vivster said:
Lay off a bit dude. At the moment he made these posts he didn't know that the game would come to PC, no one did. It's not a long shot to conclude that if someone gets financed by Sony that the game will be Playstation exclusive. I thought so as well when I first heard the news. He's not pushing any agenda and he certainly will not hide facts intentionally. He doesn't need to lie to his audience, which is in the millions already. If anything he's one of the biggest advocates of ethical journalism and integrity. And what he said is still true, all games on consoles, be it exclusive or 3rd party are way behind their potential. Better performance and sharper images are objectively better in any scenario. |
And why should anyone be anoyed by a game being financed by a company be exclusive to that platform? Unless he is able to provide financing to the game his rage amount to zero use. And if he want to lash his fury without enough information that is also on his back so no one can complain of him getting smacked when he jumped the gun.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
