By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Halo: MCC review thread! UPDATE: Reviews incoming - 87 metascore so far

kowenicki said:
88 after 20. Still one of the best scores this gen and something not many games I have seen coming in the next six months will achieve.

Could sneak uo to 89 or 90

Dont see it going down by the end as I think reviewers that have taken their time are mre likely to give a psiitive review.

I don't know why people always forget the bad reviews come at the end

http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-4/critic-reviews?dist=negative



Around the Network

Did not top 90 . No buy for me because I have played them all and own most of them already.



Reviews are having a good effect on sales anyway. MCC is up to #3 on US Amazon..ahead of 2 PS gift cards. First time I've ever seen a non-discounted game ahead of the PS gift cards. Not even CoD could do it. This is gonna be huge



Hardcore Gamer 100

"This is the definitive first-person shooter experience, a no-brainer purchase for the vast majority of gamers, and the first true system-seller of the new console generation."

Oh that's not a fanboy writing right there, oh no sir, no. He even mentioned the sales, what's that got to do with a review? Very trustworthy review. Not saying the game can't very well deserve a 100, but c'mon, don't be so obvious.


PolygonNov 7, 2014
95
"Sets a bar that other remasters and collections will have difficulty reaching, much less topping. For players new to Halo, who have missed any of the included games, it is a stunning introduction to one of the most beloved series in video games. For Halo fans, it's a package that shows almost as much respect and affection for the Master Chief as they do."

By Arthur Gies. This guy is definitely on MS payroll. Seriously. It's so obvious by everything he writes. Sets a bar so high it will be difficult to top? Then why, oh why, we can easily read other less moneyhatted opinions saying something like the following....

AusGamersNov 7, 2014
80
"Despite an unhealthy smattering of technical concerns, Halo: The Master Chief Collection really is an essential purchase for fans of the series, whether they’re in it for the campaigns, the multiplayer, or the best of both worlds."


"Unhealthy smattering of technical concerns" Let's say the guy exaggerated a bit, maybe, it still doesn't sound to me he would write about this if there wasn't at least some glaring and evident technical flaws. How is that even close to being the new "benchmark" as Gies calls it? C'mon, don't be so obvious, take your money man, we already know you're deep into their pockets, but don't insult our intelligence like that.

Permabanned,

-Mr Khan



kowenicki said:
ethomaz said:
kowenicki said:
88 after 20. Still one of the best scores this gen and something not many games I have seen coming in the next six months will achieve.

Could sneak uo to 89 or 90

Dont see it going down by the end as I think reviewers that have taken their time are mre likely to give a psiitive review.

I don't know why people always forget the bad reviews come at the end

http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-360/halo-4/critic-reviews?dist=negative

Thats not a review.  Its a steaming pile of horse shit.

This games reviews will improve over time. 

I really think this guy spends hours a day digging up sh-t on MS. Nope that is not negative enough, I must continue, I'm assuming it's his side job.



Around the Network
mutantclown said:

Hardcore Gamer 100

"This is the definitive first-person shooter experience, a no-brainer purchase for the vast majority of gamers, and the first true system-seller of the new console generation."

Oh that's not a fanboy writing right there, oh no sir, no. He even mentioned the sales, what's that got to do with a review? Very trustworthy review. Not saying the game can't very well deserve a 100, but c'mon, don't be so obvious.


PolygonNov 7, 2014
95
"Sets a bar that other remasters and collections will have difficulty reaching, much less topping. For players new to Halo, who have missed any of the included games, it is a stunning introduction to one of the most beloved series in video games. For Halo fans, it's a package that shows almost as much respect and affection for the Master Chief as they do."

By Arthur Gies. This guy is definitely on MS payroll. Seriously. It's so obvious by everything he writes. Sets a bar so high it will be difficult to top? Then why, oh why, we can easily read other less moneyhatted opinions saying something like the following....

AusGamersNov 7, 2014
80
"Despite an unhealthy smattering of technical concerns, Halo: The Master Chief Collection really is an essential purchase for fans of the series, whether they’re in it for the campaigns, the multiplayer, or the best of both worlds."


"Unhealthy smattering of technical concerns" Let's say the guy exaggerated a bit, maybe, it still doesn't sound to me he would write about this if there wasn't at least some glaring and evident technical flaws. How is that even close to being the new "benchmark" as Gies calls it? C'mon, don't be so obvious, take your money man, we already know you're deep into their pockets, but don't insult our intelligence like that.


so just because an other reviewer had an other opinion the guy with the higher score god bought??

off course only for ms games



mutantclown said:

Hardcore Gamer 100

"This is the definitive first-person shooter experience, a no-brainer purchase for the vast majority of gamers, and the first true system-seller of the new console generation."

Oh that's not a fanboy writing right there, oh no sir, no. He even mentioned the sales, what's that got to do with a review? Very trustworthy review. Not saying the game can't very well deserve a 100, but c'mon, don't be so obvious.


PolygonNov 7, 2014
95
"Sets a bar that other remasters and collections will have difficulty reaching, much less topping. For players new to Halo, who have missed any of the included games, it is a stunning introduction to one of the most beloved series in video games. For Halo fans, it's a package that shows almost as much respect and affection for the Master Chief as they do."

By Arthur Gies. This guy is definitely on MS payroll. Seriously. It's so obvious by everything he writes. Sets a bar so high it will be difficult to top? Then why, oh why, we can easily read other less moneyhatted opinions saying something like the following....

AusGamersNov 7, 2014
80
"Despite an unhealthy smattering of technical concerns, Halo: The Master Chief Collection really is an essential purchase for fans of the series, whether they’re in it for the campaigns, the multiplayer, or the best of both worlds."


"Unhealthy smattering of technical concerns" Let's say the guy exaggerated a bit, maybe, it still doesn't sound to me he would write about this if there wasn't at least some glaring and evident technical flaws. How is that even close to being the new "benchmark" as Gies calls it? C'mon, don't be so obvious, take your money man, we already know you're deep into their pockets, but don't insult our intelligence like that.


For the first remark you made, I'm not really sure what you are getting at. All he is saying is that it is such a good game that it is destined to be a top system seller. What the fuck is wrong with that?

P.S. And you're not allowed to use the f-word on this site.



I bet the Wii U would sell more than 15M LTD by the end of 2015. He bet it would sell less. I lost.

DJEVOLVE said:

I really think this guy spends hours a day digging up sh-t on MS. Nope that is not negative enough, I must continue, I'm assuming it's his side job.

I don't think his hate is related to MS at all.

http://www.metacritic.com/game/pc/titanfall/critic-reviews?dist=positive
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/playstation-all-stars-battle-royale/critic-reviews?dist=negative
http://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-3/journey/critic-reviews?dist=negative



ethomaz said:


He is a joke that shouldnt be on metacritic at all. And i personally believe you shouldnt share his links as his reviews are primarily for clickbait in the first place.  What Im saying is dont promote him by sending out links.  Ignore him completely.  He is one of the many reasons you shouldnt take metacritic as an all defining number





       

kowenicki said:

I dont think he was talking about him.

Is he talking about me?

But my comment wasn't a dig at MS... it was a dig at the review site lol.

Or am I missing someting?