By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - UPDATED - 7th Gen - 'Which System Won The Console War' - Poll Added

 

Who really won the the 7th Gen Console War?

Nintendo 138 46.46%
 
Xbox 360 30 10.10%
 
PS3 92 30.98%
 
Make Love Not War 17 5.72%
 
See Poll 17 5.72%
 
Total:294
Lawlight said:

Wrong. As of the 30th of September, the 360 sold 79.4M units, not 80M.

I stand corrected.

Wii - 100.3 Million as of September

360 - 80 Million as of October

PS3 - 80 Million as of November

PS3 is still behind. It only just reached the 360 sales total of 1 Month ago. Right now, the PS3 is still in dead last 3rd place. It hasnt won the console war.



                            

Around the Network

The generation is going to end when the PS4 and Xbox One launches. There is no need to extend the generation beyond it's limits. The PS360 had a good run and sold a lot, but the PS3 is far from the winner!



"I've Underestimated the Horse Power from Mario Kart 8, I'll Never Doubt the WiiU's Engine Again"

S.T.A.G.E. said:
Viper1 said:
Sales winner - Wii
Profit winner - Wii
Turnaround winner - PS3
Generation to generation winner - Nintendo
PR winner - X360


Overall winner - Gamers


Sony won last generation. Generation to generation is like saying consecutive.

Not necessarily.  It could also mean, as I implied, that a console maker increased their market share or sales the most.  That's just a difficult thing to say in a short statement and I didn't want that one factor stretched out much further than it already is...so 'generation to generation' it became.



The rEVOLution is not being televised

jonathanalis said:
if we consider the end of this generation now, wii won.
if u consider the 7th gen being 2005 to 2017, ps3 will probably win.
even, ps3 spend 11 year (almost 2 generations) to reach the sales of 6~7 year of wii...


The idea that just because a console is still on the market in some parts of the world, that the generation it is from is somehow "still going", is both wishful fanboy thinking on anyone's part, and also completely absurd.

 

Just because the Atari 2600 was still available when the Master System and NES were out, doesn't mean that the second gen of consoles was still going. The 2600 wasn't officially discountinued until 1992. That doesn't mean it wasn't already long dead by then. The NES lasted a good 10 years, just in NA alone, not being discontinued until 1995. In Japan, the Famicom was still available at retail until 2003 for christ's sake. But that does not mean that even when the NES was still going strong in 1993 and 1994, that it's generation wasn't already long over, and that we were knee deep in the 16-bit fourth generation of consoles.

 

It has been pretty firmly established long before now, that a new generation starts, and the old one closes, when new consoles start coming out. You could argue that when one system has a big head-start, like the Xbox 360 or the Wii U, that the previous gen is still winding down. But with the Wii U out, and the PS4 and Xbox One almost on the market, yes, the seventh gen is now over, dead, finito. Does that those consoles won't still sell for some time, get a few more games, etc.? Of course not. But it's still over, and the Wii won the genration by a healthy margin. End of story.



It didn´t !

It may have won gamers´ goodwill, but it didn´t win by any normal standard

You can look at the term "winning a generation" from two different perspectives: Market share and profits.

The PS3 was a financial flop for Sony and the PS3 lost the dominative marketshare the predecessors enjoyed.

It is a great console, but no sane person would call that "winning"!



Around the Network

I'll say that the PS3 made what many would have considered to be an impossible recovery/turnaround back in 2007-2008 when there were some pretty hilarious/hopeful predictions that Sony would be forced to leave the console business due to the failure of the PS3. Meanwhile, it was simultaneously predicted that the Wii would become a standard household item with the more optimistic predictions wish/believing Nintendo would eventually sell something in the range of 250 million units.

In terms of marketshare lost, it's a no-brainer when you're starting from something like 80% from the previous generation. Of course, this was for a $299 box that had no legitimate competition at the time. The GC and XB arrived too late to stop the momentum. So even if the PS3 miraculously closed up production with just over 50% of the total 7th gen hardware sales (obviously impossible), it still would have lost a huge percentage of marketshare compared to the PS2.

In terms of monetary losses, not only did Sony manage to debut with a box that cost $600, they topped themselves by losing well over $200 per unit over production cost for the initial models. While those models were in production for less than a year, it still took several years and hardware revisions before Sony was able to make a small profit on each hardware unit sold. This wouldn't have been such an issue had Sony been taking in say 70-80% or even just over 50% of the revenue (for the total console market) being generated through software sales and licensing fees, but this wasn't the case. It was closer to a third at best.

The number of units sold may well be the least important number relative to the above and ironically, this is the number the PS3 has the greatest chance of actually "winning" if it stays in production long enough, given that the current numerical "winner" of the 7th gen is for all intents and purposes done, dead and finished selling any significant number of hardware units.

In terms of positioning, heading into the current generation of consoles, Nintendo managed to kill their lead faster and harder than Sony managed to kill their lead continuing from the PS2. Nintendo literally has 100% of the 8th gen console sales and will likely find itself in last place somewhere between Q4 2013 and Q2 2014. MS managed to leverage itself into the best position with the XB360, only to lose positioning with the reveal of the XB1 between the lesser hardware specs, the higher price and a bunch of the policies MS has since backtracked on due to consumer backlash, leaving Sony in good position with the PS4.

We'll see what happens from here. We've already seen that "winning" a hardware generation means little if this isn't leveraged properly into the next generation with the PS2 to PS3 transition and most likely with the Wii to the Wii-U.



DevilRising said:
jonathanalis said:
if we consider the end of this generation now, wii won.
if u consider the 7th gen being 2005 to 2017, ps3 will probably win.
even, ps3 spend 11 year (almost 2 generations) to reach the sales of 6~7 year of wii...


The idea that just because a console is still on the market in some parts of the world, that the generation it is from is somehow "still going", is both wishful fanboy thinking on anyone's part, and also completely absurd.

 

Just because the Atari 2600 was still available when the Master System and NES were out, doesn't mean that the second gen of consoles was still going. The 2600 wasn't officially discountinued until 1992. That doesn't mean it wasn't already long dead by then. The NES lasted a good 10 years, just in NA alone, not being discontinued until 1995. In Japan, the Famicom was still available at retail until 2003 for christ's sake. But that does not mean that even when the NES was still going strong in 1993 and 1994, that it's generation wasn't already long over, and that we were knee deep in the 16-bit fourth generation of consoles.

 

It has been pretty firmly established long before now, that a new generation starts, and the old one closes, when new consoles start coming out. You could argue that when one system has a big head-start, like the Xbox 360 or the Wii U, that the previous gen is still winding down. But with the Wii U out, and the PS4 and Xbox One almost on the market, yes, the seventh gen is now over, dead, finito. Does that those consoles won't still sell for some time, get a few more games, etc.? Of course not. But it's still over, and the Wii won the genration by a healthy margin. End of story.

Agreed, makes much more sense consider the gens this way.

But try to explain it to a sony fan...



Cute



Ongoing bet with think-man: He wins if MH4 releases in any shape or form on PSV in 2013, I win if it doesn't.

BrainCramps said:
Mnementh said:
Slade6alpha said:
This isn't going to end well... I expect a minimum of two bans to come from this thread.
If you think PS3 won, cool, if not, cool as well. In reality, does it really affect you? I guess for some it does.

I don't think so. At this point this flamebait is only worth a *yawn*.


Posting an article filled wityh facts is flamebait?? It's flamebait because it hurts your feelings? There is nothing wrong with the thread.

I don't claim the thread is flamebait. The article cited is. Because posting an article with a headline that is obviously totally wrong is flamebait. Or in terms of articles posted on sites with advertisement 'clickbait'. The article puts out some true numbers, but none of them justify taht the PS3 won the gen. And it didn't hurt my feelings, otherwise it wouldn't be yawn-worthy.

Why did you attack me, as I stated the obvious? Did that hurt your feelings?



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024, 2025 

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [GTA6]

IsawYoshi said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
IsawYoshi said:
Just because you sell the most doesn't mean they won. They went down from 150 to possibly 100 million. Nintendo went from 22 to 100. And 80 to 150. I can't see how Sony can be the winner of the gen. Although they are specificly talking about the PS3 here. Still, the PS3 let all their opponent's catch up, and we still do not know if it will be the best seller, for those that only looks at that, and not the whole picture.


Nintendo won, but they pandered to a market that cannot be salvaged because they aren't truly interested in the product enough to reinvest. Nintendo would have to capture their attention all over again with a new gimmick or an upgrade to that gimmick. 

Yes, now they have to start over again, but even so they made a gigantic comback last time, and this is about last gen, not current gen (for Wii U owners).


I dont gauge gens by when Nintendo does things. They do their own thing. I thought people would've caught on by now that for the rest of us next gen starts in a week or so.