By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sales - August NPD 2020: Switch 504k, PS4 197k, XBO 45k

Nintendo Switch is still facing stock problems in Japan and WorldWide but still managed to sell many consoles because Nintendo knows the demand for that is huge while Sony didn't even bother to replenish the stock in Japan because demand isn't that big and probably didn't worth the hassle.

It doesn't change much from 1-2k PS4 sales to 6-10k sales because those numbers are still low. 



Around the Network
src said:
Jranation said:

I thought both Sony and MS reduced production for PS4 and XB1 to make room for next gen? 

Reduced production =/ sold out

So again, please post evidence of XB1 being sold out in US at that time period.

Oh sorry I dont have any evidence. I just read that from somewhere which I dont remember. But my point still stands. 



Pocky Lover Boy! 

https://www.theverge.com/2020/7/16/21327330/microsoft-xbox-one-x-s-digital-edition-discontinued



Ryng said:
@Shadow1980
I really like reading your post most of the times and you are one of my favourite user in those threads.
I hope you'll see this comment as an advice and not criticism.

I think something you are missing as a predictor is the "fantasy". That's actually a very important factor. Fantasy does not mean making unrealistic and stupid predictions, it just mean that you can see things outside of the written story. I talked about something very similar in a youtube video, where people were saying "NO YOU CAN'T SAY AC NH WILL SELL FOR SURE 10 MILLION IN JAPAN, THAT'S MORE THAN THE BEST SELLING GAME", and is very worthless to say i was right.

Looking at the history of the market is very important for predictions, i totally agree, and that's why i think you are a very good analist. (yes i just used the word analist)
but lack of fantasy is a big problem, and if you wanna be one of the best, you really should start to be more brave with your predictions. Fuck if something seem insane, if you find reasons to something crazy happening, and you have the felling of a crazy prediction happening, then just do it. Look at me and Tbone. We don't give a fuck what people say, and we keep doing a lot of good predictions.

I will not reply to every points you made, because you can understand is just so much to read. if you want my opinion on the whole Animal Crossing, COVID, and Switch sales, i'll just say this:

COVID or not COVID, there's no way Switch would have sold less in 2020 than in 2019. Switch is not just slighly up YOY, it's massacring last year peformance, WITH SHORTAGES, there is no way that withouth COVID Switch would be down YOY right now. 2020 was destinated to be up YOY.
Now, if the biggest reason for this increase is COVID, or Animal Crossing, i don't really care. All i know is that both had a very important role, and made those insane numbers possible.

I believe the word you are looking for is "imagination" instead of "fantasy".  (I am just saying this, because I am aware that English is not your first language.)  The overall point of your first two paragraphs is, "Looking at past history is important, but under unusual circumstances imagination is also very important."

I also agree with the point of your last paragraph.  The main problem with the conclusions of @Shadow1980 is that he is ignoring the magnitude to which the Switch is up YoY.  People who study a lot of data are actually the most susceptible to confirmation bias, because we all naturally tend to focus on the data which reinforces what we already believe.  It can happen to the best of us.  Normally the way to get around this is to make a prediction.  If your prediction is right, then your explanation becomes stronger.  If your prediction is wrong, then you are supposed to change your beliefs about what is happening.  Here is what happened with Shadow1980.

He predicted, "PS4, XB1 and NSW will all be down YoY in 2020."  Here is what the data (worldwide) is currently saying:

2019 YTD 2020 YTD growth
NSW    8,199,543    15,597,300 90.2%
PS4    8,243,566      7,222,247 -12.4%
XB1    2,063,413      2,166,685 5.0%

His prediction was right about PS4, wrong about XB1 and massively wrong about Switch.  COVID alone would be enough to explain why XB1 is up YoY, but that isn't sufficient to explain the Switch's massive growth.  He wants to explain everything away with COVID, because he wants to stick to all of his current assumptions about how the video game market works.  That is confirmation bias.  He also tends to only use US data only, and the US just happens to be where the effects of COVID are the largest and longest lasting.  That further fuels his confirmation bias.  NPD data isn't even that reliable anymore, because it all comes from leaks at this point, but he insists on using US data.

Now I do agree with Shadow1980 on one thing.  Animal Crossing alone doesn't explain the Switch's massive growth.  However, the idea that COVID alone expains the Switch's sales is an even worse explanation.  There is actually more going on here than COVID+Animal Crossing, but Shadow's explanation is that it is less going on.  He thinks it's COVID alone.



RolStoppable said:
The_Liquid_Laser said:

I believe the word you are looking for is "imagination" instead of "fantasy".  (I am just saying this, because I am aware that English is not your first language.)  The overall point of your first two paragraphs is, "Looking at past history is important, but under unusual circumstances imagination is also very important."

I also agree with the point of your last paragraph.  The main problem with the conclusions of @Shadow1980 is that he is ignoring the magnitude to which the Switch is up YoY.  People who study a lot of data are actually the most susceptible to confirmation bias, because we all naturally tend to focus on the data which reinforces what we already believe.  It can happen to the best of us.  Normally the way to get around this is to make a prediction.  If your prediction is right, then your explanation becomes stronger.  If your prediction is wrong, then you are supposed to change your beliefs about what is happening.  Here is what happened with Shadow1980.

He predicted, "PS4, XB1 and NSW will all be down YoY in 2020."  Here is what the data (worldwide) is currently saying:

2019 YTD 2020 YTD growth
NSW    8,199,543    15,597,300 90.2%
PS4    8,243,566      7,222,247 -12.4%
XB1    2,063,413      2,166,685 5.0%

His prediction was right about PS4, wrong about XB1 and massively wrong about Switch.  COVID alone would be enough to explain why XB1 is up YoY, but that isn't sufficient to explain the Switch's massive growth.  He wants to explain everything away with COVID, because he wants to stick to all of his current assumptions about how the video game market works.  That is confirmation bias.  He also tends to only use US data only, and the US just happens to be where the effects of COVID are the largest and longest lasting.  That further fuels his confirmation bias.  NPD data isn't even that reliable anymore, because it all comes from leaks at this point, but he insists on using US data.

Now I do agree with Shadow1980 on one thing.  Animal Crossing alone doesn't explain the Switch's massive growth.  However, the idea that COVID alone expains the Switch's sales is an even worse explanation.  There is actually more going on here than COVID+Animal Crossing, but Shadow's explanation is that it is less going on.  He thinks it's COVID alone.

That kind of post isn't going to get us any further.

1. This is an NPD thread, so the focus will naturally be on US sales.

2. He doesn't think that it's COVID alone. The point of contention this month and in the past month has been how much of an effect COVID has had; neither side took the stance that it is a single factor alone that has resulted in this year's Switch sales.

3. You have to play dumb to call him wrong on the XB1 because it's a foregone conclusion that it will finish 2020 down year over year.

We have already been dealing with long posts from both sides, but if time's going to be wasted on sorting out strawman arguments, then we won't be getting anywhere.

Not sure why you are arguing with me.  We both think Shadow1980 is wrong, but you can't stand that I'm saying he is wrong in a different way, lol.  Anyway, as to your points...

1. True this is an NPD thread, but Shadow1980 mostly only makes these posts in NPD threads.  He seems to mostly ignore worldwide data or data from other regions.  Shadow1980 will sometimes make comments about how well Switch will sell worldwide, but his explanations always come back to US data.  It's a lot harder to come to these same conclusions when data from other regions is taken into account.

2.  His position is that the sales boost of the past two months is due to COVID plus stimulus checks, which themselves are a result of COVID.  He is in fact saying that the sales boost is due to COVID alone.

3.  You are nitpicking at a few words while missing my whole point.  XB1 sales are higher so far this year than what most people would have predicted on January 1, 2020.  This sales boost can be explained entiredly due to COVID.  However the Switch sales boost is much, much greater.  COVID alone does not explain why this sales boost is so much higher than XB1.



Around the Network
RolStoppable said:
The_Liquid_Laser said:

I believe the word you are looking for is "imagination" instead of "fantasy".  (I am just saying this, because I am aware that English is not your first language.)  The overall point of your first two paragraphs is, "Looking at past history is important, but under unusual circumstances imagination is also very important."

I also agree with the point of your last paragraph.  The main problem with the conclusions of @Shadow1980 is that he is ignoring the magnitude to which the Switch is up YoY.  People who study a lot of data are actually the most susceptible to confirmation bias, because we all naturally tend to focus on the data which reinforces what we already believe.  It can happen to the best of us.  Normally the way to get around this is to make a prediction.  If your prediction is right, then your explanation becomes stronger.  If your prediction is wrong, then you are supposed to change your beliefs about what is happening.  Here is what happened with Shadow1980.

He predicted, "PS4, XB1 and NSW will all be down YoY in 2020."  Here is what the data (worldwide) is currently saying:

2019 YTD 2020 YTD growth
NSW    8,199,543    15,597,300 90.2%
PS4    8,243,566      7,222,247 -12.4%
XB1    2,063,413      2,166,685 5.0%

His prediction was right about PS4, wrong about XB1 and massively wrong about Switch.  COVID alone would be enough to explain why XB1 is up YoY, but that isn't sufficient to explain the Switch's massive growth.  He wants to explain everything away with COVID, because he wants to stick to all of his current assumptions about how the video game market works.  That is confirmation bias.  He also tends to only use US data only, and the US just happens to be where the effects of COVID are the largest and longest lasting.  That further fuels his confirmation bias.  NPD data isn't even that reliable anymore, because it all comes from leaks at this point, but he insists on using US data.

Now I do agree with Shadow1980 on one thing.  Animal Crossing alone doesn't explain the Switch's massive growth.  However, the idea that COVID alone expains the Switch's sales is an even worse explanation.  There is actually more going on here than COVID+Animal Crossing, but Shadow's explanation is that it is less going on.  He thinks it's COVID alone.

That kind of post isn't going to get us any further.

1. This is an NPD thread, so the focus will naturally be on US sales.

2. He doesn't think that it's COVID alone. The point of contention this month and in the past month has been how much of an effect COVID has had; neither side took the stance that it is a single factor alone that has resulted in this year's Switch sales.

3. You have to play dumb to call him wrong on the XB1 because it's a foregone conclusion that it will finish 2020 down year over year.

We have already been dealing with long posts from both sides, but if time's going to be wasted on sorting out strawman arguments, then we won't be getting anywhere.

1. Yes

2. Nobody is denying Covid effect here, shadow creates a strawman argument if he thinks this. The COVID helps a lot all videogames, because all outside activities go down, and videogame have grows because of this. But the Nintendo grown is drive by Animal Crossing. 

3. XB1 and PS5 go down. Switch depends more on the game output and this game's outputs bring different tier of consumers. 



honestly, i think it just comes down to shadow massively underestimating just how much of a viral phenomenon animal crossing was and continues to be. i don't think any game comes close to the internet presence this has, other than maybe like peak fortnite and thats a F2P game. you cant use historical analysis for a game like this - a full priced exclusive selling 22 million in a few months is completely unprecedented territory. this game is frankly an outlier.

taking AC out of the equation, everything else shadow says makes sense



src said:
Kai_Mao said:

Might as well say XB1 has been supply constrained ever since it released in Japan :P

Even if Sony was interested in ramping up supply for PS4 in Japan, I'm not sure if it would make much of a difference. It would still struggle to even be a challenge to Switch or even make it to 10 million sold LT. I guess at this point, Sony is more focused on getting PS5 off the ground.

Except the XB1 has not been supply constrained. If you want to just make things up and throw it out there in a vain attempt to misinform then sure.

There's a massive difference of 10k per week vs 1k per week over 5+ weeks and said difference will only continue to grow.

Either way, the point still stands of XB getting absolutely dominated by PS in a country that makes up for nearly 60% of its sales.

And the PS4 wouldn't be if Sony had any interest in Japan. But they are also switching production and Japan only gets the scaps.

And why is that? Because Sony is prioritizing the other regions. Microsoft is doing the same with the Xbox, but they cut production more aggressively and thus ran out of consoles halfway through the year and has been supply constrained ever since in all regions.

So if you're claiming that Sony's weak sales in Japan are only due to low supply, anybody else could return that same argument against you for Microsoft in any region right now.



Shadow1980 said:

More charts!

Now for the assorted lead/deficit and associated charts:

The combined surplus the PS4 & XBO have over the 360 & PS3 remains over 3 million units, but we should expect it to get lower than that. In fact, the continued existence of that surplus is likely in jeopardy. In September, the PS4 runs up against what was GTAV's launch month on the PS3, that game causing a big jump in PS3 sales over the previous month. While the PS4 continues to have a large insurmountable surplus, that could dip a bit next month, though after that its lead should resume growing. The XBO meanwhile continues to see its deficit against the 360 grow. Whatever leads the PS4 gains against the PS3, the XBO's deficit negates and then some, resulting in the downward slide we've seen in their net surplus (which was briefly reversed a bit and continues to be slowed down by the COVID bump). Considering that the 360 had one extra year before being replaced, that 3M-unit surplus could evaporate completely before the PS4 & XBO are discontinued as the XBO's deficit is likely to accelerate its growth next year. However, even if they fall behind, the fact that the PS4 & XBO having one fewer year than the 360 is what caused them to do so shows how well they have been selling during the generation proper.



Where exactly the Switch will end up at the end of its life is still up in the air. At this point, it's clear that it should get to at least 40M in the U.S. That's enough to put it into the Top 5 best-selling systems ever in the U.S. But how far past 40M remains to be seen. Some people are convinced it can do a lot better than even that, maybe even become the new #1. However, to do that it needs to get past the reigning kings of consoles and handhelds: the PS2 and DS.

Beat the DS is an uphill battle, one that the Switch will probably lose. The DS sold a staggering 53.5M units in the U.S. lifetime. While it started off with a surplus against the DS, that surplus has been shrinking (and note that I'm not even counting the 1225k units the DS sold in its launch quarter). While the March-May period did reverse that a bit, the surplus is once again starting to shrink. The Switch will need to have a near record-setting holiday season this year and maintain an average baseline of at least 125k/week (500k/month for a 4-week month) in 2021 just to keep pace. Considering that even with this year's sales having been boosted by the one-two punch of AC and the pandemic the Switch has sold on average about 123k units per week over the past eight months, there are reasonable doubts that it can keep things up at this level for another year or two.

And to even start to challenge the DS, the Switch has to get past the PS2. It currently continues to run a deficit against the PS2. That deficit is currently shrinking, though the majority of that deficit reduction came in just the past six months, and half of it from just March & April. The PS2 did after all peak earlier than the Switch, which may currently be at its peak here in its fourth year. But will the Switch's deficit evaporate and become a surplus? Perhaps. The PS2 did have a weak holiday season in 2004 due to shortages of the Slim, and that could very well get them to be a near match (though again, I am excluding the PS2's launch quarter here, which amounted to 1.1M units). But even if the Switch does gain a surplus, that could once again go into full reverse and head back to deficit territory. If it does, that'll be because of the PS2's long tail. Unlike every other system, it did not suffer a massive drop the year it was replaced and it continued to sell well for a while after the PS3 was released, selling nearly 11.3M units from Nov. 2013 onward. That was a big reason it was able to hold on to its title as the reigning #1 home console ever despite formidable challenges by the Wii and Xbox 360. Can the Switch succeed where those other systems failed? Maybe, but it's far from guaranteed. If the Switch drops back down to 2019 levels next year, it will probably fail to pass the PS2. Nintendo systems have poor legs, and once the Switch is inevitably replaced that's going to hurt it against the PS2's long tail.

***

@javi741. AC is the fastest-selling Nintendo exclusive worldwide. In the U.S., maybe not. It's not clear, as we haven't gotten exact sales figures for each month, plus NPD doesn't track digital. We do know that, of all Nintendo exclusives ever, it sold only the third-highest amount of copies at retail in its first month. Smash Ultimate is #1 at about 3.6M copies and Smash Brawl is at #2 at 2.7M copies (SSBU apparently also had, and possibly still has, the #1 debut of any exclusive on any system ever). So, that puts a hard upper limit of 2.7M for the number of physical copies that AC sold in March. For all we know it could be a good bit less than that (I'm not sure what the previous #3 best-debuting Nintendo exclusive was in the U.S., but if we knew it, it would give us the floor for AC's sales at retail in March). And we do know that AC sold 179k at retail in August, so for all we know it could have been very front-loaded.

While we don't know the digital split for Nintendo games, based on an estimate by Nielsen the WW split was something like 40-45% digital for AC in its first month, which if that's also the case for the U.S. would put AC at between 4.5-4.9M copies sold in the March sales period, at most. If SSBU sales were less than 25% digital in its first month, then AC beats it, but maybe not by much. Even with only 10% digital share in the U.S., SSBU still sold at least 4M copies. But considering that Nintendo never came out and bragged about AC beating SSBU in the U.S., that isn't encouraging for AC beating it for all-time #1 best debut ever for an exclusive.

And we've seen what other games that have had very high first-month sales have done. Halo 3 sold 3.3M in its first month in the U.S., and it's unlikely to have moved much more than 200k surplus 360 units that month. GTAV sold some 7M copies at retail between the 360 & PS3 in its first month, yet moved roughly 175k surplus units of both systems that month. And if we attribute all of the Switch's YoY growth in Dec. 2018 to just Smash Ultimate, then it moved only about 260k surplus Switch units that month despite selling 3.6M at retail. Not exactly record-breaking. The idea that AC is doing something like five times what the previous confirmed record was for most surplus consoles moved is not reasonable. Just because it had a very good start, one of the best ever, doesn't mean it was able to move 2M surplus consoles on its own.

And I've already dealt with the gender ratio argument in a previous post.

It's unfair to compare Smash's sales during the first month since Smash Bros Ultimate and Brawl released towards the beginning of the month, 7th and 9th respectively in the U.S. Compare that to AC where it released on the 20th, so Ultimate nearly had a 2 week advantage which is huge and still was struggling to surpass AC's first month in sales. Also if we compare the sales of AC during its first few months to smash, AC easily runs away with it WW and in the U.S. Smash Still hasn't reached 22M after nearly 2 years(19 Months), AC did that in 3 months. So to expect something like 5 times more surplus units is not out of the realm of possibilities. As for GTA5, the reason why there wasn't a huge surplus for the PS3 and 360 is because it released 2013, by that time everyone and their mother owned a 7th gen system at that point and Halo 3 was never nearly as big as AC.



ACNH March 2020 NPD Physical should be 1.8-1.9M.

Nintendo confirmed US/EUR/JP digital share to be ~50% in both the FY19 Q4 Q&A (end of Pg. 1) and again in FY20 Q1 Results (end of Pg. 11).  Since we know JP's physical AC sales and ship+digital at both of these times, it is easy to extrapolate that the upper-bound for JP's digital share is 30%.  This puts the target number for US/EUR digital share at >60% (not knowing ROTW).  Obviously Europe could be much higher than US or vice-versa, but easy assumption is to just plug 60% in.

Exp total MAR sales for ACNH in US would be 1800-1900K / 0.40 =  4,500 - 4,750K.  

Exp total AUG sales for ACNH in US would be 179K / 0.40 = 448K.

Obviously this isn't exact, digital share fluctuates market-to-market, month-to-month.  

Super rough guesstimate of ACNH monthly NPD sales

Spoiler!

MAR 4,600K (2 weeks)

APR 1,800K (4 weeks)

MAY 1,400K (4 weeks)

JUN 1,100K (5 weeks)

JUL 650K (4 weeks)

AUG 450K (4 weeks)

Tried to do roughly 35% drops (weekly) after April and targeted Apr-Jun summing to ~90% of March launch.