I disagree with you about the water quality, but I do agree that it depends on what media your are watching. If you're accepting what the corporate media, and regulatory agencies, that don't want to be sued/liable, are saying; then yes, everything is okay. I prefer to believe the working class sounding the alarm.

https://thehill.com/changing-america/sustainability/infrastructure/516522-erin-brockovich-says-us-is-now-in-a-water

I don't see why Erin Brockavich would destroy her reputation on a lie; I also like to hear how people tell their stories like this lady here. You can't make up lies with so many intricate details on what is happening to her and her family. But you also can't convince people about a problem, if they are not personally affected by it. Just look at climate change.

Part 1: https://youtu.be/EVhziVzhCvM

Part 2: https://youtu.be/Y1OuYKaXvcQ

This is water were talking about, everyone is going to be affected by it; if you wish to ignore it, lets see how much you're going to like that medical tax down the road.

You assume that I disagree with the law against child pornography because I called the Society in America Hypocrites? Please don't jump to conclusions like that. I would advice you follow up with the whole message first. I underline the hypocrisy by showing an example you completely dismiss and don't care about: Water quality.

"And of course I don't give a shit about the water quality point. It's completely irrelevant as far as I'm concerned."

But it is quite relevant to the point I was trying to make. Hypocrisy. That is what it is folks. They only care about their own agenda.

They only care about the mental/physical health of kids, when it matters to them, but they don't when it gets in the way of what they deem okay, Like profits. That was my point. In the age of spin, people will tell you that killing others for profit is not to be considered important enough to be reported/examined, but having crude plot points in a movie from a different culture: that has cross the line, and must be examined.

Of course they have control over what products are available on their platform. But just because you don't like the product doesn't mean they won't make it available for others who do.

I reject your false analogy. It would be like making thongs for preteens and having them available. Oh wait, they do have that...

I will add that simply because you find something to be sexual doesn't mean that it is sexual intrinsically.

I don't think you realize what the movie is about...

Pretends to be about a criticism over the sexualization of underage (which could still be made with 18 year old girls that look teenagers and would still have the same basic meaning), but it achieves that by doing children and teens do sexually provocative dance and get close ups, so again she admitted to tape what she seemed in real life, and that in real life it was to be sexually provocative.

And no one can say someone is assexual and at the same time do sexual activities with intention.

I wonder, would everyone be fine with the movie if it was all CGI?

ah so you did get it. But what's your problem with it?

It's based on real life events that are 100% legal. Assuming someone in the audience filmed the dance choreography, would it suddenly turn into something illegal?

Also what's the difference between girls voluntarily doing a sexually provocative dance in real life and girls voluntarily trying to enact it in a movie?

In the end it's just girls trying out stuff that they are seeing everyday in social media and music videos.

Thats effing disgusting and I hope Netflix and whoever made this get punished for this. 3 seconds of that material is more than enough to understand this is wrong in so many levels. I just can't understand how there are people defending this with a straight face. I was born in the Netherlands and people mention here that in Europe we are more okay for nudity but that is not really true. Some movies have received rightfully backlash. We are then not talking about a kid in bath of which you can see a face. And then this Cuties movie....That's not okay here. By far.

Cuties is meant to be a commentary on how the world is influencing children to act more sexual, and why this is very clearly a bad thing. A lot of people are comparing it to how war pieces are also meant to showcase how war is bad.

The difference being, in war pieces, no actual wars are being shown. All of the characters are actors, nobody actually dies, all the blood and gore is fake. With Cuties, there is an actual shot of an 11 year old topless. That is an actual case of child pornography. Imagine if a war movie actually murdered someone on screen and showcased them actually fighting for their life as they died. That would be the equivalent here, and people would be just as disgusted.

I wouldn`t watch but would be ok with it being on the platform (sure under the law of the country you are then the rating should be made accordingly).

It is legal for two teenager to have sex, but it isn`t legal to tape it much less to distribute.

As someone else said if they were doing a documentary type and there were no close ups and such it would be much less problematic.