JGarret said: Rich is a master troll! |
He is. Jim Sterling should take notes. This is how it's done.
JGarret said: Rich is a master troll! |
He is. Jim Sterling should take notes. This is how it's done.
This probably explains nintendo direct now
AlphaCielago said:
Wasn't Ninja Gaiden 3 already released earlier. It's different if you just add things to the game, in comparison to when you have the whole game and it's not released on other systems yet. |
Edit: nevermind
Asriel said:
|
No one knows the specific terms of the agreement between NCL and Platinum, but suffice it to say, Nintendo literally paid Platinum to resurrect Bayonetta 2. The only caveat was that it be a Wii U exclusive. Platinum gives Wii U the highly sought-after exclusive, and Nintendo does the rest. They're paying for all of the publishing, which is a fortune.
I'm happy for PS360-owners to get the game, but why the horrible delay Ubi?
pezus said:
|
People have it wrong on this one. NG3 was co-published by Nintendo, they were not the main publishers (Tecmo was), that means both companies had publishing rights of the game, so there were less "bottlenecks" to either of both companies to do "whatever they want" in terms of publishing the game.
Bayonetta 2 is purely "owned" (in terms of publishing) by Nintendo. Before you say anything, the Sega logo on the trailers is because Sega is helping developing the game (and they still have the rights of the IP) they don't have any publishing rights as far as I know. Sure a port could happen but it could be something similar to ME1 which took 5 years to appear on the PS3.
Nintendo and PC gamer
So Bayonetta 2 being made exclusive good, Rayman Legends going multi-platform bad?
Anyway.
Delaying the game for all three makes sense, actually. First, there won't be a needless duplication of advertising costs, and second, it's obvious the Wii U's installed base isn't where Ubisoft thought it would be, so they'll take hurting sales on that platform over possibly hurting sales on the other platforms. Seems pretty logical. Again, it's a simple situation where two consoles with a huge installed base > a single console with a tiny installed base.
Screamapillar said:
Note: Nintendo did publish Ninja Gaiden in the west. Hence, all the time they spent on it in their Nintendo Directs and using it in all of their promotional materials over the holiday. Same as they're doing with LEGO City. |
Well it was still released earlier on the other systems. Lego City is another story, when it comes to that. However, I do think I get what you mean, but I really don't think that Lego City will release outisde of Wii U and 3DS.
Check out my Upcoming Wii U Games 2014 Thread
3DS Friend Code: 4553 - 9954 - 4854. Name - David
pezus said:
Yes, but how different? It's not like ME1 wasn't ported to PC/PS3, Gears to PC, Razor's Edge to PS3/360 etc. |
It took 5 years and a studio buyout for it to go to PS3, while even to get it to go to PC, EA supposedly had to make some deal with Microsoft (i forget what it was, but some bargain was struck).
As far as anyone knows, Nintendo owns the publishing rights to Bayonetta 2, the game, solely, while rights to the Bayonetta IP are shared by Sega and Platinum Games.
Monster Hunter: pissing me off since 2010.
Yay. I knew it from day 1 that this would go multiplat. Origins is one of my favorite games ever. I was planning on buying this game with a WiiU at launch until it was delayed. Now I'm not sure when I'll pick up a Wii U.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo
Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.