can say "but it has a tv guide too", yeah.. and so does just about every tv, sat box, cable box, freeview box and freesat box the world over..

cpg716 said:

I think this is what you will see..     No different then what Fan TV, and possible the next Apple TV are also striving for.

I do think this will limit the X1 internationally, but could ultimately give them greater sales in North America and the UK. 

Until the xbox one has cable inputs (psst, it doesnt) then a cable box will always be needed, dont confuse hdmi passthrough for an actual signal tuner.

The X1 doesn't need a cable input because they are making deals with cable company to have their Apps.  The reason these same Apps are not on the Sony consoles is because Sony is in competition with the cable companies.  Today the 360 has Time Warner, Xfinity, Comcast, Version.  For people who use those services, they can cut the cable box completely.



Machiavellian said:

The X1 doesn't need a cable input because they are making deals with cable company to have their Apps.  The reason these same Apps are not on the Sony consoles is because Sony is in competition with the cable companies.  Today the 360 has Time Warner, Xfinity, Comcast, Version.  For people who use those services, they can cut the cable box completely.

Annnnd the entire point of having the hdmi passthrough becomes moot, why daisy chain all your hardware through the console when you can simply run them as apps?.

might have something to do with people not wanting to have to subscribe to a service to access a service theyre already subscribed to, just an idea.