By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General - So.. Scantily Clad Women at the IGDA Party Made The Industry Freak Out.. Sexism Again?

Kasz216 said:
KungKras said:
Kasz216 said:
KungKras said:
Can't we just objectify both genders so I can enjoy looking at scantily clad women without worrying about being sexist?


Looking at scantly clad women doesn't make you sexist.   Paying scantly clad women to dance on a bar at a work function when said function includes many of your female employees makes you sexist.


But if there was both a scantily clad woman and a scantily clad man on stage?

At a buisness function?   Again your talking about something that's going to be more exclusionatory towards women then men on average, because their is more of a negative context there.

So yeah... that'd be somewhat sexist since it would be guranteed to turn off more of your women employees then your male employees, because again... context of history.

Both offended men and women would totally have a point to be offended though.  In a way it's being sexist to both groups.

 

Afterall, a racist guy who beleives every race has positive and negative steroetypes is still racist right?   I mean, if someone believes black people are good at sports, but dumb.  White people are natural leaders but have no rythem,  Asians are geniuses but have small penises, Hispanic people are family oriented but lazy and that Native Americans were savage but attuned to nature.

They'd still be REALLY fucking racist, and if they decided to put all of these steroetypes on Old Navy T-shirts... they'd still be really fucking racist.

(Other racists left out because i don't know there stereotypes)

That said the level of each offense can be measured by just how bad it's going to effect them.    I have no rythm... isn't going to be effecting white people on average the same as Savage would effect Native Americans.

 

As such, more effort should be put towards the things that hurt more people because... people only have limited energy.  Only makes seese to start "at the top" that is most damaging and move downwards once you take care of the worst ones.

I don't like involving the context of history since it's just a burden when trying to move forward. All I care about is what is technically equal, here and now.



I LOVE ICELAND!

Around the Network
allblue said:
thismeintiel said:
Yet another example of men thinking being a feminazi will get them laid in real life, as I'm sure that the majority who complained were men.

@ Kain

Yea, let's all stop doing things that are offensive to others. Then we can all stand in one spot and do nothing. Oh wait, that would be offensive to people without legs.

I wish I knew how to rep.

You mean report?

The button is next to the quote button, lol.



I LOVE ICELAND!

wfz said:
Kasz216 said:


1) Then you really aren't looking hard enough... espiecally with women.... it happens quite a bit.  Dead Island bloody torso ring a bell for example?  The point is, plenty of things bring this back... including... what you refrenced in the OP.    Hence the outrage.

 

2)  No, i pretty much can say that... because yeah it has happened.  Again did you ever once feel like property or brought back to when you were a slave.  Everything you went through could and HAS happened to black people and women... with the addition of being brought back to the negatives once inflicted on them... and also still inflicted on them often in society.

3)  Again... you were being compared to other white guys right?

 

4)  It's not an assumption.... I mean, you did start this thread afterall.

5)  No there isn't.  Not in the same way.  If you study sociology you'll notice a there is a specific ideal woman  This doesn't exist for men.

Once again, I suggest... look at the 100 top hottest guys.  Compare that to the 100 top sexiest girls.  You'll note the guys come in many more body types, and ethnicities.

Sure some guys here or there prefer different things.... they are a minority compaired to the majority of men who have been socially groomed to like one specific type of woman.

MEANWHILE, for men, there are multiple different archtypes that have fairly evenly split devotion and no one "ideal" form that the majority of a women find attractive.

 

Basically if you were to take 10 guys in a room and tell them to come to an agreement on the ideal woman... they would finish rather quickly, even if someone disagreed they'd still find that woman hot.   Ask the Woman the same thing and you probably aren't getting an answer remotely soon... Vin Diesal, Justin Timberlake, George Clooney.  There will be women who find one of those 3 extremely hot, and thing the other two are awful looking.  Doesn't really happen the same very often with men.



Also the stuff i'm talking about comes from the actual field of sociology.... the scientific study of society.  This is stuff coming from the sociological perspective.  In otherwords... i'm not the one in a bubble.  Well technically EVERYBODY is in the bubble of sociology and culture which effects us in tons of ways we don't know, but the important part here is... I know what's going on at least.

 

As an example

https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/

If you take that test as honestly as possible your likely going to be pretty surprised.  Though possibly not since i imagine you can guess where it's headed and might hestiatie a lot more because of it.

That dead island thing is debatable, but I'll give it to you. So there's an example of women being objectified. Now you're telling me redheads aren't objectified as "carrot tops" "gingers" etc. and made fun of? How the stereotypical redhead in cartoons is always ugly, skinny as hell, and has nerd glasses on? 

How about the fact that all of these "racist" and "sexist" ideas you're bringing up are all general and not targeted towards a specific person, meanwhile I have PERSONALLY been ridiculued and hated on for who I am physically my entire life? That hurts me a lot more than some stupid statue of a generic woman (ex. if it was a generic statue of a ginger). I don't care about that. I care about how I'm PERSONALLY treated. 

You're basically trying to tell me that because I'm white, I can't get offended and could never be as offended as someone else. So I'm inherently different? I thought we were all equal and could all be equally hurt. Do insults take me back to the time when I was a slave? Nope.. and I don't see any other black people who could say that. History doesn't matter as much as the present. And you know what? Redheads have always been made fun of. Oh shit, now I have a history to look back on where redheads have been ridiculued. Now am I allowed to have emotions and be hurt?

Just because I didn't find this one example to be sexist, doesn't mean I don't have respect for women and am sexist. You made a huge assumption there, buddy. 

Maybe the ideal man is less confined than the image of an ideal woman. I'll give you that point. But it still stands that many men love and appreciate many different forms of the female body, and vice versa. That's beside my main point, however, as I'm arguing that I can be just as hurt as a human being and just as emotionally impacted as anyone else.

And at work? I still get the ginger jokes and made fun of occasionally. Where the fuck is my equality? Oh, I'm white and male, I don't get equality. I get to sit down, shut up, and take all the hurt and insults because I apparently don't have the same emotions as women and blacks who can be discriminated against.

After all, you're claiming that's what your sociology tells you. 


No, that's not what i'm saying at all.  What i'm saying is.  People have had it worse then you... and you are downplaying what they went through.

There are Black people who went through everything you went through, except they went through it because they were black... and they didn't get jobs because they were black, and they were beaten, because they were black, and they were callled a slave because they were black and brought back to when they were slaves.

So yeah... it really ins't equatable, because you just don't have the same "bottom".  It's hard to hear, I know, but it's true.

 

And yeah... they do deserve more attention?  Why?  Because it happens to a LOT more people, there are a lot more black people, and women who go through the shit you did, then there are red heads, and it's a higher percentage of their population. 

These people were systematically discriminated against hundreds and hundreds of years.  The power differential just isn't remotely the same.

Not only that, this is something hardwired into people by people specifically in society.  So yeah, people get more upset... because there is a reason to get more upset.

It's like complaing that nobody is paying attention to one guys house gettng knocked down by a tornado but everyone is paying attention to a hurricane that devistated New Orelans.

It's not that nobody feels bad for the one guy.  It's just that the hurricane is a FAR more pressing concern.

 

 

You've got a probelm with people making jokes about being a ginger at work?  Go ahead and do something about it then.  I doubt many if anybody would particularly say you were being unreasonable. (at least not among people who find the above sexist)  Just that it isn't nearly as big of a concern as what happens to women or black people because the likelyhood it will offend and the level it will offend is of a much higher magnitude.

 

Edit: also seriously https://implicit.harvard.edu/implicit/ 

It will teach you something if you take it honestly.



Kasz216 said:

 

 


People have had it worse than me? Yes. They have. I never said no one has had it worse than me. You mentioned numerous times (before I got involved) that white men shouldn't be offended when called names, etc, and that only women and black people had rights to that. That's what ticks me off. Other people in this thread are saying that no one should be discriminated against and hated towards. I appreciate those people. You were saying it is only a one-way road.

I have been hurt just as much as many women and black people from the way others have treated me for what I am physically. Does that mean many of them haven't had it worse? No, of course many have. But I *have* been descriminated against and had my emotions hurt for years. I lived in fear and hatred towards myself for what I was because I was unaccepted. And you're saying I shouldn't be offended, because I'm white. You're saying I'm not allowed to be as upset as those other people. You're saying it doesn't matter.

But we're saying that all descrimination should stop. Because it doesn't matter who you are, you can get your feelings hurt and no one has the right to display hatred towards you for your birth.

But you're just like all the other people who just keep saying "grow up, it's not a big deal" when I get hurt. You have no idea the pain I went through and you have no basis to say those people descriminating against me shouldn't be stopped. 

THEY SHOULD BE STOPPED.

Descrimination should be stopped. Across the board. Not just for women. Not just for blacks. For Asians too. For redheads too. For muslims too. For everyone.

AND IT IS A BIG DEAL FOR ANYONE WHO GETS HARRASED FOR WHO THEY ARE, REGARDLESS OF THEIR SKIN COLOR OR CHROMOSOME MAKEUP.



wfz said:
Kasz216 said:

 

 


People have had it worse than me? Yes. They have. I never said no one has had it worse than me. You mentioned numerous times (before I got involved) that white men shouldn't be offended when called names, etc, and that only women and black people had rights to that. That's what ticks me off. Other people in this thread are saying that no one should be discriminated against and hated towards. I appreciate those people. You were saying it is only a one-way road.

I have been hurt just as much as many women and black people from the way others have treated me for what I am physically. Does that mean many of them haven't had it worse? No, of course many have. But I *have* been descriminated against and had my emotions hurt for years. I lived in fear and hatred towards myself for what I was because I was unaccepted. And you're saying I shouldn't be offended, because I'm white. You're saying I'm not allowed to be as upset as those other people. You're saying it doesn't matter.

But we're saying that all descrimination should stop. Because it doesn't matter who you are, you can get your feelings hurt and no one has the right to display hatred towards you for your birth.

But you're just like all the other people who just keep saying "grow up, it's not a big deal" when I get hurt. You have no idea the pain I went through and you have no basis to say those people descriminating against me shouldn't be stopped. 

THEY SHOULD BE STOPPED.

Descrimination should be stopped. Across the board. Not just for women. Not just for blacks. For Asians too. For redheads too. For muslims too. For everyone.

AND IT IS A BIG DEAL FOR ANYONE WHO GETS HARRASED FOR WHO THEY ARE, REGARDLESS OF THEIR SKIN COLOR OR CHROMOSOME MAKEUP.

No, I said nobody should get offended over a nonsense term like cracker which has no real negative context to it outside stuff just kinda made up out of anger of black slurs... while white people still held power so it dosen't really matter.

Not that white men should never be offended about anything ever in their lives.

In otherwords, that "racism" towards white people and "Sexism" towards men, isn't the same as it is towards black people and women.  There is too big of a historical and power differential there, therefore some things are just going to be offensive to only the party that's been wronged more.

Basically every deragatory insult against white people as a race has nothing behind it because people have always been on top.

That's totally different from being insulted individual charactersitics that isn't about your race.  You weren't being insulted for being white.  You were insulted for having red hair.  Often by white people.

That's bad yeah, and no I wouldn't just tell you to "grow up" in that case.  However I would tell you that's still not equitable to being made fun of for your race.

A White person and Hispanic person can both be upset at being called lazy.  However lazy is a sterotype against hispanics.  So yeah, the hispanic person should be more mad... and people should be more mad about it.

 

If Someone calls you and a Hispanic dude both fat?  Yeah, you both have a reason to be equally angry.



Around the Network
Kasz216 said:

No, I said nobody should get offended over a nonsense term like cracker which has no real negative context to it outside stuff just kinda made up out of anger of black slurs... while white people still held power so it dosen't really matter.

Not that white men should never be offended about anything ever in their lives.

In otherwords, that "racism" towards white people and "Sexism" towards men, isn't the same as it is towards black people and women.

Basically every deragatory insult against white people as a race has nothing behind it because people have always been on top.

That's totally different from being insulted individual charactersitics that isn't about your race.  You weren't being insulted for being white.  You were insulted for having red hair.  Often by white people.

That's bad yeah, and no I wouldn't just tell you to "grow up" in that case.  However I would tell you that's still not equitable to being made fun of for your race.

A White person and Hispanic person can both be upset at being called lazy.  However lazy is a sterotype against hispanics.  So yeah, the hispanic person should be more mad... and people should be more mad about it.

 

If Someone calls you and a Hispanic dude both fat?  Yeah, you both have a reason to be equally angry.

Just because you weigh one more than the other, doesn't mean the lighter one shouldn't be stopped as well.

Correction: I was made fun of for my skin color and hair mainly by whites and latinos. 

Being made fun of for my pale skin and red hair is being made fun of my biological makeup, whether it is "race" or not. It's the same thing, even if, as you say, it isn't *quite* as bad given the more brutal history. It is still bad. And it still needs to be stopped.

I wasn't called lazy, or anything random. I was called direct stereotypes for what I was born as. Your "lazy" and "fat" arguments hold nothing here.

People should not be allowed to make fun of others and descriminate against them based on what that person was genetically born as and any stereotypes that come along with it.

 

Plain and simple.



Kasz216 said:

Why should people feel bad about what happened to other peoples races and sexes.  It's called having empathy for people who aren't yourself.

Well, I for one don't have empathy for races or genders, but for people. In fact, I specifically strive to judge people by who they are rather than by these labels, not only because of how meaningless they are for anything other than pointing some biological differences, but also because I know what happens when you give them too much importance. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter whether we're talking about sexism, racism, religious discrimination or class warfare, or which group is favored over another... It's all the same. It's all about power, and using any excuse to get it. It's about discriminating people through these labels, generating resentment that wouldn't exist otherwise.

As long as people keep seeing things in terms of "teams" and keeping "score" of the offenses or gains, we'll never solve these issues. It's a never-ending, vicious circle. You can't solve discrimination with discrimination, just like you can't solve violence with violence. The only solution is to make these labels a non-issue. To not let them influence our judgement of these actions, as much as possible. And to let the past behind us by learning to not make the same mistakes, instead of making current generations carry the burden of those that came before them.

And I still don't know what makes the opinions of those women who aren't offended by this any less valid than those who do...



seiya19 said:

Kasz216 said:

Why should people feel bad about what happened to other peoples races and sexes.  It's called having empathy for people who aren't yourself.

Well, I for one don't have empathy for races or genders, but for people. In fact, I specifically strive to judge people by who they are rather than by these labels, not only because of how meaningless they are for anything other than pointing some biological differences, but also because I know what happens when you give them too much importance. At the end of the day, it doesn't matter whether we're talking about sexism, racism, religious discrimination or class warfare, or which group is favored over another... It's all the same. It's all about power, and using any excuse to get it. It's about discriminating people through these labels, generating resentment that wouldn't exist otherwise.

As long as people keep seeing things in terms of "teams" and keeping "score" of the offenses or gains, we'll never solve these issues. It's a never-ending, vicious circle. You can't solve discrimination with discrimination, just like you can't solve violence with violence. The only solution is to make these labels a non-issue. To not let them influence our judgement of these actions, as much as possible. And to let the past behind us by learning to not make the same mistakes, instead of making current generations carry the burden of those that came before them.

And I still don't know what makes the opinions of those women who aren't offended by this any less valid than those who do...


That's  kind of thinking has been tried before, and all it's led to is a rise in sexism, racism and antisemtism.  "Colorblind" policies that happen in uneven societies do nothing but maitnain the status quo and further

That you actually think your above judging people by their race and gender is a completely asinine statement.   Everyone is a product of their culture.  Everyone is sexist and racist.  Those who think they are above it are nothing more then people in denial of their own subconsious sexism and racism.  I'd suggest trying to honestly take the above harvard test I liked.

If you do take it honestly.  I imagine you'll be quite surprised.



wfz said:
Kasz216 said:

No, I said nobody should get offended over a nonsense term like cracker which has no real negative context to it outside stuff just kinda made up out of anger of black slurs... while white people still held power so it dosen't really matter.

Not that white men should never be offended about anything ever in their lives.

In otherwords, that "racism" towards white people and "Sexism" towards men, isn't the same as it is towards black people and women.

Basically every deragatory insult against white people as a race has nothing behind it because people have always been on top.

That's totally different from being insulted individual charactersitics that isn't about your race.  You weren't being insulted for being white.  You were insulted for having red hair.  Often by white people.

That's bad yeah, and no I wouldn't just tell you to "grow up" in that case.  However I would tell you that's still not equitable to being made fun of for your race.

A White person and Hispanic person can both be upset at being called lazy.  However lazy is a sterotype against hispanics.  So yeah, the hispanic person should be more mad... and people should be more mad about it.

 

If Someone calls you and a Hispanic dude both fat?  Yeah, you both have a reason to be equally angry.

Just because you weigh one more than the other, doesn't mean the lighter one shouldn't be stopped as well.

Correction: I was made fun of for my skin color and hair mainly by whites and latinos. 

Being made fun of for my pale skin and red hair is being made fun of my biological makeup, whether it is "race" or not. It's the same thing, even if, as you say, it isn't *quite* as bad given the more brutal history. It is still bad. And it still needs to be stopped.

I wasn't called lazy, or anything random. I was called direct stereotypes for what I was born as. Your "lazy" and "fat" arguments hold nothing here.

People should not be allowed to make fun of others and descriminate against them based on what that person was genetically born as and any stereotypes that come along with it.

 

Plain and simple.


No, but it does show why people pay a lot more attention to one then the other.  Which seems to be your complaint... which seems to be what your curious about.

Outside that... plenty of people are born with conditions that make them fat.  (or lazy for that matter.)


Like I said, what happened to you sucked.  It still doesn't compare though, it's not the context isn't quite there... it's that it's quite far from there.  What happened to these people in the past was very clear and very real dehumization right down to legally... built into society as a whole.

What happened to you was someone picking on you just because you were different... it didn't even have to deal with an "ideal male bodytype" just more how you stood out at the time compared other people there.  Were you in say ireland, or there were a few more people with the same skin tone, they'd of gone and picked on the short kid.

It sucks and i'm sure it could of sucked real hard... but it's not really the same  level as having the whole of society more or less structured to subconsiously hold you down because stereotypes about what you should be are programmed into everyones head subcounsiously... even best most tolerant person could be racist or sexist if they don't keep it in mind.  (Again, see harvard implicit results study.  Even Malcolm Gladwell, who is half black genetically, and identifies as black racially found that he ended up being unconsiously racist against black people.)

To say it's not *quite* the same is an understatement.

It's not like everyone in the world is subconsiously programmed to make fun of ginger people.  

If that were the case, and everytime someone made fun of you for it... you would of been in a hell of a lot more pain, no?  That's certaintly a pretty big weight on your shoulders at that point.  I think it's pretty obvious to see why someone would be extra sensitive about this stuff and why you would focus a lot more on not offending those people, since there is much stronger weight there. 

 

What Stereotypes even exist about someome being a "ginger".   The only thing that comes to mind is the South Park joke that they don't have souls.  (Legitamite question here... I'm actually curious.  Though that i have to ask is pretty telling in itself.)



Kasz216 said:

No, but it does show why people pay a lot more attention to one then the other.  Which seems to be your complaint... which seems to be what your curious about.

Outside that... plenty of people are born with conditions that make them fat.  (or lazy for that matter.)


Like I said, what happened to you sucked.  It still doesn't compare though, it's not the context isn't quite there... it's that it's quite far from there.  What happened to these people in the past was very clear and very real dehumization right down to legally... built into society as a whole.

What happened to you was someone picking on you just because you were different... it didn't even have to deal with an "ideal male bodytype" just more how you stood out at the time compared other people there.  Were you in say ireland, or there were a few more people with the same skin tone, they'd of gone and picked on the short kid.

It sucks and i'm sure it could of sucked real hard... but it's not really the same  level as having the whole of society more or less structured to subconsiously hold you down because stereotypes about what you should be are programmed into everyones head subcounsiously... even best most tolerant person could be racist or sexist if they don't keep it in mind.  (Again, see harvard implicit results study.  Even Malcolm Gladwell, who is half black genetically, and identifies as black racially found that he ended up being unconsiously racist against black people.)

To say it's not *quite* the same is an understatement.

It's not like everyone in the world is subconsiously programmed to make fun of ginger people.  

If that were the case, and everytime someone made fun of you for it... you would of been in a hell of a lot more pain, no?  That's certaintly a pretty big weight on your shoulders at that point.  I think it's pretty obvious to see why someone would be extra sensitive about this stuff and why you would focus a lot more on not offending those people, since there is much stronger weight there. 

 

What Stereotypes even exist about someome being a "ginger".   The only thing that comes to mind is the South Park joke that they don't have souls.  (Legitamite question here... I'm actually curious.  Though that i have to ask is pretty telling in itself.)

Whatever bro, keep speaking in a demeaning way towards my situation. It's cool. All I keep reiterating is that people should be discouraged from harrassing towards someone just because of how they were born. No matter what gender, race, or issue. You, on the other hand, only seem to care about the biggest issue (blacks and women) and don't care about the other issues.

I understand the larger focus on those, but what you're displaying is an outright LACK of care for any of the other problems. What I keep seeing from you is "Blacks and women are the two biggest issues, nothing else matters for descrimination."

A lot of issues exist outside of black and women descrimination, yet those are the only two you care about because they are the biggest? Like I said in a previous post, grow your mind, man. Start caring about the bigger picture. Descrimination like such on all levels is bad and should be discouraged throughout our society. Yes, women and black descrimination needs to end. But so does a lot of other stuff. But you don't seem to care about that at all because you constantly just keep focusing on those two issues.

"It's not like everyone in the world is subconsiously programmed to make fun of ginger people.  "

Holy crap, wait, what? People are subconsciously programmed to hate on blacks and women? That's news to me. (If that's not what you're implying, then I don't see how it fit in your post at all).

As for descrimination against redheads, it primarily revolves around redheads being ugly, being white and unable to tan, and in general being freaks for their different natural hair color. I've gotten the soulless joke as well a number of times since that South Park episode, and even if it is baseless, it hurts when people say it and everyone laughs at you. Even if it's untrue.