This thread is not about respectfully disagreeing with him. It's mockery toward a dying person, just read the thread title and have some decency ffs.

You tell me I'm being one sided and biased and yet I don't see you doing this all the time for when the opposite happens, like seriously to call me one sided and biased and you are somehow completely unbiased, how when all humans are biased in general.

Can I just ask, where are you every time someone bashes PC gaming?, legit question.

Laughing at bias is still laughing at the person in general at the end of the day, his bias isn't some seperate external self aware life form that you can just yank away at will and laugh at seperately, it's coming from him as a person either way.

Let me break it down for you.

Steak = great game.

Steak cooked by a bad chef over a campfire = great game held back by the hardware. Like Ultima VI on SNES or Red Alert on the PS1.

Chicken somewhere else = a different game on PC.

Chef:  person who prepares food for people to eat

The PS4 is not the chef.

Furthermore, I'm allowed to enjoy a terrible analogy. 

Which implies games would be always better on PC. You know, like Resident Evil 4, Arkham Knight or Metal Gear Solid 2 - a Hideo Kojima game.

It's just silly to come to any conclusions just now. I don't think the graphics matter that much anyway. Maybe Kojima decided to make an oldschool 2D game? Who knows? Like I said, we'll have to wait and see. There's no point in complaining right away over literally nothing. 

Can I just point out the bolded parts for just a moment. I am aware you chose 3 different games that you no doubt know of the "port" quality of (notice I said port and not made on instead) and used as a counter argument despite the fact that all 3 used different teams, one of which was a console based 12 man dev team and the other two being different teams in general from their originals, the difference there is that you chose bad examples to back up your counterpoint as to why games don't run better on PC (which only suggests you believbe they run better on consoles instead and thus we trek into the muddy waters of us vs them which we really should be staying away from).

I know you don't think visuals don't matter as much, I don't mind for some games but I will definitely praise nice looking visuals when they are presented, despite MGSV being an incomplete and repetitive game it did look the part for a HK game, same with Battlefront despite it's lacking content and Witcher 3 (all 3 AAA's which work really well on PC and the upgrades did show for it in terms of MGSV V as an example).

There isn't much to complain about a game that doesn't exist for sure but TB is taking issue with how the deal will affect said games in the future, I mean really all Kojima has done at the end of the day was to play musical chairs where he goes from one seat to another rather than neither and still doing what he wants, though Sony will give him some assistance, there is no guarantee that Sony will allow him to spread his work to multiple systems and that's where some can start taking issue with and I can see that being a valid complaint. I mean the Mona Lisa is still at it's original place of showing but it's also had multiple copies created that were spread around the world rather than being confided to just the one museum.

1. Where do you see that? I generally don't post anything when these sorts of things happen on either side unlike you unless something out of the ordinary is happening like this.

2. You are being completely biased here and trying to turn something he said into something completely different.

3. I don't really see any PC bashing here on the forums at all and don't post in them or console bashing unless it's a special circumstance like this one. Instead I do see you in multiple threads everyday posting the same things over and over again always trying to start arguments with people if they didn't say something you liked(usually if a game is console exclusive or only announced for consoles).

4. Again you're trying to make it sound like everyone who disagrees and laughs at his ridiculous statements is laughing at the person who has cancer and not what he says.

Why do you try to explain what a chef is to me? It wouldn't be an analogy if chef actually meant chef.

And there is nothing wrong with the analogy either. I got it immediately.

Arent we all

How long can I continue this painful analogy you might ask? Don't test me, the puns are next

— TotalBiscuit (@Totalbiscuit) December 16, 2015

Seriously, even he admits it's a bad analogy....

Added some more responses to the original post.