I read everything you wrote, and what I found was a lack of direction in the OP, except bashing Nintendo for being less and less creative. You have no point to this thread. This is how the OP goes:

Nintendo is less and less creative, doing less and less NEW things with new or old IP's (and this thesis is supported with little evidence, that you have put together without much research), but lets NOT bring the other console makers into this because third parties. BUT, Sony did make a lot of new IP's for the PS3, and so did Xbox as well... kinda. And then you have lots of new next gen IP's that's not coming to Wii U!

Do you notice your inconsistency? What is the POINT? I think it has something to do with new experiences in games, and that you're criticising for not delivering that, and at the same time you try to shelter MS/Sony by saying that they don't NEED to offer new experiences since they have 3rd party support. But then you go ahead anyways and say that MS/Sony offered a lot of new IP's this gen.

I guess you're trying to say that innovation sell hardware? But then again, you implied that Wii had less new fresh ideas than previous Nintendo consoles, so that would counter your own point since it sold the most last gen, and especially if we consider your statement that PS3 got a lot of new experiences but still hardly beat box...

Nintendo needs newer ips and games for older gamers and more third party games.
Mario and donkey kong can't carry Nintendo for ever

It isn't, and as such its sales have fallen off a cliff.

You say I have no point, and yet you state correctly that my point is that Nintendo is failing to continue the creative formula that has been essential to them staying in the black more and more as time goes on. But there are some massive points you are not getting or don't understand:

1) Third parties are a valid point as many other people pointed out.  Not having The Division, The Witcher, and countless more next gen experiences is exactly why the Wii U looks like a last-gen machine.  

2) Sony DID make a ton of new IP's that did things the previous gen never did.  Remember that persistant online war with 256 player battles you had on PS2?  Me neither...

3) I am not "Bashing" Nintendo.  I am merily pointing out that rehashes of old IP's only get you the hardcore supporters (Hence the big launch numbers).  But to convinve the larger gaming audience that this new console will offer new experiences you need to actually have fresh and groud breaking games.  Nintendo used to excel at that, and that is what kept them allive when third parties abbandoned their inferior console designs.  Now they are starting to lose the one thing that kept them afloat and it really shows...  

Like I said you simply don't see the good in the small random list of the games I mentioned.  There are many more, and most of them haven't even been anounced.  Again, go ahead and skip this generation if you want.  We won't miss you...

The lack of Metroid Prime in the OP compels me to post once, then never come back.

Please guys, stop with these brainless threads

when did Nintendo ever sell home consoles on 1st Party alone?? NES and SNES both had a plethora of 3rd party support. once that left we got the N64 and GCN, yeah werent sales on them great. Wii pulled off the unthinkable and made video games popular with everyone, Wii U is back to typical Nintendo without support and sales will reflect that.

That's true, the difference being though that there isn't a seperate EA console that you have to buy just to play Madden and NHL. Or a Rockstar console that plays GTA. 

Those franchises share the same platform and as such those said platforms have wider appeal. 

If Sony was cut off from third party support and could only offer God Of War, Gran Turismo, Uncharted, etc. ... they probably wouldn't sell more than 12-15 million consoles either. 

more doom, yeah.