I loled for 30 seconds straight

Holy...that is impressive :D !

@DSP info: Thanks for the answer

Didn't Pikmin 1 & 2 have 100 Pikmin at once as well, on the Gamecube?

I might have scared him away...

maybe forever ???? *crosses fingers*

Your right, the WiiU's eDRAM isn't slower than the 360's, but then again it may not be significantly faster either, the fact is Nintendo have not revealed any spec of the eDRAM nor has any developer leaked any info, but we can make an educated guess and say the eDRAM bandwidth may be in the same ball park as the 360's eDRAM. All you need to look at is the rest of the WiiU's components from the CPU/GPU to its main ram, none of it is top end hardware, rather the hardware is on the lower end. So based on this one can make the educated guess that the eDRAM would be balanced with the rest of the systems components, we can then conclude, although an educated guess,  that the WiiU's eDRAM has a possible bandwidth of about 40-50GB/s (maybe at the top most if we're pushing it 70GB/s), which is more than enough for a 350GF GPU. 

For reference, the PS4 has a bandwidth of 176GB/s with a GPU capable of doing 1.84TF, the Xbox one has a bandwidth of 170GB/s (comprising of eSRAM @ 102GB/s, DDR3 @ 68GB/s) with a GPU capable of 1.23TF, so the WiiU being a balanced Nintendo machine capable of about 350GF means it wouldn't require any more than what I've concluded with for eDram bandwidth. Keep in mind that just because eDRAM with a bandwidth of 1TB/s exists, doesn't mean the WiiU has it, just look at the Nvidia Titan a 4.5TF GPU, it has a bandwidth of 288GB/s, when you look at the bigger picture of products out there on the market, it becomes easier to see how a bandwidth of 40-50GB/s would be fairly reasonable given WiiU's GPU performance.

I of course can be wrong, and I eagerly await the day were Nintendo themselves, or at least a dev, leak this info, until then we have to take things with a grain of salt, be a little pessimistic and a realist when discussing said Nintendo hardware cuz jumping on the gravy train of 'WiiU eDRAM has a bandwidth 1TB/s cuz it exists’ doesn't move the discussion anywhere but into dreamland.

Oh, I missed your post :D, thanks for the answer !

The thing is you are assuming Nintendo fans think the games will look as good as PS4/xbox one. No one thinks that. They simple think the games can look better then the current efforts put out by the ports.

This is what I was going to type, nobody believes that the most advanced PS4 games will run on a WiiU, what we Nintendo fans want to make clear is that the U is still a good step up from the PS360 (think PSP vs. 3DS or Dreamcast vs GameCube/XBox) and will show us beautiful games despite it´s technical limitations.

Nintendo has ben obsessed with their memory subsystem since the N64 (which was bandwith starved), the GameCube´s memory was ahead of it´s time and there is literally no single negative comment about the WiiU´s memory syste , they knew what they were doing (inlcuding the huge caches on the CPU. which iirc are as big as the XBoner´s...?)

The very worst estimates I found for the edram were around 72 gb/s (taken from the infamous NeoGaf thread)...memory bandwith is the least of WiiU´s worries.

In an ideal world, Nintendo would make an offer this talented team could not refuse, and they would be under their wing developing SDKs for their hardware and 2~3 full AAA budget games per generation.

Yes, but I hope they can do more actions. Also you have the multiplayer modes with 2 times 100 Pikmin. But basically I see at the moment no game for WiiU that makes more usage of the CPU.