Bloodborne does have an autosave feature...

Ninja Blade was a total piece.

FentonCrackshell said: JinxRake said: FentonCrackshell said: JinxRake said: Sigh. Here you go. 2043596970_1/Focus-of-Attention-Women-s-Fashion-Dress-font-b-Bag-b-font-Charming-Shoulder-font-b.jpg" border="0"> Enjoy this little bag of attention and savor your moment of relevance. Lemme guess: You like the game and your feelings are hurt that someone else doesn't?  Off by a very long shot, but sure, if that's what gets you feeling better about yourself.  You played a game that you took no effort to adapt to or to understand, and call it terrible because it won't hold your hand or whisper what a good little boy you are as it tucks you in at night. This is not commentary on the value of the game, on its quality - or even lack of - or anything partaining to the game. This is simply a whine thread that screams "PAY ATTENTION TO ME BECAUSE I DON'T LIKE SOMETHING POPULAR FOR POORLY EXPLAINED REASONS!". Enjoy the Witcher 3 since it's more your speed then. Wow, a message board Mercenary. You're 1 in a million. So, I guess there aren't any games you don't like? I mean, every game has its detractors. Why are fans of these games so upset that some people may feel differently? Well, not all fans. Seems you're the only one who's butthurt over it.

I think he's already stated that he's not so much upset with the opinion as he is with the path to that conclusion. You made no attempt and decided you didn't like it from the start. You gave it no chance and took to the Web to bash it. 

Hardly a moot point that someone can dislike a game that doesn't make use of a readily available feature in a way they like.

Also, my experience with this series is that they make almost nothing readily apparent.  That is also, from what I gather by the staunch defenders, part of it's appeal.

This is seriously, seriously sad. I don't understand how any Witcher game is better than any Souls game (I have only played TW2 and thought it was super mediocre). Awful combat, terrible sense of direction, terrible map system, terrible and cheesy voice acting and dialogue, unnecessary endless loot, boring monster design, poor weapon variety, awful map system, cannot even walk off ledges---you need to do a button prompt. TW3 looks just as clunky.

Makes me happy to be able to persevere and finish and appreciate all of the souls games. What is wrong with a little bit of perseverance or desire to overcome challenges---instead Souls games are called terrible and easy crap like Assassin's Creed and The Witcher and DA: I are praised. 

Would most people here would also prefer Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest to FF6 or FF7, since that game is much simpler and has no challenge?

Actually a lot of people can accept that others have different opinions even about things they like or things they are very interested in. But most people react if you directly attack something they like. So there might be a difference.

I disagree with pretty much everything you said, but the atmosphere part of Dark Souls II was something I felt needed a rebuttal. I simply don't believe this is right at all, and if one actually takes the time to digest what's happening in that universe it's actually something quite special. Now one can argue the level design of II wasn't as great as the first, which may be fair, but the sheer amount of variety and straight up attention to detail is awe inducing to a person like me.

Ahhh... See what you did there? You took a critically acclaimed game and listed the things that you think aren't good about it. I may have been hyperbolic with the "terrible" connotation but what's the difference between what I did and what you did? 

this thread makes me think Witcher 3 might be pretty bad if it's liked by people that praise the soulless mmo simulator that is Dragon Age:Inquisition

I loved DA:I. (Plat)
I am enjoying Witcher 3.
Bloodborne is a better game than both. (Plat, and then played another 70 hours)
I tried playing Dark Souls 2 after Bloodborne and just could not do it, its such a step back.