By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Barozi said:
DonFerrari said:

Well from her interview she is acknowleding that she was doing very provocative poses and taping. So yes it was sexual exploitation.

I don't think you realize what the movie is about...

Pretends to be about a criticism over the sexualization of underage (which could still be made with 18 year old girls that look teenagers and would still have the same basic meaning), but it achieves that by doing children and teens do sexually provocative dance and get close ups, so again she admitted to tape what she seemed in real life, and that in real life it was to be sexually provocative.

And no one can say someone is assexual and at the same time do sexual activities with intention.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."