the nintendo 3ds is far superior in terms of graphics, than the wii. capcom said in many interviews that the wii couldnt do the shaders and lighting sources that the 3ds can produce, i know square-enix has said this as well.
if u take the best graphical wii games and put them side by side to resident evil revelations,tekken 3d prime edition,doa,super street fighter 4 and kingdom hearts 3d,super mario 3d and a few others coming out soon. u begin to see just how powerful the 3ds actual is.

How can you do it more when you havn't done it once. You nitpicked at small, unimportant things without providing anything better then vanished. You didn't address 80% of what I said at all.

Please, feel free to continue to tear down your invisible post you mentally created for me to have written. My original ones will still be sitting there in all there detail.

Not to gang up on you, but how hasn't he proved you wrong once? 

First, he proved his argument concerning the 3DS' HDR rendering, which you even conceded to.

Second, he said that the pics you posted were not native res, which they aren't.

And while I could be wrong, I've never seen anything indicating that SMG 1 or 2 uses parallax mapping anywhere in the game, which was another statement you have yet to prove.  How about a link?

Much of what he didn't address in your posts (such as the polygonal model comparisons) is because he actually agreed with that from the start; he had already stated that the Wii is more powerful than the 3DS...

Thank you, Archbrix.  Sums up what I was going to say myself.

Lilbroex, your Revelations to RE4 comparison is rather humorous given you've posted a screen capture of a CGI cut scene from Revelations and not real time rendering.  Doesn't help that it's an 800 x 480 pic...a resolution not native to the 3DS.   Most likely a promo shot from Capcom.  I'd almost be willing to bet that if I log into the Capcom Press Center I'll find the same screen shot in their early press kits.

The 3DS is superior when it comes to shaders, but inferior in other areas, like screen resolution. 

I'm unfamiliar with the specs regarding 3DS's polygon pushing capabilities, but nearly all the games I've seen on it so far seem below the Wii in this area.Textures also seem inferior, though this is probably because they don't need to be as high res on a smaller screen; you'd think with more RAM the 3DS could outdo the Wii in textures if it needed to.

As for Mario 3D Land, it doesn't look nearly as good as Mario Galaxy 1 or 2; there's much less going on in terms of effects.

Also, Mario Galaxy uses EMBM, (Environment Mapped Bump Mapping) not Parallax or Normal Mapping.

The RAM difference is minimal. 

3DS - 128 MB with 32 MB dedicated to OS.   96 dedicated to gaming.

Wii - 91 MB dedicated to gaming.

Isn't some of the Wii's RAM dedicated to the OS as well? I mean, you can hit home and bring up the Wiimote menu at almost any time during gameplay.

That argument wasn't originally with him and it being able to produce HDR is a done deal. I never requestioned it. 

Whether they were native res or not was never part of what I was asking. It was and still is irrelevent. Then on top of that I posted multiple pictures before and one after that. They were completely ignored just to ridicule those two "company released?" pictures that I linked to. If you don't like the res of the pics then go take it up with Capcom or whoever released them. I posted the best I could find which is more than you who posted nothing but criticism.

Why would I provide more links when you've completely ignored that majority of the ones I've arleady posted? That would be illogical.

Why does it matter that he agreed or not? I was never arguing with him at first. He started an argument with me.

I thought the Wii's OS features were handled by the arm7(9?) core?

It has dual ARM11's as processors, so no on the 9 or 7, you are thinking the DS.  The processor alone can't run the OS so yes a little RAM needs to be involved to make it work.