Forums - Movies Discussion - Netflix Loses Millions of Subscriptions Over Controversial Film, "Cuties" For Sexploiting Children

SvennoJ said:
DonFerrari said:

If Cutties were animation, CGI or anything similar I would have no issue, since yes fictional world, no real underage person damaged or exposed, etc. But since it had real child doing obscene stuff and being tapped it can`t be defended for being work of art.

Similar to a game or movie with violence or killing is totally fine since no real person or animal was harmed but if you decided to hit people on the street and tape it, wouldn`t be considered ok and art even if you done it with intention to talk against violence (by commiting it).

City of God is one of my top 10 movies, very well critiqued and has children acting out very violent things.

Yes I like the movie, but certainly as a father whenever I see some scenes of violence that involved minors acting on then or being present I really don`t like it.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Around the Network
OhNoYouDont said:
Netflix didn't make this movie...it's simply a movie available on their platform. It's like going to the supermarket and getting pissed at the store for having dildos available.

I wouldn't put dildos in my grocery store but some people like dildos.

Eeeerrr a store is responsible for what it sells. So if it was allowing illegal material to be sold on their store they would be responsible as sellers. Same if they were reselling stolen merchandise or any other crime.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

After reading all the comments I have to watch this movie only so I can get a perspective on context. I know when I was growing up, I use to get into a lot of sexual situations at a very young age. They happen between myself and other boys, myself with girls. I do remember during those times not understand jack squat what I was doing but doing it either based on imitation or some obscured learned behavior depending on the incident. I know when it came to girls, some situations I did on my own but a lot of times they were initiated by the girl. As a father today, those situations has tempered how I speak to both my sons and daughter but what it definitely has done is not make me think just because my child is very young, either my son or daughter would not find themselves in sexual situations or even be the one to initiate it. The thing is, parents have to be even re vigilant now then before because information is so easy to obtain whether they have their own device or another child does. Not having early conversations on sex and teaching them what it means early and often is better than them getting it from some friend who has not clue but is throwing out a bunch of crap trying to understand its meaning. Either way, the face your child shows you at home is definite not the same person they show around their friends or even how they could behave. I wonder if this is what this movie is trying to portray.



Pedophilia possession is as illegal as crack, if not worst because the American hypocrite society has deemed it so. Never mind the other horrible things people don't pay attention to here, like lead, plastic, and other pollutants in American water quality and how it affects developing minds. To me, that is a more horrible crime than a stupid movie with controversial plot points. They wont give shit about their water, but they want Netflix to suffer for streaming a foreign movie that comes from a different culture.

Hypocrisy. That is what it is folks. They only care about their own agenda, and use the health of kids as a tool get what they want, but if it the health of the population, including poor kids is stopping the way of profits, then they don't give a rats ass.



DraconianAC said:
Pedophilia possession is as illegal as crack, if not worst because the American hypocrite society has deemed it so. Never mind the other horrible things people don't pay attention to here, like lead, plastic, and other pollutants in American water quality and how it affects developing minds. To me, that is a more horrible crime than a stupid movie with controversial plot points. They wont give shit about their water, but they want Netflix to suffer for streaming a foreign movie that comes from a different culture.

Hypocrisy. That is what it is folks. They only care about their own agenda, and use the health of kids as a tool get what they want, but if it the health of the population, including poor kids is stopping the way of profits, then they don't give a rats ass.

huh? Are you saying people having child porn shouldn't be worse than them having drugs?

Because I really don't think child porn being the worse offence there is a bad thing. To be fair I don't think having drugs should be illegal full stop, but still even if that weren't the case child porn being considered worse definitely isn't wrong.



Bet Shiken that COD would outsell Battlefield in 2018. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8749702

Around the Network
Ka-pi96 said:
DraconianAC said:
Pedophilia possession is as illegal as crack, if not worst because the American hypocrite society has deemed it so. Never mind the other horrible things people don't pay attention to here, like lead, plastic, and other pollutants in American water quality and how it affects developing minds. To me, that is a more horrible crime than a stupid movie with controversial plot points. They wont give shit about their water, but they want Netflix to suffer for streaming a foreign movie that comes from a different culture.

Hypocrisy. That is what it is folks. They only care about their own agenda, and use the health of kids as a tool get what they want, but if it the health of the population, including poor kids is stopping the way of profits, then they don't give a rats ass.

huh? Are you saying people having child porn shouldn't be worse than them having drugs?

Because I really don't think child porn being the worse offence there is a bad thing. To be fair I don't think having drugs should be illegal full stop, but still even if that weren't the case child porn being considered worse definitely isn't wrong.

I put my bold lettering on my point in case you missed it.

As for possession of pedophilia and possession of crack, how interesting that those two crimes are items that can be planted on a personal belongings, and no one would know other than the authorities that made the arrest.

Please don't put words in my mouth. I did NOT give my opinion about what I think about the crime. I only said "Pedophilia possession is as illegal as crack, if not worst" in the USA. If you don't believe me, look it up.

Edit: Interesting that you didn't give a shit about the water quality point that I made.



DraconianAC said:
Pedophilia possession is as illegal as crack, if not worst because the American hypocrite society has deemed it so. Never mind the other horrible things people don't pay attention to here, like lead, plastic, and other pollutants in American water quality and how it affects developing minds. To me, that is a more horrible crime than a stupid movie with controversial plot points. They wont give shit about their water, but they want Netflix to suffer for streaming a foreign movie that comes from a different culture.

Hypocrisy. That is what it is folks. They only care about their own agenda, and use the health of kids as a tool get what they want, but if it the health of the population, including poor kids is stopping the way of profits, then they don't give a rats ass.

What a strange take. I don't know what news source you've been watching, but drinking water problems are nowhere near as widespread as you seem to think. Over 90% of US communities have safe public water. Lead contamination is the biggest issue for sure in the remaining less than 10%, but it is one that has improved dramatically over the last few decades, in 1993 it was estimated that 40m Americans were using public water with harmful levels of lead, that number has decreased alot since then with many cities and towns taking Federal and State assistance to help pay for pipe replacements in older homes that were built before newer pipe types became the standard. Many other communities have begun adding safe anti-corrosive additives to their public water, which help to prevent existing lead pipes from releasing harmful amounts of lead (as well as helping to prevent steel and copper pipes from corroding), which is much more cost effective than full pipe replacement initiatives. 

Last edited by shikamaru317 - 4 days ago

DraconianAC said:
Ka-pi96 said:

huh? Are you saying people having child porn shouldn't be worse than them having drugs?

Because I really don't think child porn being the worse offence there is a bad thing. To be fair I don't think having drugs should be illegal full stop, but still even if that weren't the case child porn being considered worse definitely isn't wrong.

I put my bold lettering on my point in case you missed it.

As for possession of pedophilia and possession of crack, how interesting that those two crimes are items that can be planted on a personal belongings, and no one would know other than the authorities that made the arrest.

Please don't put words in my mouth. I did NOT give my opinion about what I think about the crime. I only said "Pedophilia possession is as illegal as crack, if not worst" in the USA. If you don't believe me, look it up.

Edit: Interesting that you didn't give a shit about the water quality point that I made.

You also said "because the American hypocrite society has deemed it so" to me that heavily implies you disagree with it. If you don't think so then it's not really useful for criticising "American hypocrite society", so why even mention it?

And of course I don't give a shit about the water quality point. It's completely irrelevant as far as I'm concerned.



Bet Shiken that COD would outsell Battlefield in 2018. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8749702

Barozi said:
ArchangelMadzz said:

I'm not saying this kind of movie shouldn't be made.

I'm saying they could've done it in a different way. 

This isn't necessary

Again I haven't seen the movie but since someone here claimed that there isn't even any nudity in the movie, I did some research and according to Forbes, the breast in that internet video does not belong to a minor.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/rachelsandler/2020/09/12/ted-cruz-falsely-claims-netflixs-cuties-shows-child-nudity-in-call-for-doj-probe/#5de3c744c162

The rest seems to be exactly what the director was aiming for.

Here's an interview with the producer:

What was the inspiration for this project?
It came from Maïmouna’s personal experience. She grew up in a large family living in one room in the 19th district of Paris, in a social housing project. She regularly goes back to the neighborhood to see her family and in one of the local festivities she saw a group of young 11-year-old girls dancing very provocatively to an audience with many mothers wearing traditional head scarves. She found it fascinating and disturbing and it raised the question of what role models young women can follow. It’s a very visceral movie. It really got under her skin and we feel it.

https://variety.com/2020/film/global/zangro-sundance-cuties-1203467120/

So basically she wanted to film what she has seen in real life. Wouldn't work nearly as well if she casted 16-year-olds and pretended they were 14 in the movie.

Also seriously? 11-year-olds watching porn on smartphones? You have to be pretty naive to assume that this is uncommon.

Well from her interview she is acknowleding that she was doing very provocative poses and taping. So yes it was sexual exploitation.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

shikamaru317 said:
DraconianAC said:
Pedophilia possession is as illegal as crack, if not worst because the American hypocrite society has deemed it so. Never mind the other horrible things people don't pay attention to here, like lead, plastic, and other pollutants in American water quality and how it affects developing minds. To me, that is a more horrible crime than a stupid movie with controversial plot points. They wont give shit about their water, but they want Netflix to suffer for streaming a foreign movie that comes from a different culture.

Hypocrisy. That is what it is folks. They only care about their own agenda, and use the health of kids as a tool get what they want, but if it the health of the population, including poor kids is stopping the way of profits, then they don't give a rats ass.

What a strange take. I don't know what news source you've been watching, but drinking water problems are nowhere near as widespread as you seem to think. Over 90% of US communities have safe public water. Lead contamination is the biggest issue for sure in the remaining less than 10%, but it is one that has improved dramatically over the last few decades, in 1993 it was estimated that 40m Americans were using public water with harmful levels of lead, that number has decreased alot since then with many cities and towns taking Federal and State assistance to help pay for pipe replacements in older homes that were built before newer pipe types became the standard. Many other communities have begun adding safe anti-corrosive additives to their public water, which help to prevent existing lead pipes for releasing harmful amounts of lead, which is much more cost effective than full pipe replacement initiatives. 

I disagree with you about the water quality, but I do agree that it depends on what media your are watching. If you're accepting what the corporate media, and regulatory agencies, that don't want to be sued/liable, are saying; then yes, everything is okay. I prefer to believe the working class sounding the alarm.

https://thehill.com/changing-america/sustainability/infrastructure/516522-erin-brockovich-says-us-is-now-in-a-water

I don't see why Erin Brockavich would destroy her reputation on a lie; I also like to hear how people tell their stories like this lady here. You can't make up lies with so many intricate details on what is happening to her and her family. But you also can't convince people about a problem, if they are not personally affected by it. Just look at climate change.

Part 1: https://youtu.be/EVhziVzhCvM

Part 2: https://youtu.be/Y1OuYKaXvcQ

This is water were talking about, everyone is going to be affected by it; if you wish to ignore it, lets see how much you're going to like that medical tax down the road.