By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony - Last Of Us. Whats the fuss? Spoilers

riderz13371 said:
PullusPardus said:
riderz13371 said:

Lol "overrated"...God damn man you use this word too much. You just remind me of that grumpy cat meme everytime I see one of your posts. Such a hispter bro...

I love how you guys throw insults at me because I am having an opinion , and when I call someone something i get banned. =/

I didn't insult you. It's just you do use that word way too often.

I know right? The word overrated is overrated.



Around the Network
sub-zero-TM said:
Lol these xbox guys...

you may get banned because of that. >_<



Hynad said:
HoloDust said:

What point exactly, except different strokes for different folks, what OP pretty much is all about? I personally find Bioshock 1 leaps and bounds more immersive and engaging than TLoU.

My point is that The Last of Us did push story telling forward in the same way games like Bioshock and Halflife did before it. I wouldn't have enjoyed Bioshock and Bioshock Infinite nearly as much if their story telling wasn't good. Cause most FPS games don't do much to me. But in the case od that game series, it does it well enough and different enough to be appealing to me.

When it comes to The Last of Us, the story telling is present in most of its aspects. If these games represent the future of game story telling, it's gonna be an incredible time to be a gamer.

Well, fair enough - not saying it's a bad game, on the contrary, I just personally don't see it that important as Half Life/System Shock 2/Bioshock were, but that might just come to personal preference. (which I'm sure it is, e.g., I find I cared much more for Horatio and Crispin in Primordia (just finished it last week) than I ever did for Joel and Ellie, so, I guess I haven't found TLoU story that much engaging to begin with)



riderz13371 said:
PullusPardus said:
riderz13371 said:
PullusPardus said:

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=164482&page=1#

I am going to continue playing it but so far its just another overrated game by naughty dog.

by the way Uncharted 3 is going to piss you off at the end, I warned you, the part after the plane crash till the ending are terrible, and the ending is one of the worst endings to a high rated game next to Mass Effect 3 and Assassins Creed series

Lol "overrated"...God damn man you use this word too much. You just remind me of that grumpy cat meme everytime I see one of your posts. Such a hispter bro...

I love how you guys throw insults at me because I am having an opinion , and when I call someone something i get banned. =/

I didn't insult you. It's just you do use that word way too often.


Hipster is insulting to me >.<



veritaz said:
MY argument is not invalid at all. Grand theft auto is higher so my argument still stands, plus games do not get scored higher at the end of a gen, idk how you even think that is true. TLOU reviews are completely justified and plz saying mario galaxy did some amazing innovate stuff is laughable, I beat it and it was the same old mario gameplay and story. Oh and defending Quarter to 3 when they completely score opposite to every other reviewer is pathetic, I guess halo 4 is a 2/10 while star wars pinball is a 10/10. Your argument is very weak.

So reviewers have to regurgitate the same score as every other reviewer to be deemed legitimate?

All reviews are just glorified opinions.



Around the Network
JakDaSnack said:
think-man said:
pezus said:
JakDaSnack said:

1. The combat itself is near identicle to uncharted

2. the point is that while the gameplay is pretty good, they took some stuff from ZombiU that I really enjoyed, nothing is original, 

1. Did we play the same games? The gameplay is not even close to being the same.

2. The fuck? Like what?

You also say games need to be FUN, yet you put heavy emphasis on innovation. Can't games be fun without innovating? And what exactly did Galaxy innovate?

I think its safe to say JakDaSnack never played either Uncharted or TLOU with that comment.

I think you have confused the word "combat" with "gameplay"

Nope, both are vastly different.



think-man said:
JakDaSnack said:
think-man said:
pezus said:
JakDaSnack said:

1. The combat itself is near identicle to uncharted

2. the point is that while the gameplay is pretty good, they took some stuff from ZombiU that I really enjoyed, nothing is original, 

1. Did we play the same games? The gameplay is not even close to being the same.

2. The fuck? Like what?

You also say games need to be FUN, yet you put heavy emphasis on innovation. Can't games be fun without innovating? And what exactly did Galaxy innovate?

I think its safe to say JakDaSnack never played either Uncharted or TLOU with that comment.

I think you have confused the word "combat" with "gameplay"

Nope, both are vastly different.

both are 3rd person shooters, both have similar melee combat, though TLOU has a few elements added into it, remember i said "near" identical.  That's all "combat" is so I guess I was right.  If you were thinking I meant that TLOU was a run and gun shooter or something, that's your problem, not mine.



Something...Something...Games...Something

You really do have to play the full game to appreciate it, I think it was intentionally made slow to begin with because i remember there was a point when i took notice of the graphics among other things before i suddenly got into the game.
If you have read anything on this game before playing it then i think you have ruined alot of the experience for yourself, even the simplicity of the seasons adds a lot to the game story and game play wise especially when at the start your wondering exactly where this game might go



pezus said:
curl-6 said:
veritaz said:
MY argument is not invalid at all. Grand theft auto is higher so my argument still stands, plus games do not get scored higher at the end of a gen, idk how you even think that is true. TLOU reviews are completely justified and plz saying mario galaxy did some amazing innovate stuff is laughable, I beat it and it was the same old mario gameplay and story. Oh and defending Quarter to 3 when they completely score opposite to every other reviewer is pathetic, I guess halo 4 is a 2/10 while star wars pinball is a 10/10. Your argument is very weak.

So reviewers have to regurgitate the same score as every other reviewer to be deemed legitimate?

All reviews are just glorified opinions.

Company of Heroes 2 PC 1 star 6/24/13
SimCity PC 1 star 3/8/13
Guardians of Middle-Earth Xbox 360 1 star 1/2/13
Playstation All-Star Battle Royale Playstation 3 1 star 12/21/12
Halo 4 Xbox 360 1 star 11/5/12
Resident Evil 6 Xbox 360 1 star 10/2/12
Lollipop Chainsaw Xbox 360 1 star 6/12/12
Ratchet & Clank: All 4 One Playstation 3 1 star 12/12/11
From Dust Xbox 360 1 star 7/28/11
Civilization V: Brave New World PC 2 stars 7/11/13
Starcraft II: Heart of the Swarm PC 2 stars 3/14/13
Sleeping Dogs Xbox 360 2 stars 8/14/12
The Secret World PC 2 stars 7/9/12
Dirt Showdown Xbox 360 2 stars 6/26/12
Civilization V: Gods & Kings PC 2 stars 6/18/12
Max Payne 3 Xbox 360 2 stars 5/28/12
Journey Playstation 3 2 stars 3/19/12
Final Fantasy XIII-2 Xbox 360 2 stars 2/6/12
Soulcalibur V Xbox 360 2 stars 1/31/12
Orcs Must Die Xbox 360 2 stars 10/17/11
Forza 4 Xbox 360 2 stars 10/13/11
Catherine Playstation 3 2 stars 7/26/11
Shadows of the Damned Xbox 360 2 stars 6/28/11
Marvel vs. Capcom 3 Xbox 360 2 stars 5/5/11

Some of the scores are just plain insulting

Insulting because they're unpopular?



@sales

Lol at the comic. So true. One of my biggest disappointments with the game. It truly sapped out the immersion every time something like that happened. Bill or Ellie actually bumped into a clicker once or twice during stealth moments and nothing happened. It blew me away how god-awful the enemy and friendly AI was sometimes. Human enemies seemed much, much better, though.

Absolutely horrible enemy AI was one of my biggest complaints in U3 as well. I love ND, but they really need to get there stuff together in the AI department.