By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming - Konami Should make PES Playstation Exclusive

It will benefit Konami but not Sony, because this coming free with a PS4 will eat into Fifa's sales, something which Sony does not want. They make more money sold from a single non-bundled Fifa copy compared to a single bundled copy from PES, so this will not benefit Sony, only Konami.



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Around the Network

Also:

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/pro-evolution-soccer-2015

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/fifa-15

PES isn't better now, they are equal.



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

Mr Puggsly said:

Here we go, you're turning this into a console war discussion.

MS has arguably better 1st party games than PS4 at the moment. MS doesn't have anything to combat Uncharted 4, while Sony doesn't have anything at par with Halo 5. Neither company has the best games in all genres.

EA knew Titanfall was going lose out on millions of sales by being exclusive to Xbox regardless if they thought it was going to sell better on Xbox.

Getting PES as an exclusive isn't going to benefit Sony much since its not a desired by Xbox owners. Simple as that.

i'm merely answering the replies put forward to me. no need for the defensive post. 

MS arguable has better exclusives but they're paying money to make multiplatform 3rd party titles exclusive instead of developing their own. Case in point Tomb Raider. Sony go out and create uncharted. MS go and buy a multi game for timed exclusiveness. 

Obviously EA knew that but the price paid was about a half to a 3rd of what it would of been if they knew what a monster the PS4 would be. 

It's not going to benefit Sony much, I never said that but if done the way I said it can benefit both parties more than the current situation is. Have you not read all my posts and the OP? If so you should have picked that up. 



TheSpindler said:
Kerotan said:
TheSpindler said


Sony doesn't need to counter anything though.  And if they do, they can offer a PES bundle, rather than going for an exclusive.  Besides, they're already doing phenomenally well in Europe, so they wouldn't need something like that in the first place.  Especially when more than likely PES will sell more on their platforms anyway(main markets for PES is EU and JA, Son'ys typically strongest markets).

I'm not sure limiting your audience would be a 'win' for Konami, and if it would be worth it.

"And SOny get a nice exclusive because PES is better than Fifa."

Well that is just your opinion though.  

I could see the bundle thing happening, but really, what's the point?  That FIFA XboxOne bundle exists because MS needs a good foothold in Europe and they have a strong relationship with EA atm trying to gain an upperhand on Sony.  Sony is already at the top, with those multiplat games selling best on PS4 anyway.




the fifa bundle exists because MS payed a lot of money for it plus exclusive advertising. Sony didn't need to do anything because they dominate the EU and ROW where FIfa sells most. 

I'm just saying that a PES deal could work out for both and not cost either side. As pointed out the Xbox PES sales are so miserably low that it would be easy for a PS4 PES bundle to morew than make up the lost Xbox sales.

And the thing that will benefit SOny is getting it more sales with a bundle will give PES a much needed chance to get back into the mainstream. Right now it's a better game than Fifa so it's a good exclusive to have. 


Well they paid alot of money of course, but thee reason why it existed is bacause of what I stated, that MS saw FIFA as a way of gaining ground in Europe.  And a way for EA to cut some costs and likely some larger deal between MS and EA.

Yeah, I'm still not seeing the point of an exclusive.  A bundle sure, but I still don't see the benefit fo an exclusive deal to Sony, and any benefits to Konami are up in the air, and I don't see them recouping the loss of multiplat with an exclusive deal.  .

"And the thing that will benefit SOny is getting it more sales with a bundle will give PES a much needed chance to get back into the mainstream."

Sony doesn't need that, like at all.  And that 'more sales' thing is a maybe.  PES sells more on Sony platforms, they don't need to seek out deals, when there is a much bigger franchise that wells very well on their platforms already.  Hell, didn't they make like a PS2 FIFA game last year or something?

When it comes to FIFA, Playstation brands are already king, and it's not like FIFA will be abandoning or selling less on Sony's platform in the near future either.  Besides, I'm not too sure EA will be too happy with Sony doing that maybe.


What right would ea have to be pissed if they released exclusive content and bundle on X1 even knowing it is the worst seller plus a lot of exclusives were negotiated with MS. Do you think ea or sony would lose more if they skip a fifa from sony? I bet ea would burn a lot reasoning it by being pissed of exclusive pes and bundle than sony for not securing fifa, besides PR nightmare.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."

Kerotan said:
Mr Puggsly said:

Here we go, you're turning this into a console war discussion.

MS has arguably better 1st party games than PS4 at the moment. MS doesn't have anything to combat Uncharted 4, while Sony doesn't have anything at par with Halo 5. Neither company has the best games in all genres.

EA knew Titanfall was going lose out on millions of sales by being exclusive to Xbox regardless if they thought it was going to sell better on Xbox.

Getting PES as an exclusive isn't going to benefit Sony much since its not a desired by Xbox owners. Simple as that.

i'm merely answering the replies put forward to me. no need for the defensive post. 

MS arguable has better exclusives but they're paying money to make multiplatform 3rd party titles exclusive instead of developing their own. Case in point Tomb Raider. Sony go out and create uncharted. MS go and buy a multi game for timed exclusiveness. 

Obviously EA knew that but the price paid was about a half to a 3rd of what it would of been if they knew what a monster the PS4 would be. 

It's not going to benefit Sony much, I never said that but if done the way I said it can benefit both parties more than the current situation is. Have you not read all my posts and the OP? If so you should have picked that up. 

No, I was explaining the 3rd party games that companies seek out for exclusivity are often desired by consumers of a competiting platform. Bayonetta 2 is a good example of that as well.

You somehow came to conclusion MS does that because their 1st party is weak, that's a ridiculous response. Their 1st party is strong and they can afford to do some moneyhatting, like Sony did when they had more money.

I think Titanfall was a bad move by EA. Not just because PS4 is popular, but because that game should have been made to as big of audience as possible. Even Playstation exclusivity would have been a bad move. I see Playstation fans being bitter about not getting Titanfall and try to spin it as a bad game.

If the PES series continues to grow in quality the situation for Konami will get better without help from Sony. Or maybe MS should moneyhat PES if the series grows in popularity. They can afford it.



Recently Completed
River City: Rival Showdown
for 3DS (3/5) - River City: Tokyo Rumble for 3DS (4/5) - Zelda: BotW for Wii U (5/5) - Zelda: BotW for Switch (5/5) - Zelda: Link's Awakening for Switch (4/5) - Rage 2 for X1X (4/5) - Rage for 360 (3/5) - Streets of Rage 4 for X1/PC (4/5) - Gears 5 for X1X (5/5) - Mortal Kombat 11 for X1X (5/5) - Doom 64 for N64 (emulator) (3/5) - Crackdown 3 for X1S/X1X (4/5) - Infinity Blade III - for iPad 4 (3/5) - Infinity Blade II - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Infinity Blade - for iPad 4 (4/5) - Wolfenstein: The Old Blood for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Origins for X1 (3/5) - Uncharted: Lost Legacy for PS4 (4/5) - EA UFC 3 for X1 (4/5) - Doom for X1 (4/5) - Titanfall 2 for X1 (4/5) - Super Mario 3D World for Wii U (4/5) - South Park: The Stick of Truth for X1 BC (4/5) - Call of Duty: WWII for X1 (4/5) -Wolfenstein II for X1 - (4/5) - Dead or Alive: Dimensions for 3DS (4/5) - Marvel vs Capcom: Infinite for X1 (3/5) - Halo Wars 2 for X1/PC (4/5) - Halo Wars: DE for X1 (4/5) - Tekken 7 for X1 (4/5) - Injustice 2 for X1 (4/5) - Yakuza 5 for PS3 (3/5) - Battlefield 1 (Campaign) for X1 (3/5) - Assassin's Creed: Syndicate for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: Infinite Warfare for X1 (4/5) - Call of Duty: MW Remastered for X1 (4/5) - Donkey Kong Country Returns for 3DS (4/5) - Forza Horizon 3 for X1 (5/5)

Around the Network
Kerotan said:

this thread is not based on how SO was acquired so that's irrelevant to the points behind my suggestion in this thread. 

ANd it's not flawed the way you are trying to say it is because Sony was getting SO unless they demanded ownership of the IP. Likewise if they demanded ownership of PES they wouldn't get it. It's the same thing. 

You're the one who brought up Sunset to try and counter my point. I am merely explaining to you why it's a flawed comparison.

I really can't explain it any simpler. If Sony doesn't try and entice Konami to make a PES bundle, they are getting the game anyway. If MS did not try and entice Insomniac, they were not going to get Sunset. If Sony doesn't make a deal with Konami, then Konami misses out on revenue from the Xbox brand.

So again, why would Sony care to spend resources on a game you readily admit they are going to get anyway, and will sell many more copies than Xbox will anyway? There's no reason for Sony to make the deal. You could argue there is reason Konami would, but it would still be a weak argument imho. PES is finally on the rebound and is a small franchise. They need as many people buying the game as they can get. You know what a PS exclusive status would make them? A permanent soccer second fiddle to FIFA.



brute said:
Also:

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/pro-evolution-soccer-2015

http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/fifa-15

PES isn't better now, they are equal.

PES is better this year for gameplay. Fifa for things like the licenses and presentation. 



Mr Puggsly said:

No, I was explaining the 3rd party games that companies seek out for exclusivity are often desired by consumers of a competiting platform. Bayonetta 2 is a good example of that as well.

You somehow came to conclusion MS does that because their 1st party is weak, that's a ridiculous response. Their 1st party is strong and they can afford to do some moneyhatting, like Sony did when they had more money.

I think Titanfall was a bad move by EA. Not just because PS4 is popular, but because that game should have been made to as big of audience as possible. Even Playstation exclusivity would have been a bad move. I see Playstation fans being bitter about not getting Titanfall and try to spin it as a bad game.

If the PES series continues to grow in quality the situation for Konami will get better without help from Sony. Or maybe MS should moneyhat PES if the series grows in popularity. They can afford it.

Just no. MS first party is week. For all the money they have, they still need to reply on moneyhatting 3rd party games to make a decent exclusive list. 

Sony and Nintendo don't need to do such things although will occasionally buy 3rd part exclusives. 

Titanfall has a lot of potential but it was half a game released at full price. IW prob had production issues (think they had a small team). But the sequal has an awful lot to improve on. Agreed about it being exclusive for either platform, ultimitely that's going to damage it going forward. 

Pes has been improving but the sales keep getting worse. Fifa's grip is getting stonger by the year. It's almost impossible for them to get back but making the better game every year would help. 

Lastly if MS moneyhatted PES that would be the end of the series. They bundled it heavily one year and it's sales were still way less than it's PS counter part. If it went exclusive now for xbox it's lights out. I find it funny how you suggest that for MS but you don't think going with Sony where it sells 90% of it's sales would be a better idea. 

PES PS4 vs X1 is 13 -1. Just think about that. 



I understand the licensing argument, but anyone who think that exclusivity wouldn't make up for the tiny amount of lost sales, you don't understand the appeal that exclusive games have.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

outlawauron said:
I understand the licensing argument, but anyone who think that exclusivity wouldn't make up for the tiny amount of lost sales, you don't understand the appeal that exclusive games have.


Yes, but it wouldn't benefit Sony, only Konami.



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"