By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
SvennoJ said:
I wonder, would everyone be fine with the movie if it was all CGI?

I wouldn`t watch but would be ok with it being on the platform (sure under the law of the country you are then the rating should be made accordingly).

Barozi said:
DonFerrari said:

Pretends to be about a criticism over the sexualization of underage (which could still be made with 18 year old girls that look teenagers and would still have the same basic meaning), but it achieves that by doing children and teens do sexually provocative dance and get close ups, so again she admitted to tape what she seemed in real life, and that in real life it was to be sexually provocative.

And no one can say someone is assexual and at the same time do sexual activities with intention.

ah so you did get it. But what's your problem with it?

It's based on real life events that are 100% legal. Assuming someone in the audience filmed the dance choreography, would it suddenly turn into something illegal?

Also what's the difference between girls voluntarily doing a sexually provocative dance in real life and girls voluntarily trying to enact it in a movie?

In the end it's just girls trying out stuff that they are seeing everyday in social media and music videos.

It is legal for two teenager to have sex, but it isn`t legal to tape it much less to distribute.

As someone else said if they were doing a documentary type and there were no close ups and such it would be much less problematic.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."