Like I had already said the 3Ds was more powerful but I won't go around trying to 1-up it's graphics situation since it's really not that impressive. BTW alot of the 3DS games post launch was not able to achieve any sort of of notable boost in graphics without sacrificing something. Revelations had to downgrade draw distance in order to achieve detail and while it may look good it failed to excel in every part of the technical aspects.

@underlined. Do you have a source for that?

That still doesn't make me wrong that almost every developer will impliment it and BTW snake eater 3D was runing at a choopy 20fps compared to the more smoother 30fps of the PS2 version. It won't matter whether it was "mostly" or "mandatory" since every AAA developer has being using it so you can forget about trying to use the arguement against me. 

Yeah I do and most the game is mainly corridors so hows that for limiting draw distance.

@Edit: no because sony is limited duh. 

So, in the world of fatslob the words "mandatory" and "mostly" are interchangeable. So, what's the use discussing with you. So if I say all people have white skin color I'm right in your interpretation, because in my area the people mostly have white skin. By the way, PCs cannot play current games without major frame drops (as clearly mostly this is true for PCs), so you're clearly wrong if you say you have the better experience on PC.

How do you know that's not a design choice rather than a limitation? It was ported to the PSWii60U, are they also struggling with draw distance?

Correlation versus causation.

That's cause the game is mostly in dark rooms and thus it would be more representitive to use a darker room rather than a lit up room to show some consistency.

It's both. ;)

How do you know ;) Do you have a link to an interview that says so? Alternatively, how do you know they weren't able to find a workaround and didn't just use the path of least resistance?