By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo - EA continues to defecate on Nintendo

KeptoKnight said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
KeptoKnight said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
KeptoKnight said:
S.T.A.G.E. said:
KeptoKnight said:

I want Mass Effect 4 on Wii-U to use with gamepad =(


There is no way Mass Effect would ever exist on the Wii U without severe dumbing down after the new consoles launch. The Wii U wouldnt be able to handle the scale that is expected from the new consoles.


I already have a beast of PC machine....i still wouldnt mind a dumb down version of it for Wii-U.......

 

**next time watch out for your bold statements again as if the consoles already been released and know what will happen.

Then your third party needs are more than met. You don't count. I am talking about Nintendo only owners.

I do count. I said I want to use it with gamepad......obviously I prefer it on a Nintendo platform.

Thats psychological....not my problem.

here we go with ur bold statements again. its not a problem. Gamepad is awesome. Eg. COD advantage.

Ive played COD on the Wii U, the pro is better imho. As for you wanting to play a Mass Effect game on a Nintendo console, thats no longer Nintendos problem if the next consoles break past the specs demanded of them which its coming clearer now that they most definitely will. Nintendo will be mostly existing off of exclusives much like the original Wii.



Around the Network

Its EA, you are not missing much.

And dude...I was hoping the title was real and had videos :(



@sethnintendo

That is a pretty weak counter argument. Hostages do not make for good witnesses, and neither do salesman. These people aren't in any kind of position to offer up a contrary point of view. Given that their games sales can suffer as a result. The platform holder can withdraw their game from their store. The platforms fans can withhold purchasing the game, and they are making a pitch through a fundamentally bias media outlet. If they hadn't said only things that made the platform look good.

They would have suffered severe consequences for doing so. The site might have written a scathing review of all of their products, of them as a developer, and encouraged its audience to not buy their products. Not to mention that Nintendo might well concoct a excuse to pull their game from their lineup. That isn't to say that you cannot get more genuine commentary, but that comes from people that either don't have anything to lose, or are just plain big enough that they cannot be intimidated.

Which are two categories that most independent developers do not fall into. They are basically weak and helpless in this situation. You know what else I don't trust. Those actors that give color commentary during sneak peaks of movies that they are actually play a role in. I don't believe them when they say the director is a genius, or that the story is the best ever told, or that their fellow actors are genuinely great human beings.

How many horrible movies have we all seen in our lives. That these people told us were pure gold. It is obvious why they would say so, because it helps their careers, and helps them make more money, but once they have all of that. Well that is when you start to get actual honesty out of them. That is when you find out that so and so was just plain coked out of his mind, or that they were fucking miserable the whole time they made that movie.

Once again no proof whatsoever, and for the love of all that is holy. Don't use Nintendo Life as a source. I mean I wouldn't trust any media outlet that has a manufacturers name as part of theirs. After all their own success is just plain entirely tied to the success of the platform. So they have every incentive in the world to over sell everything about the product, and downplay every negative.



Ssenkahdavic said:
Its EA, you are not missing much.

And dude...I was hoping the title was real and had videos :(


Yes, EA is irrelevant, the publisher/dev that puts out 20% of the top third party games coming out each year. I would love for you guys to boycott Ubisoft as well when down the road Nintendo owners bitch about not getting multiplats when they know its a specs issue.



Well, it's a good thing it's the company I despise the very most who does these things, as that means I can shrug it off a little easier. They don't make games I care about anymore. It's trouble for Nintendo though, even if for me, it makes the system MORE attractive that EA opts out.



Around the Network

everyone is defecating on nintendo right now but dont worry, the defecating will migrate to the next new game system that releases. happens all the time.



sethnintendo said:

http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2013/02/tiger_woods_is_skipping_the_wii_u_this_year

http://mynintendonews.com/2013/02/01/ea-snubs-wii-u-again-madden-25-isnt-coming-to-wii-u/ (no word on Wii U version, just PS3/360 have been announced for Madden 25)

http://www.nintendolife.com/news/2013/02/ea_excited_about_new_generation_which_is_yet_to_come

RIP Origin Systems, Westwood Studios, Bullfrog Productions, Maxis, and many more.


Or current EA games are not selling on the WiiU and it offers no new market, just lost money and time for devs to produce games for it.

So lets all put away the tin hats and realise that from a financial view, the WiiU is dire to any investor.



Dodece said:

@Mnementh

Sony actually had a substantial technological advantage over Nintendo that made greater third party support almost a foregone conclusion, and that was their format for their platform cost all of a dollar to manufacture, and Sony even offered buy back on unsold copies. Whereas Nintendo used a format that cost between ten to fifteen dollars that Nintendo could never afford to run a buy back scheme for. Basically Sony did through technological innovation the same thing I am saying Nintendo ought to have done with software diversification. They made their platform a more profitable place to do business. With low risks, high rewards, and low overhead costs.

As for Electronic Arts they had something of a point. Sega had a really bad habit of abandoning platforms just as they had gotten developers to sink serious cash into games for them, and then Sega had the audacity to go after their market share after they had so royally fucked them over. In the end through either guile or incompetence Sega had made itself into a intolerable threat to Electronic Arts. It would be one thing if it had seemed like a fair competition, but from Electronic Arts position it had to have seemed underhanded and malicious.

You have to remember that back then Electronic Arts may have been big for the time, but it did not have the kind of cash reserves that it has today. Those abandoned platforms did a lot of damage to them, and Sega basically saying, and oh we are going after you too. It had to look like a textbook setup to them. So they stood their ground. Sega didn't flinch, and Sega learned that friendships don't last forever.

In the end it might not have mattered anyway, because if developers were burned by all that platform jumping so too were gamers. I knew a few Sega gamers that didn't buy a Dreamcast, because they were sure that Sega would launch a new console a couple years later.

Yes, you're are right, the N64-cartridge was a problem for 3rd-parties and Sony had an advantage there. But I understood your previous comment like Nintendo should have released games for all genres to show 3rd-parties how it is done. That's something Sony never did.

Well, and abandoning platforms is especially not bad for EA with the release of yearly franchises. I don't know how bold Sega was going after the marketshares, but it could also be a necessity, after missing 3rd-party efforts to fill the voids for the people that owned the systems. And I agree, that EAs decision to avoid Sega were a problem, but not the deciding thing for the Dreamcast to go south.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

Weedlab said:
I'm European so couldn't care less about Madden. I'd have more fun mixing cement or placing grout to my floor tiles.

FIFA is also by EA and while I'm (also european) not interested in the game, I know it is big here in europe. And EA made the last FIFA a bad port of an older version. If they avoid the WiiU with Tiger Woods and Madden (is that clear or only a rumor so far), they might do the same with FIFA.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]

Mazty said:

CEO's don't "hate" anyone. They like everyone who'll make them money. The Wii U just doesn't have a large enough user base or potential to warrant publishing games for it. Nothing more, nothing less.

Oh, CEOs are humans like everyone else. They might have hates. But if their decisions are bad for the company, they might be not CEO forever.



3DS-FC: 4511-1768-7903 (Mii-Name: Mnementh), Nintendo-Network-ID: Mnementh, Switch: SW-7706-3819-9381 (Mnementh)

my greatest games: 2017, 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024

10 years greatest game event!

bets: [peak year] [+], [1], [2], [3], [4]