In no was my comment made to bash the 3DS but rather it was to reveal what it was truly capable of and whether you like it not the fact is the 3DS is weaker than a gamecube and almost every game uses the 3D effect to diminish it's power and that leaves it very little space to improve on a graphics front. 

Once again if your trying to bait me I'm a PC gamer primarily so that won't work and it's there to warn you of assumptions about what someone prefers. Simple as what I said last time, then the PS3 has bad performance, period, no questions about whether it looks good or not, it just runs badly and that's how I see it. I'll ask you once again to ponder about what performance vs graphics means. 

Fine then go and believe your own grandeur of delusions, its not like I could care. Your issue of much better graphics than what the psp's best could achieve is also not without technical hurdles on the 3DS's best looking games. BTW madden and ridge racer already pushed the 3DS to it's limit at LAUNCH so too bad about it having any more power left. The reason why kaizer exhibits poor understanding has to do wth the fact that he belives the megaherts myth and while also psoting up incorrect info about the 3DS's GPU clock which was 133mhz and what more is that the gamecube has more shaders and a higher clock too.

Yeah I do and most the game is mainly corridors so hows that for limiting draw distance.

@Edit: no because sony is limited duh. 

I seem to remember Capcom admitting that RE:Revelations only used about 90% of the 3DS's hardware, and that between then and now Nintendo pushed a firmware update further upping things.

Regardless, we will probably not ever see a 3DS game which truly uses all the 3DS's potential. The Vita is the console with the reputation for power, so the games for it will have high production values, but the 3DS is a glorified toy. Developers will probably never try as hard with the 3DS because they don't have to. It will always be up for debate if the production values we see are the 3DS's actual limits or developers cutting corners because they can. My 3DS strikes me as about twice as much power as my PSP, but I doubt we'll see that much on it that the PSP couldn't match.

Actually, the 3DS uses its cache (of the CPU) to give you 2 different views of the game world, for stereoscopic 3D. So this doesn't diminish jack.

Let's see if I can surprise you.

Performance revolves more around frame-rate, screen tearing while Graphics revolves around textures, lighting, shadows, resolution, etc.

To close up my little inquisition on the PS3, since you say it has bad performance, would you say it is just a little better than a PSP and struggles to draw distances, because it drops frames?

Just so I understand where your dropped frames argument was leading us in the end.

Just so you know the PS3 and the 3DS are in different boats. The PS3 will destroy the PSP in terms of graphics even if it has bad performance and the problem with the 3DS is that it doesn't have enough power to out the PSP completely and once it does, it's not that big of a win since other things hinder it. Stereoscopic 3D is a resource hog and that is what will stop the 3DS from outdoing the PSP completely.

Just so you know the PS3 and the 3DS are in different boats. The PS3 will destroy the PSP in terms of graphics even if it has bad performance and the problem with the 3DS is that it doesn't have enough power to out the PSP completely and once it does, it's not that big of a win since other things hinder it. Stereoscopic 3D is a resource hog and that is what will stop the 3DS from outdoing the PSP completely.