I voted up Lost Odyssey, Tales of Vesperia and Blue Dragon. I'll upvote the others for you later.

30% is just the standard cut platform holders take on all game sales on there stores, i know this from working in the industry sorry i cant link you to any official documents, i obviously havent dealt with BC games for XBO yet, but there is no reason the cut would be any differnt. It never has been for anything else. 

You ask me for answers to your question, sorry i cant link to a report the knowledge comes from using the service and being part of the community and giving feedback on why so few games ever got released and why we had to wait sooo long for games like resident evil 2 and 3 in europe. 

But then you give statements like "Btw, with PSOne Classics the money went to Sony first. Here no money goes to MS," Which is completly false with no evidence, 

This was meant like "no extra money". All I was saying the whole time is that this is not something that is totally new for publishers, there is no new platform or anything. It's the same platform like it is today, no differences. They just have to allow the games to be also played via emulation on Xbone which is in the end a 360.

BC is only good if its on a Sony console, otherwise its irrelevant.

Here's one: but there will be others. I am working on it.

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=196020&page=1#4

Isn't it a more limited BC than on any other console?

Depends? It is the first console that has to deal with bc for a console which was full of drm and features downloadable and dics-titles and where many before said it was technically impossible to do. Limited in a technical way? Perhaps, right now the compatible games work flawless. Limited in a license way? Already mentioned. Limited currently? Like they announced, only for a few titles and only for preview members. Didn't even launch officially.

Better than nothing, I guess.  The 360 to Xbox (2001) BC was pretty limited but still had a robust list of games.  Since I didn't have an original Xbox, I was able to go back and buy a lot of games that I wanted but missed.  I own a metric fuckton of 360 games so hopefully, the XB1 list grows pretty rapidly.  Haven't had a chance to try it for myself since Xbox Live was down for me, yesterday.

Of course, the PS2, PS3, Wii/Wii U method would be much preferred (especially since the Playstation BC enhanced the games, graphically!) but considering it's a feature that was supposed to be impossible, I'm happy to have it in any form.  I have two working 360s.  One is in my living room and one is in my game room--with the Wii U, PS3, PS4, and XB1.  I would LOVE to be able to move the 360 to one of my bedrooms just so I could use Netflix, WWE Network, Hulu, etc.

I don't think it would be. It's a nice feature and I would love to have it on PS4 too, but it doesn't change a lot of things. Let's see some cases:

- Genesis had an add-on that allowed to play SMS games. Almost nobody had it.

- The PS3 and 360 had BC. However, almost everyone had a PS2 while nobody had an OG Xbox. So it should be an advantage for Sony, allowing people to play their PS2 games (we even had a big PS2 title, GOW 2, releasing after the PS3). This didn't saved Sony from getting soundly beaten.

- The Slim PS3 didn't had BC. Its launch with a better price point, even without BC, improved a lot PS3 sales performance.

So I think that what really makes difference for a consoles is price and games. People don't want to buy new consoles to play PS360 games, they want to play new gen games. I've used BC very rarely during the years. I played Gran Turismo 2 once on my PS2 just to see if it worked. On Vita, I used it to play half an hour of Monster Hunter and maybe one hour of GTA for the PSP. In both cases, it was because I got the games for free on PS+, but didn't played a lot yet.

It's a cool feature, of course. But it won't move a lot of units. We can say the same for Sony's conference. Shenmue 3 won't move units. Dreams, maybe. But the real deal for mainstream was UC4, Battlefront and the CoD deal.

PS3 wasn't soundly beaten, ever.  People just acted like it was because Sony said they would overtake 360 within a year and move on.  Truthfully, the PS3 outsold the 360 almost every year except one since the day it launched, even when it cost $100-$200 more.  Did people not care about BC or did the price point hurt them?  It's not that simple.

*edit*  Also, I'm a PSP/Vita and DS/3DS owner.  I probably bought as many PSP games for Vita as I did Vita games for Vita since launch day!  And I'm still buying DS games for 3DS.  My most played 3DS game (according to the Activity Feed) is Advance Wars Dual Strike!!