I thought the point of the thread was to include Nintendo published switch games on the plus service. I was assuming older releases. However those Nintendo are still selling those titles from a range of 30-50 plus dollars even on the early Switch titles. Why would they include them on a service if most their games don't even go for under 30 let alone 40 or 50 for most of them.

They could put some that have stagnated in sales on a Selects line for 20-30 which would be nice for late adopters. They've done it for GC, Wii, 3DS and a few other systems.

Because reasons?  Heck I don't know what people are thinking either.  The switch is a monster, clearly consumers are happy.

I buy Nintendo and I buy Gamepass. Or other way around: I love Gamepass, yet I also buy Nintendo. So yes, people who want that would buy Nintendo. At least one person.

I think all of the big three have areas, in which they could learn from the others.

MS also has a Horizon, and it isn't a shooter so needs to be mentioned separately.

In general, all three could and do learn lessons from each other. We would never have had the PlayStation wand controllers, Kinect, PlayStation All Stars, or even Breath of the Wild if these companies didn't study each other and other companies.

What could still be learned?
Nintendo could learn to have a better internet platform from Microsoft.
PlayStation could learn to have more family friendly games from Nintendo to expand their appeal to parents and young kids.
Microsoft could learn from PlayStation's ability to make stunning single player games.

And plenty more. Lots to learn for everyone.

Couldnt agree more.