badgenome on 10 December 2016
| Airaku said: Well if you don't put much stock in Anonymous, then I have zero idea why you even consider Wikileaks a credible source of information since some of their members were responsible for basically kick starting the thing years ago? Just a curious question. |
Because Wikileaks has someone willing to put his name and face out there (and spend the last five years stuck in two small rooms) for it while "Anonymous" is a bunch of kids hiding behind Guy Fawkes masks, cringey slogans, and British accented text to speech generators. There never really was an Anonymous to begin with, and there certainly isn't one anymore.
