By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
lilbroex on 14 March 2012
Edit Thread
archbrix said:
lilbroex said:
Viper1 said:

Are the boulders you reference in Mario Galaxy?  Then when I say Mario Galaxy does not utilize parallax mapping, that includes the boulders. 

The resolution factor is valid and no, your Wii image is not Wii reoslution at all.   It's lower.    Check your image properties.


I'll be back on later to tear down your posts even further.


How can you do it more when you havn't done it once. You nitpicked at small, unimportant things without providing anything better then vanished. You didn't address 80% of what I said at all.


Please, feel free to continue to tear down your invisible post you mentally created for me to have written. My original ones will still be sitting there in all there detail.

Not to gang up on you, but how hasn't he proved you wrong once? 

First, he proved his argument concerning the 3DS' HDR rendering, which you even conceded to.

Second, he said that the pics you posted were not native res, which they aren't.

And while I could be wrong, I've never seen anything indicating that SMG 1 or 2 uses parallax mapping anywhere in the game, which was another statement you have yet to prove.  How about a link?

Much of what he didn't address in your posts (such as the polygonal model comparisons) is because he actually agreed with that from the start; he had already stated that the Wii is more powerful than the 3DS...

That argument wasn't originally with him and it being able to produce HDR is a done deal. I never requestioned it. 

Whether they were native res or not was never part of what I was asking. It was and still is irrelevent. Then on top of that I posted multiple pictures before and one after that. They were completely ignored just to ridicule those two "company released?" pictures that I linked to. If you don't like the res of the pics then go take it up with Capcom or whoever released them. I posted the best I could find which is more than you who posted nothing but criticism.

Why would I provide more links when you've completely ignored that majority of the ones I've arleady posted? That would be illogical.

Why does it matter that he agreed or not? I was never arguing with him at first. He started an argument with me.