By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics - [Update] CIA & FBI Report: Russia did things to help get Trump elected

Airaku said:
badgenome said:

I'd like to see some proof of this. They're selective about what they release and when - maybe hypocritically so for a pro-transparency organization - but as far as I know Wikileaks has a 100% accuracy rating, which is something virtually no other media outlet on the planet can claim.

                               
I was debating on not saying anything because I didn't want to open this can of worms, but I already did so here's go. You can take this as you will.

http://Pastebin.com/6hexG6eT was a disturbing revelation by some Anonymous members. Take this as you will, however their claims do line up. I remember the first time the "Spirit Cooking" claims came out before it went mainstream. It really didn't add up the first time and it did indeed come out within a day or two after an Anonymous Pedophile investigation that had Donald J. Trump's name tied to it. Weather engaged pedophilia or money was simply transferred in his name... I don't know. However after this story went out and ties were found, Wikileaks pushed "Spirit Cooking" forward.  A couple months later I guess Spirit Cooking came back and Pizza Gate was born. It's kind of sad that some of the interview footages and stuff used was actually from a movie that came out in 1989 called "Satan's Children" or something like that. So yeah.... Wikileaks actually destroyed their own credibility with a massive hoax. Also use that link to learn a bit about Wikileaks history. It actually explains why Wikileaks seems so different this past couple years than it was 5 years ago.

The other redflag is that ex-Blink 182 singer Tom DeLonge had some e-mail exchanges with John Podesta and they were released in the Wikileaks. Tom went on to say that his e-mails were mostly accurate, but they have been edited and doctored up. He then stated that he has no idea why they did that. My guess is they downplayed it because it could have made Podesta look really good for the common American folk.

I'll also state that there are also a few Clinton e-mails that don't add up or make much sense. Almost counter productive so to speak. However they highly damaged her image. Especially with the conspiracy theory crowd. Toss Rothchild's name in an e-mail and BAM! You got an angry mob. Of course that's just briefly touching on the crazy stuff.

Suspicion is no confirmation, and even then, nothing is more suspect than Clinton destroying thousands of e-mails.



“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).

"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)

Around the Network
LurkerJ said:
bunchanumbers said:

Nope. Trump will talk with anyone with enough power or money. I wouldn't be shocked in the least if all of a sudden there are some luxury Trump hotels opening up in Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

As long as they are too rich we have a problem. Getting them involved in more expensive wars and pushing for clean energy is a good way to limit their toxicity.

They're not going to be doing any of the things you said. They want expensive wars. It raises oil prices. The US is doubling down on fracking, mining, and drilling too. At least according to Trump. They will be privatizing Tribal lands and opening up nature preserves in Alaska. That might be the only thing that would hurt the opec countries. At least for a little while. Eventually our oil reserves will be depleted and then Opec will be fully in control again.

Only with the added benefit of destroying the Natives, ruining their land, killing the nature preserves and national parks, and most likely poisoning the water like the Gulf Coast.



Airaku said:

Well if you don't put much stock in Anonymous, then I have zero idea why you even consider Wikileaks a credible source of information since some of their members were responsible for basically kick starting the thing years ago? Just a curious question.

Because Wikileaks has someone willing to put his name and face out there (and spend the last five years stuck in two small rooms) for it while "Anonymous" is a bunch of kids hiding behind Guy Fawkes masks, cringey slogans, and British accented text to speech generators. There never really was an Anonymous to begin with, and there certainly isn't one anymore.



And the sky is blue!



                
       ---Member of the official Squeezol Fanclub---

Zkuq said:
It would be almost stupid to assume Russia didn't have a hand in the election in some way, if they had a preference for some candidate (and it's well known they had a preference for Trump). How significant, that's another story, but it would be a surprise if Russia didn't at least try something.

Exactly. Russia is corrupt as hell. Of course they tried to influence the elections in their favor.

/thread



Around the Network
poklane said:
No fucking shit.
Again, congrats America. You voted for a Russian puppet. Because of Trump being elected along with the EU getting weaker and weaker I'd seriously shit my pants if I was leaving in Eastern Europe. A Russian invasion into the Baltics can no longer be ruled out.

Haha, don't scare me, I live in Baltics.



LurkerJ said:
Egelo said:

Oh since when was it the russians that flew two airliners into the WTC ???

It wasn't Iraq, for sure.

It happened in 2001 and your president invaded the wrong country as a response. Who pushed for that response? The Saudis, because they saw a good opportunity to get rid of Saddam and they pushed for it.

Whoever your president is, the Saudi will have their claws deep in your politicians. I hope that, for the sake of the planet, Trump is different.

The fuck?



Worst case scenario: we have a cyber threat security issue. Best case scenario the Clintons and the DNC were exposed for who and what they are.



Ljink96 said:
I just don't care anymore.For people saying Hillary got "support" from other nations... THOSE NATIONS WERE NOT OUR FUCKING ENEMIES.

They arnt your enemy yet, but you keep treating them like one they will be



I think most people will think Hillary got exposed and not care