Kasz216 said:
At a buisness function? Again your talking about something that's going to be more exclusionatory towards women then men on average, because their is more of a negative context there. So yeah... that'd be somewhat sexist since it would be guranteed to turn off more of your women employees then your male employees, because again... context of history. Both offended men and women would totally have a point to be offended though. In a way it's being sexist to both groups.
Afterall, a racist guy who beleives every race has positive and negative steroetypes is still racist right? I mean, if someone believes black people are good at sports, but dumb. White people are natural leaders but have no rythem, Asians are geniuses but have small penises, Hispanic people are family oriented but lazy and that Native Americans were savage but attuned to nature. They'd still be REALLY fucking racist, and if they decided to put all of these steroetypes on Old Navy T-shirts... they'd still be really fucking racist. (Other racists left out because i don't know there stereotypes) That said the level of each offense can be measured by just how bad it's going to effect them. I have no rythm... isn't going to be effecting white people on average the same as Savage would effect Native Americans.
As such, more effort should be put towards the things that hurt more people because... people only have limited energy. Only makes seese to start "at the top" that is most damaging and move downwards once you take care of the worst ones. |
I don't like involving the context of history since it's just a burden when trying to move forward. All I care about is what is technically equal, here and now.
I LOVE ICELAND!
