That's also why Nintendo is least likely to take risks.

But they take massive risks with every generation. The risks are in their input devices for their consoles. Wii and Wiimotes were a massive risk. The Wii U gamepad was their safest move, and it was their worst selling console. 

An input device alone does not constitute a massive risk.

The Wii might have seemed like a massive risk, but consider the possibility that the Wii could have flopped. If it did so, Nintendo would probably have a lot less money then they do now, but it wouldn't have sinked the company. After all, the Wii is practically an extension/redesign of the Gamecube. It didn't cost them that much to make, they "never" sold it a loss.

It was new, it was "innovative", but it wasn't risky not at all.

The Gamecube was probably their biggest risk, since it was so unlike its predecessor, and so powerful for its time.

Lol Nintendo's debt is at $103,000... Did Miyamoto just buy a house or something?

They're not really too comparable as Microsoft was unphased by operating the Xbox at a large loss for most of its history. Sony, given the failing nature of most of their business ventures, did need the Playstation to succeed but is such a large company that its impact is still limited.

Nintendo, meanwhile, is hugely dependent on their handhelds, though by playing it safe with affordable-to-produce hardware they've never really seen the kind of nosedive sega experienced.

They're all so different that direct comparisons don't really yield any useful information.

Actually this is a wrong thing, i dont know who falls on Microsoft's PR, that they are selling less, but making more profit with Xbox, than Sony, with Playstation.

Playstation 4, only is manufactured on Brazil, and on China, and you know what this means ?, with more consoles being sold it cost less money to Sony, for make the Consoles and they can get much more profit, is because of that Xbox One, and Playstation 4, are on the same price, is because Sony, made much more Playstation 4, because of that the Playstation 4, get a price drop, they are not selling Playstation 4, at loss, and they would only lose money with Playstation 4, if it were not selling, but is selling all the stock really quick.

So, Playstation 4, being cheaper and more powerful, is giving the same or even more profit per unit than Xbox One, to Microsoft.

the Company's health have nothing to do with the Console Market, if the console is only giving loss the Company will quit the console market, even if have the Apple's level of profits, so what is more important for the gaming market ?, Sony, not selling movies, or Cellphones, but selling Consoles, or Microsoft, selling Microsoft Visual Studios, Windows, but not selling consoles ?.

This Thread makes no sense, i think that is a Counter-Thread, because someone did not liked Uncharted Collection, selling more than Halo 5, so who made this Thread, please tell for me what have to do Sony, or Microsoft, selling less icecream, but more Sugar, what this have to do with the console caming ?, did you want to say that Despite Playstation 4's value being more than 8 Billions per year to Sony, and Xbox One, being 1 Billion per year to Microsoft (just a example), you want to say that if i did not go and see Spiderman's movie, Sony, will stop of making Playstation ?, and even if Xbox, give Eternal loss for Microsoft, they will continue to make Xbox ?, even when they clearly are changing to PC ?, less than 1/6 of Sony's revenue came from Gaming, for Microsoft, even less, so what is the point of making this ?.

Many people may think that, but they are very few in the end. But yes Nintendo is still safe (but was in a downward motion that still need a good correction to show strong numbers); but if NX sells less than 3DS+WiiU that will be dangerous. I don't think any of your target entered the thread... the only comments we saw that weren't already knowing this situation was from one guy that though Sony's TVs and Mobile generated a lot of profits.

Completely forgot Sony has a bank too... 

From a financial POV, Nintendo is a very smartly run "little" (employee size) company that punches far above its weight.

Wouldn't it be more accurate to compare Microsoft and Sony's game division to Nintendo?

The irony of their most profitable service being financial services while they were in deep shit on financial side.

You're like the 10 person to say that, there is no accurate number for this part (we would have only revenue and profits, but assets and liabilities would need a big research or baseless assumptions... none would help us now)