spurgeonryan said:
|
55% of 145 isn't 100...
Can TFA make it to a Billion domestically? | |||
Yes, explain below | 35 | 31.53% | |
Maybe, but just barely | 30 | 27.03% | |
No | 38 | 34.23% | |
other post below | 0 | 0% | |
see results | 8 | 7.21% | |
Total: | 111 |
spurgeonryan said:
|
55% of 145 isn't 100...
spurgeonryan said: I would like to point out that TFA has done these feats on a much smaller budget compared to the others! Titanic did it with 200 million, but that was huge for that time! The Avengers, Jurassic World, and Age of Ultron! Then Avatar.....425 million budget! TFA did it with 200 million. Sure we can argue they through in nostalgia to tug at our heartstrings, technology is easier to manager these days, Titanic did not really have any nostalgia in it and neither did Avatar, but it is still impressive!
|
Avatar's production budget was 237 million.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most_expensive_films
spurgeonryan said:
What is it then?
edit....ahhh yes.....should I have said 185 approx instead? |
Yes, that's right.
A $100M movie needs $185 to break even? More like $250M.
Lawlight said: A $100M movie needs $185 to break even? More like $250M. |
$250M is a bit high, especially if we are talking domestic gross only. People tend to forget about DVD/Blu-ray sales and the fact that the $100M could include marketing costs as well.
spurgeonryan said:
Well 100 million would technically do it, but they only get 55 percent back from ticket sales. Now we are talking juat breaking even with no marketing included. Once you add that in things get more expensive. |
Depending on the part of the world, its higher than 55%, which is why in the UK, cinema chains often increased ticket prices on big movies so they get a bigger piece of the pie. UK gross to the studio is most likely closer to 70%.
That 50% myth is ancient news. Its not like that anymore.
foodfather said:
Depending on the part of the world, its higher than 55%, which is why in the UK, cinema chains often increased ticket prices on big movies so they get a bigger piece of the pie. UK gross to the studio is most likely closer to 70%. That 50% myth is ancient news. Its not like that anymore. |
The 40% I had used before he says higher numbers comes from world wide, full runs. Studios do get more in some places, and get higher percentage in the early weeks, but as the weeks go by the theaters get more and more. I read an article a few years back that cited regal theaters kept 48.2% in 2011. That would leave 51.8 for the studios and distributes. While that it's one theater chain they are large and had made 1.8 billion I in total ticket sales that year.
And actually studios used to get much more and held far more power but got busted in an antitrust case in 1948
It may pass Titanic but not Avatar. Worldwide can give it $1.3bil whiles the American market at best would give $750mil
Check these hilarious commentsFunny Comments and replies
Worldwide will be difficult, because of Avatar's outrageous international sales. Domestic is probably already a done deal. Avatar will be toast by the start of next week. It's going over a billion there. Let's say 1.1b. Since China cracks up the international number a little let's say 1.2b for a total of 2.3b. Put that down as a prediction, it'll beat Titanic.
I would love to see it go all the way to at least 2.8b, because with all due respect, I feel like Avatar is just a bad Pocahontas knock-off and totally undeserving of the #1 position, but who am I?
foodfather said:
Depending on the part of the world, its higher than 55%, which is why in the UK, cinema chains often increased ticket prices on big movies so they get a bigger piece of the pie. UK gross to the studio is most likely closer to 70%. That 50% myth is ancient news. Its not like that anymore. |
Well in China they get less then 50% of the box office. Also movies usually get a higher percentage the first couple of days of a movies release.