I guess if your view is that the Geekerwan analysis are Nintendo haters just trying to make it seem like Switch 2 is weaker than it is then that would be a valid viewpoint. There is nothing new about people making false claims about Nintendo hardware and its performance level we had it with wii u and Switch and in the end the people who were claiming the lower performance level were shown to be true. There is nothing new here. Non-technical people just choose what they want to believe but that doesn't actually make it true.

None of Nintendo's current consoles are hybrids, they are all mobile devices with docking functionality... The same functionality that phones and tablets have had for decades... Doesn't make my phone a Hybrid.

Mobile SoC, battery to play mobile, display, wireless connectivity, physical controls.

The fact that one device sells more than another doesn't impact me, you or anyone else and doesn't make one product better than another.
Your argument is stupid.

Considering part of the argument was portability... The smaller screen should be a benefit, not a hindrance.

120hz is great, it's a shame not many Switch games can benefit from it as it lacks the CPU horse power... Many games like Indiana Jones will be at 30fps, making the displays 120hz capability... Literally useless for that title.

HDR is a pointless feature as it cannot do HDR, the OLED Switch 1 model, despite also not being HDR... Gives a better "HDR-Like" experience with deeper blacks and colours.

The Switch 2's display is actually it's biggest weakness... So if you are going to try and use that terrible display in your argument, you are going to fall face first.
The Switch 2's panel exhibits really poor contrasts, colours and will exhibit excessive amounts of ghosting resulting in a very poor output, the Switch lite's LCD is factually better ironically, despite being smaller and only 60hz. - But that harkens back to hardware being more than just the black-and-white paper specs people use in their arguments.

I am not the one who started the comparisons.
I am literally taking everyone elses comparisons and blowing out the comparison to make their arguments look stupid when their arguments can be used to preference another device.

There is nothing wrong with preferring a laptop or Switch 2 over the Xbox Ally X/Rog Ally X.

It runs better on Switch 2 because of it's increased horsepower, not because of optimization.

Your argument is definitely stupid.

Pokemon will run better emulated on the Rog Ally X... And that's the irony of it all.

If TDP is your argument, just remember... Switch Lite is lower powered than the Switch 2, if I can take your argument and apply it to another device, it kinda makes your argument stupid.

I am not the one who initiated the original comparison. Don't push such lies.

As a bonus... There is no garbage E-Waste Game Key Cards. That's a very positive feature for PC handhelds to have.

SteamOS is actually a good OS, you should try it sometime instead of propagating nonesense.

None of Nintendo's current consoles are hybrids, they are all mobile devices with docking functionality... The same functionality that phones and tablets have had for decades... Doesn't make my phone a Hybrid.

Mobile SoC, battery to play mobile, display, wireless connectivity, physical controls.

The fact that one device sells more than another doesn't impact me, you or anyone else and doesn't make one product better than another.
Your argument is stupid.

Considering part of the argument was portability... The smaller screen should be a benefit, not a hindrance.

120hz is great, it's a shame not many Switch games can benefit from it as it lacks the CPU horse power... Many games like Indiana Jones will be at 30fps, making the displays 120hz capability... Literally useless for that title.

HDR is a pointless feature as it cannot do HDR, the OLED Switch 1 model, despite also not being HDR... Gives a better "HDR-Like" experience with deeper blacks and colours.

The Switch 2's display is actually it's biggest weakness... So if you are going to try and use that terrible display in your argument, you are going to fall face first.
The Switch 2's panel exhibits really poor contrasts, colours and will exhibit excessive amounts of ghosting resulting in a very poor output, the Switch lite's LCD is factually better ironically, despite being smaller and only 60hz. - But that harkens back to hardware being more than just the black-and-white paper specs people use in their arguments.

I am not the one who started the comparisons.
I am literally taking everyone elses comparisons and blowing out the comparison to make their arguments look stupid when their arguments can be used to preference another device.

There is nothing wrong with preferring a laptop or Switch 2 over the Xbox Ally X/Rog Ally X.

It runs better on Switch 2 because of it's increased horsepower, not because of optimization.

Your argument is definitely stupid.

Pokemon will run better emulated on the Rog Ally X... And that's the irony of it all.

If TDP is your argument, just remember... Switch Lite is lower powered than the Switch 2, if I can take your argument and apply it to another device, it kinda makes your argument stupid.

I am not the one who initiated the original comparison. Don't push such lies.

As a bonus... There is no garbage E-Waste Game Key Cards. That's a very positive feature for PC handhelds to have.

SteamOS is actually a good OS, you should try it sometime instead of propagating nonesense.

sc94597 already covered the Geekerwan point.

Saying a source may not be inherently accurate doesn't imply they're a "hater".

And actually, many claiming a lower performance level for Switch 1 were wrong; tons of people wrongly claimed for instance that it was on par or even less capable than PS3 and 360, which was untrue.

Same thing happened with Switch 2, with many claiming it was "just a PS4" which turned out to be false.

For every overestimation there was an underestimation, you're fixating on just the side you disagree with.

Where's FF7 Rebirth and Star Wars Outlaws and Assassin's Creed Shadows on the PS4 Pro? *crickets*

Switch 2 is competently running games a generation ahead of the PS4 (with ray tracing in Star Wars Outlaws case), Indiana Jones arriving soon also ... either the PS5 gen is a fraud generation/hardware or the Switch 2 is a generation ahead of the PS4. Can't have it both ways when ever it suits whatever the narrative is supposed to be this week. 

The number and ease of next-gen games coming to Switch 2 is becoming more and more evident, Resident Evil Requiem obviously releasing day and date with other versions and the hardware being praised by the developers is an obvious one. 

False equivalency.  The ps4 is old hardware and thus doesn't get new games.  In some cases, it could be hardware limitations, in others it could be complete lack of interest.  Just because a piece of hardware doesn't get a game doesn't mean it can't run it. 

The Switch 2 doesn't have Silent Hill F, because it can't run it, am I right?  Lol, of course not.  The Switch 2 could run it.      

Edit

Minimum GPU for RE9 is a 1660, the ps4 pro is around a 1060.  They are within 13% performance of each other.  If Capcom wanted to, RE9 could run on a ps4 pro.  

Minimum requirements for Survivor is a 1070 and is a next gen game only, yet it exists on the ps4.  Porting can be done.  Lack of games doesn't mean it can't be done, in most cases.  

Your argument, like always, is silly and flawed.  

All I know is, per DF... cyber, FF7 and now Kena all are closer to the ps4 version than the ps5 version...

Depends on which aspect we're talking about; in terms of data streaming, Cyberpunk and FF7 on Switch 2 both fall closer to PS5 than PS4, same for image quality, and in Cyberpunk's case also texture quality, while stuff like NPC density, shadows, and having a 30fps cap were more in line with PS4.