Just because you "claim" to own both systems doesn't mean your either unbiased or credible. So why would I listen to anyone in this thread who is ignoring the facts. Why should I believe anyone's opinion of Ryse till I've seen it myself. All I know is that is technically inferior to the PS4's offerings and its made by Crytek. 

All I know is that it is graphically superior to the PS4's offerings and its made my Crytek. Thats all that matters.

In your subjective opinion, which is worthless to me. You can't argue that it looks better than Infamous or even 3D land, because its impossible for you to prove subjectivity. But Objectively it has lower frame rate and resolution then both of those games, so opinion does not matter. Technical specs are indisputable, as an alleged pc gamer this much should be obvious to you.

Nobody cares about what you think or belive. If you want to belive that the world is flat then go for it, I will not try to stop you.

T

Moderated,

-Mr Khan

Because the suggestion is , to be frank, stupid. The hardware is set. There is nothing will change that. The similarity of the hardware makes things worse for the XB1. In past generations each console had a unique architecture with it's own strengths and weakeness. This gave developers multiple ways to achieve the same end result. In this generation that isn't case. The XB1 powered by an inferior version of the PS4's APU and is saddled with slower memory. Nothing will change that. People just need to accept this and move on already. It's software that ultimately matters anyway.

Well then its a good thing I never stated what I personally think or believe then. Regardless, facts are facts and just because you post it on an internet forum it does not mean that it will magically change.  Perhaps if I was buying you a present or something it would be relevant that you like Ryse over Infamous. Irronically, Ryse would look better if it was on PS4 or PC exclusively but I doubt you would want it any more, since it would look worse at 1080p just like 

Also, you should take care to follow your own advice.

I'm with you on this. These conversation topics got old a while ago. The PS4 is more capable. Big deal.

Now, can we concentrate on the quality of the games, instead of which console has the bigger peen? -__-

I was just reading this article showing the complete failure of the xbox one to pull off Titanfall to a decent standard;

http://www.eurogamer.net/articles/digitalfoundry-2014-titanfall-next-gen-face-off

Then you read about how they've purposely messed up the PC version with a stupid uncompressed audio install. Microsoft have probably got the developers messing up the 360 version too so it doesn't compare well with the xbox one version (hence the delay).

Looking at metacritic the commercial reviews are completely out of sync with the user reviews;

http://www.metacritic.com/game/xbox-one/titanfall

The viewpoint that the xbox one is powerful hardware comparable to ps4 is not realistic. The gpu, eSRAM bottleneck and slow external memory is clearly causing big issues.

Microsoft could have easily put a small pool of GDDR5 memory in the xbone one like 256MB and restored the APU performance to a comparable level to PS4. It's a cheap compromised design.

Titanfall would have been a much better game on ps4. Possibly 900p without the horrific frame rate drops or screen tearing.

Not even 3rd party this gen. It will be like last gen. In some ways. Everytime a360 game looked better than a PS3 game the next PS3 game would blow that one out the water. And PS3 had the last laugh in sales and graphics lol.

You mean that everytime a 3rd party release a great game that is better on Ps4 sony 1st party will release an even better one? Make sense.