By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Bayonetta 2 vs Final Fantasy XV announcement reactions show some double standards.

Zero999 on 25 September 2013
ListerOfSmeg said:
MohammadBadir said:
pokoko said:
badgenome said:
Or most people who have a PS3 are planning on getting a PS4, so they aren't missing out on anything.

That was cruel.  You shouldn't break the OP in the second comment, it's just inconsiderate.

On a side note, I love how "a few die-hard fans complaining online" turns into  "immense backslash".  I'm sorry, but only a relatively few people care about Bayonetta.  The exaggeration of that response is the only thing "immense" about it.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkUBfD5SCqU

Awesome post. I'd call that owned. Seriously though any claiming it was just a few must not have been online that day.

or the past 365 days.



Around the Network
DucksUnlimited on 25 September 2013
Zero999 said:
DucksUnlimited said:
Zero999 said:

"They found out that they're going to have to pay $350 to play a game that would have only cost $60"

 and now they found they will have to pay $400 instead of $60, to play something that was promised as a ps3 exclusive. so it is weird they don't complain.

better graphics and performance? so let's move every game announced for ps360 to the wii u/ps4/xone only. because better graphics, right? no one will get pissed.

Seeing as how most of them were already going to spend $400 on a PS4, no. Counting the cost of a console that they were going to get no matter what makes no sense. And most PS360 owners, at least on gaming forums where these complaints take place, are getting a PS4/One no matter what. A PS4 and FFXV is cheaper then a PS4 + a Wii U + Bayonetta 2.

I have no doubts you'll still struggle with this concept but I've done the best I can.

The only people getting pissed about FFXV not coming to PS3 are the ones not getting a PS4/Xbone. But you said that the people who do intend to get a PS4 should be mad about it. Please explain why.

why? 1-because they were told it would be on ps3. 2- few will buy it in the first year/ year and a half (in comparisson to the full installed base), so many will have to wait even more to play it.

1. Nobody could give a conceivable fuck about that as long as they own the console it is coming to. You're comparing that to a sequel coming to a console that many of the people who played the original game do not intend to buy, and saying that they're equivalent situations. Not even close.

2. We're talking about hardcore fans, as those are the ones complaining on internet forums. And most of them will buy the console in the first year/year and a half.



outlawauron on 26 September 2013
Zero999 said:
ListerOfSmeg said:
MohammadBadir said:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkUBfD5SCqU

Awesome post. I'd call that owned. Seriously though any claiming it was just a few must not have been online that day.

or the past 365 days.

I really still think you're reaching here. Game is a cult hit that only reached the numbers it did because of the bargain bin. The popularity of the series is completed dwarfed by so many franchises.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Mnementh on 26 September 2013
sergiodaly said:

well... in this case, it did not switch... and we are clearly discussing the case mentioned in the OP.
but, thanks for the history lesson...

I agree, the OP is a lame example.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

Soundwave on 26 September 2013

Sony fans, no offense, are simply childish about things like this. It's ok for the PS3/4 to have exclusives, but they throw a hissy fit if it's Nintendo or MS getting exclusives.

The constant Monster Hunter port begging for Vita going on 2 years now is just sad, but it's no different from what Sony used to do in the 90s/early 2000s when they kept GTA, Tomb Raider, Final Fantasy, Metal Gear, etc. off other platforms.