JustBeingReal said:
|
Lol, I dont have any problems to understand english, it's very obvious he is not so certain with his wording and have hard time explaining concept, and fact that people totally different interpreted his words proves that, one are saying this confirmation of hybrid and one are saying that he talking about separate handheld and separate console.
So you saying if they using same arhitecture cost will be 50% down!? Thats not true at all. Everything you wrote is not valid and you dont have not single fact, you make just your assumption that don't sound realistic at all. Home console of power of PS4 and separate handheld together for $299 that will sell with profit with that price, is not realistic at all to expect that.
My words are very clear, you quote my first post where I talk about Wii U and NX 3rd party not about PS4/XB1, also I wrote few post ago about 3rd party sales: "just for record I talking about Wii U and NX, not about NX and PS4 or XB1 for instance". Of Course that NX will not sell even near XB1 numbers of 3rd party games.
No, actually it's given that great new Zelda, that is one most hyped Nintendo games ever, that easily won E3, like launch title for new Nintendo console, will move alone milion's of console. Wii U was mostly bought by hardcore Nintendo fans, and they will most likely bought Zelda on NX. Think about Zelda TP for GC and Wii. Zelda also attracts people that for instance don't like other Nintendo games. Like wrote, Zelda BotW is incompatible much stronger than any game Wii U had in its whole 1st year, and of course that Zelda BotW will not be only strong launch game.
Nintendo dont aiming to compete directly with NX with PS4/XB1 and for 3rd party, they aiming casuals, mobile users who want upgrade, Nintendo fans of course, and to be second console for PS4/XB1 owners, of course that nobody will buy NX or any Nintendo console to play 3rd party games on 1st place.
I stand that Emily from time to time give us some true leaks, SMD didn't have nothing from beginning of year when he lost source, after that he just saying his assumptions and thinking. He talked that NX will be stronger than PS4 and even maybe can be compete with PS4 Pro. Also his article proves that he dont have any info that he is just assuming and giving his opinion. https://arcadegirl64.wordpress.com/2016/10/08/i-asked-youtube-personality-supermetaldave64-why-he-disagrees-with-my-nx-rumors/
Even if infos are from same source (but Eurogamer specifically said they confirmed their info from several different sources), fact that all reliable sources confirmed Eurogamer article, means they are certain in those infos and their own sources. And how no one single relible source did not come out and said Eurogamer article isnt true, instead we got just confirmations from multiple sources.
So what, Tegra can again be treated like industry leading chip. WSJ said "cutting edge technology" not technology with most power, they basilcy talked about modern tehnology, that could be easily be Tegra X2. And offcourse same that WSJ confirmed Eurogamer article, so its obvious thats Nvidia.
Of Course that Morpheus will not sell great because it just another tablet on market with hundred of tablets available and with every day with new one coming out, most of consumers never heard specifically about Morpheus. We are here talking about new dedicated Nintendo console, not just about just onother tablet on very crowded market, you cant compare that at all. Only similarity with NX are detachable controllers, nothing more. Comparing Morpheus tablet with NX is similar like comparing Steam machine with XB1/PS4, even worse example because much more people are aware of Steam machine than Morpheus tablet.
Offcoures that EG could be wrong, but with all confirmations that seems not likely.
Nvidia actually can't say investitor nothing if are under specific NDA (for instance Nintendo asked that they basicly say nothing until they revile NX), and we know that NX NDA is very strong, still not one single official confirmation.