onionberry said:
funded by Nintendo, just like bloodborne was funded by sony. exactly. third party exclusives are a thing when a company pays for the development, just like the rumor of beyond good and evil 2.
basically the same answer for all your points, the answer is money. |
It's really only an issue for games that can't get funding though to begin with, and those games are likely not going to sell anyway.
I'm sure Microsoft and Sony officials would glad run around the street naked if they could get say an exclusive GTA or COD for just covering the development cost. That's an easy yes.
Most developers understand their franchises have an oppurtunity cost too, even if a console maker is willing to pay for exclusivity, are they also willing to pay for the lost sales you incur from missed sales on competing platforms? That's the bigger issue.
The games that generally end up getting secured for exclusivity are games no publisher is willing to finance on their own, because they're likely going to sell like shit. I loved me some Bayonetta 2, but that game sold like crap (and is heavily overtracked on this site).









