hes obviously not a gamer. Why a ps3 when he request for teh best gaming pc with Quad titans and 64gn of the fatest ram with the best CPU and terabytes worth of Solid state drive. lol

I understand what your opinion is, what you label as 'truth' is your opinion, nothing else. What's more, it's not backed by facts as the Norwegian prison system has proved to be one of the most effective in the world. That's fine though, you're free to think that a more draconian approach would be better, the people of Norway don't want your system, and it was a steadfast commitment of the people to not sacrifice the ideals of the nation for the lust for revange after what Breivik did. This resolve was and is a source of pride for Norwegians, it's been lauded world wide, and has been instrumental in the feelings of the Norwegian people that they will not be broken or defeated by a little shit like Anders Breivik. These are the contexts around his sentecing and how he serves his sentence that you don't understand. It's also why your holier-than-thou attitude is offensive to people who has had to live through this trauma first hand and are proud of the way it's been handled. And to be honest, your demonstrated lack of understanding of his sentencing and what it means, plus the parroting some nonsense about the easy conditions he is serving under makes it even more offensive. Basically, it's fine to have an opinion about what should be done, but without showing any sensitivity to why things are they way they are, and on top of that not relating to the facts but rather something you think is the case you bring nothing to the discussion and come off as uninformed and offensive at the same time.

I brought up the PS3 issue because you specifically used that as an expample of how we hear about his gaming issues over and over. If you understood anything about this situation, you would also understand why the demand for a PS3 was even reported on by the press and how it ties into how Norwegians process the trauma he is responsible for. As you might or might not know, his demand for a PS3 upgrade was just one of many damands and complaints he was allowed to make and the demands have been considered and dealt with. The way this was handled is all part of how Norway deals with a situation that was and still is unthinkable for the country. Kneejerk comments along the lines of "OMG! Why is he even allowed to have a PS2!!!" doesn't even begin to skratch the surface off this topic. As I have stated many times, you have shown no indication of understanding any of this, and so your comments are meaningless. And yes, I freely admit that this topic is hugly emotional to me personally, and that is why I find your illinformed ramblings on this topic offensive.

And in closing, your assumption about the only confirmation we have is that he will be in jail for 21 years and then be released is incorrect. You've been told many times already how this will be handled, but you don't understand the type of sentencing, why it is used and the conditions it implies and still continue pretending that 21 years in jail is a possible outcome. Of course, in the real world you can never guarantee anything, and perhaps Anders Breivik is released from jail because the sun swallows up the earth in the next 10 years or he mutates into some kind of x-man that can bend the minds of everyone around him. In all practical senses though, the sentencing he is serving under, seen in relation to what he did, is a life time prison and any reporting that he might be out in 21 or even 10 years in sensationalistic click baiting. The same is the case of the reports of his easy life. Probably driven by fluff pieces on Fox news about how he has a private work out room and an office, that his cell is larger than most NYC appartments or whatever. In reality, Anders Breivik serves under conditions as close to being thrown in a hole for the rest of his life as possible without violating Norwegian and international law.

As for your last paragraph: logical fallacy.

he deservs a 3DO---

Not sure how much further I want to continue this conversation, it's obvious that you are working off of partial information and you don't have access to the information reported in Norwegian media and you don't bother listening to the people who do when they try to explain where you are misunderstanding the case.

Anyway, again. I can assure you that there is no need to consider a theoretical release for good behavior after 21 years for Breivik. I can understand why you would think so based on how international media report on the case, but they are wrong and you are wrong. There is no hope for getting out early for good behavior for this guy. His sentencing has no provision for good behavior at all. He will remain in jail for as long as he is considered a 'danger to society' which in Norwegian can also include considerations on how the public at large would react to a release. This type of sentencing has two functions: to prevent releasing prisoners who are likely to commit serious crimes again in the future and to keep people in jail for as long as needed as to not offend the public sense of justice. You can consider it a fact that Breivik will not be released.

Second, Norway has no problems conveying their message. But, in this case as in any case, the press reports only what they think will sell well. In nNorway, and news related to Breivik is still reported on, which means that the ruling on Breiviks various demands was also reported. I am pretty sure international press didn't bother to report what happened with his demand. (Hint: he won't be getting a PS3 or any traction for any of his other outragous demands and complaints)

Finally, again I will repeat that the death sentence (or torture for life or whatever you'd prefer he recieve) were not legal alternatives in Norway when Breivik did what he did and they still are not. There was substantial debate in Norway after the tragedy around the death penalty, length of term and many other issues related to how you punish inconcievable crimes. The common consensus in Norway was that it is more important to protect the ideals of the Norwegian way of life than to fill the need for immidiate revenge against Breivik. Especially since Breivik's acts were a delibarate attack on these ideals and an attempt to force chance to the judicial process. That way Norway came together and showed that they are stronger than this nutcase and his imaginary European revolution and in the process Breivik was also denied the "martyr's death" that he so much wanted. Instead he is stuck in a tiny cell 23 hours of the day and regularily humiliated when his hyperinflated ego decideds to file a complaint or make a demand or whatever. It does my heart good every time I am reminded that Anders Breivik is sitting in a hole and feeling like he's being tortured and treated like an animal, all the time while Norway has not had to go outside the rule of law to make that asshole feel like he is being mistreated.

I get emotional about this issue, it is very personal to me, so with a few days to cool off I appologize for some of the overly harsh language I used against you. I do recommend that you collect more information on this case though before making statements of what should be done differently.

Fixed it for you. :)

What's a turd? It's like a fat frog isn't it?

LOL. No, it's a lump of shit.

Oh.